Abstract
The process of sexual selection results from mating advantages gained when members of one sex, usually males, compete for access to the other sex, and when competitors in better condition or bearing more extravagant ornaments are selected by individuals of the opposite sex, usually females. These ideas, published in detail by Darwin in 1871, led to the foundation of modern theory describing animal breeding systems, and are still instigating numerous researchers in ongoing studies that seek to understand reproductive phenomena in animals. Sexual selection promotes adaptations in behavior, morphology, and physiology, and also is an agent of speciation. In the first part of this chapter, we present an overview of sexual selection theory and some of the major advances in the last few decades. We then present work that we have developed within the scope of sexual selection theory, using as a model a small Neotropical passerine, the blue-black grassquit (Volatinia jacarina). We describe general parameters of this species and why it is an ideal model to study sexual selection. We follow this with a summary of field and laboratory methods we have used, and then address conceptual topics subdivided into four major categories: (1) parasite-mediated sexual selection; (2) social and sexual mating systems; (3) female choice; and (4) the evolution of sexual ornamentation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abbey-Lee RN, Kaise A, Mouchet A, Dingemanse NJ (2016) Immediate and carry-over effects of perceived predation risk on communication behavior in wild birds. Behav Ecol 27:708–716
Aguilar TM, Maia R, Santos ESA, Macedo RH (2008) Parasite levels in blue-black grassquits correlate with male displays but not female mate preference. Behav Ecol 19:292–301
Alatalo RV, Gustafsson L, Lundberg A (1984) High frequency of cuckoldry in pied and collared flycatchers. Oikos 42:41–47
Alderton C (1963) The breeding behavior of the blue-black grassquit. Condor 65:154–162
Almeida SP (1995) Grupos fenológicos da comunidade de gramíneas perenes de um campo cerrado no Distrito Federal, Brasil. Pesq Agropec Bras 30:1067–1073
Almeida JB, Macedo RH (2001) Lek-like mating system of the monogamous blue-black grassquit. Auk 118:404–411
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Aparicio JM, Ortego J, Cordero PJ (2006) What should we weigh to estimate heterozygosity, alleles or loci? Mol Ecol 15:4659–4665
Badyaev AV, Hill GE (2003) Avian sexual dichromatism in relation to phylogeny and ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:27–49
Beani L, Zuk M (2014) Beyond sexual selection: the evolution of sex differences from brain to behaviour. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 46:497–500
Bensch S, Hasselquist D (1992) Evidence for active female choice in a polygynous warbler. Anim Behav 44:301–311
Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic, London
Birkhead TR, Pellatt J, Hunter FM (1988) Extra-pair copulation and sperm competition in zebra finch. Nature 334:60–62
Borgia G, Collis K (1989) Female choice for parasite-free male satin bowerbirds and the evolution of bright male plumage. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:445–453
Bosholn M, Fecchio A, Silveira P, Braga EM, Anciães M (2015) Effects of avian malaria on male behaviour and female visitation in lekking blue-crowned manakins. J Avian Biol 47:457–465
Botero CA, Rubenstein DR (2012) Fluctuating environments, sexual selection and the evolution of flexible mate choice in birds. PLoS One 7:e32311
Brawner WR, Hill GE (1999) Temporal variation in shedding of coccidial oocysts: implications for sexual-selection studies. Can J Zool 77:347–350
Bray OE, Kennelly II, Guarino JL (1975) Fertility of eggs produced on territories of vasectomized red-winged blackbirds. Wilson Bull 87:187–195
Buchanan KL, Catchpole CK (2000) Song as an indicator of male parental effort in the sedge warbler. Proc R Soc B 267:321–326
Buchholz R (1995) Effects of parasitic infection on mate sampling by female wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo): should infected females be more or less choosy? Behav Ecol 15:687–694
Burke T, Bruford MW (1987) DNA fingerprinting in birds. Nature 327:149–152
Byers BE, Kroodsma DE (2009) Female mate choice and songbird song repertoires. Anim Behav 77:13–22
Byers J, Hebets E, Podos J (2010) Female mate choice based upon male motor performance. Anim Behav 79:771–778
Carmona-Isunza MC, Küpper C, Serrano-Meneses MA, Székely T (2015) Courtship behaviour differs between monogamous and polygamous plovers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:2035–2042
Carvalho C (1957) Notas ecológicas sobre Volatinia jacarina (Passeres, Fringillidae). Bol Mus Para Emilio Goeldi 2:1–10
Carvalho CBV, Macedo RH, Graves JA (2006) Breeding strategies of a socially monogamous Neotropical passerine: extra-pair fertilizations, behavior, and morphology. Condor 108:579–590
Carvalho CBV, Macedo RH, Graves JA (2007) Reproduction of blue-black grassquits in central Brazil. Braz J Biol 67:275–281
Clark C (2012) The role of power versus energy in courtship: what is the ‘energetic cost’ of a courtship display? Anim Behav 84:269–277
Clayton DH (1990) Mate choice in experimentally parasitized rock doves: lousy males lose. Am Zool 30:251–262
Clayton DH, Pruett-Jones SG, Lande R (1992) Reappraisal of the interspecific prediction of parasite-mediated sexual selection: opportunity knocks. J Theor Biol 157:95–108
Cornwallis CK, Uller T (2010) Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. TREE 25:145–152
Costa FJV, Macedo RH (2005) Coccidian oocyst parasitism in the blue-black grassquit: influence on secondary sex ornaments and body condition. Anim Behav 70:1401–1409
Darwin CR (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray, London
Darwin CR (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London
Dias AFS (2009) Comparação e descrição de parâmetros acústicos do canto de Volatinia jacarina (Aves: Emberizidae) no contexto de seleção sexual. Dissertation, Universidade de Brasilia, Brazil
Dias RI, Macedo RH (2011) Nest predation versus resources in a Neotropical passerine: constraints of the food limitation hypothesis. Ornis Fenn 88:30–39
Dias RI, Kuhlmann M, Lourenço LR, Macedo RH (2009) Territorial clustering in the blue-black grassquit: reproductive strategy in response to habitat and food requirements? Condor 111:706–714
Dias RI, Castilho L, Macedo RH (2010) Experimental evidence that sexual displays are costly for nest survival. Ethology 116:1011–1019
Dias RI, Oliveira RF, Podos J, Macedo RH (2014) The importance of novelty: male-female interactions among blue-black grassquit in captivity. Behav Process 103:211–217
Diniz P, Ramos DM, Macedo RH (2015) Attractive males are less than adequate dads in a multimodal signaling passerine. Anim Behav 102:109–117
Doucet S (2002) Structural plumage coloration, male body size, and condition in the blue-black grassquit. Condor 104:30–38
Drickamer LC, Gowaty PA, Wagner DM (2003) Free mutual mate preferences in house mice affect reproductive success and offspring performance. Anim Behav 65:105–114
Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Pitcher TE (2001) Mating systems, sperm competition, and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution 55:161–175
DuVal EH, Kempenaers B (2008) Sexual selection in a lekking bird: the relative opportunity for selection by female choice and male competition. Proc R Soc B 275:1995–2003
Elias DO, Hebets EA, Hoy RR (2006) Female preference for complex/novel signals in a spider. Behav Ecol 17:765–771
Emlen ST, Oring L (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:214–223
Endler JA, Lyles AM (1989) Bright ideas about parasites. TREE 4:246–248
Fandiño-Mariño H, Vielliard JME (2004) Complex communication signals: the case of the blue-black grassquit Volatinia jacarina (Aves, Emberizidae) song. Part I - a structural analysis. An Acad Nac Ciênc 76:325–334
Fisher RA (1915) The evolution of sexual preference. Eugen Rev 3:184–192
Galimberti F, Boitani L, Marzetti I (2000) Female strategies of harassment reduction in southern elephant seals. Ethol Ecol Evol 12:367–388
Greve JH (1996) Gastrointestinal parasites. In: Kosskopf W, Woerpel R (eds) Diseases of cage and aviary birds. Williams &Wilkins, Hong Kong
Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212
Griffith SC, Lyon BE, Montgomerie R (2004) Quasi-parasitism in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:191–200
Gross WB, Siegel HS (1983) Evaluation of the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a measure of stress in chickens. Avian Dis 27:972–979
von Haartman L (1951) Successive polygamy. Behaviour 3:256–274
Hamilton WD (1990) Mate choice near and far. Am Zool 30:341–352
Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384–387
Hill GE, McGraw KJ (2006) Bird coloration, vol 2. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Hoelzer GA (1989) The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim Behav 38:1067–1078
Höglund J, Alatalo RV (1995) Leks. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hõrak P, Saks L, Ots I, Kollist H (2002) Repeatability of condition indices in captive green finches (Carduelis chloris). Can J Zool 80:636–643
Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev 72:283–327
Kanegae MF, Valim M, Fonseca MA, Marini MA, Freire NMS (2008) Ácaros plumícolas (Acari: Astigmata) em aves do Cerrado do Distrito Federal, Brasil. Biota Neotrop 8:31–39
Karubian J, Swaddle JP, Varian-Ramos CW, Webster MS (2009) The relative importance of male tail length and nuptial plumage on social dominance and mate choice in the red-backed fairy-wren Malurus melanocephalus: evidence for the multiple receiver hypothesis. J Avian Biol 40:559–568
Kempenaers B (2007) Mate choice and genetic quality: a review of the heterozygosity theory. Adv Study Behav 37:189–278
Kirkpatrick M (1986) Sexual selection and cycling parasites: a simulation model of Hamilton’s hypothesis. J Theor Biol 119:263–271
Kirkpatrick M (1987) Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:43–70
Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38
Kokko H, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2006) Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:43–66
Koop JAH, Clayton DH (2013) Evaluation of two methods for quantifying passeriform lice. J Field Ornithol 84:210–215
Kotiaho JS (2002) Sexual selection and condition dependence of courtship display in three species of horned dung beetles. Behav Ecol 13:791–799
Lacava RV, Brasileiro L, Maia R, Oliveira R, Macedo RH (2011) Social environment affects testosterone level in captive male blue-black grassquits. Horm Behav 59:51–55
Lindenfors P, Tullberg BS (1998) Phylogenetic analyses of primate size evolution: the consequences of sexual selection. Biol J Linn Soc 64:413–447
Lyon BE, Eadie JM (2008) Conspecific brood parasitism in birds: a life-history perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:343–363
Macedo RH (2008) Neotropical model systems: social and mating behavior of birds. Ornitol Neotrop 10:85–92
Macedo RH, Machado G (eds) (2013) Sexual selection: perspectives and models from the Neotropics. Academic, London
Macedo RH, Karubian J, Webster MS (2008) Extrapair paternity and sexual selection in socially monogamous birds: are tropical birds different? Auk 125:769–777
Macedo RH, Manica L, Dias RI (2012) Conspicuous sexual signals in a socially monogamous passerine: the case of Neotropical blue-black grassquits. J Ornithol 153:15–22
Macedo RH, Podos J, Graves J, Manica LT (2018) Breeding clusters in birds: ecological selective contexts, mating systems and the role of extrapair fertilizations. Anim Behav 143:145–154
Magalhães RB, Diniz P, Macedo RH (2014) Plumage coverage is related to body condition and ectoparasitism in blue-black grassquits. Wilson J Ornithol 126:581–584
Maia R, Macedo RH (2011) Achieving luster: prenuptial molt pattern predicts iridescent structural coloration in blue-black grassquits. J Ornithol 152:243–252
Maia R, Brasileiro L, Lacava RV, Macedo RH (2012) Social environment affects acquisition and color of structural nuptial plumage in a sexually dimorphic tropical passerine. PLoS One 7:e47501
Manica L, Dias A, Maia R, Podos J, Macedo RH (2014) Vocal output predicts territory quality in a Neotropical songbird. Behav Process 109:21–26
Manica LT, Graves JA, Podos J, Macedo RH (2016) Multimodal flight display of a Neotropical songbird predicts social pairing but not extrapair mating success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:2039–2052
Manica LT, Macedo RH, Graves J, Podos J (2017) Vigor and skill in the acrobatic mating displays of a Neotropical songbird. Behav Ecol 28:164–173
Maxwell MH (1993) Avian blood leucocyte responses to stress. Worlds Poult Sci J 49:34–43
McClennan DA, Brooks DR (1991) Parasites and sexual selection: a macroevolutionary perspective. Q Rev Biol 66:255–286
McDougald LR, Reid WM (1997) Protozoa. In: Calnek BW (ed) Diseases of poultry. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 865–883
Milinski M, Bakker TCM (1990) Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature 344:330–333
Miller CW, Svensson EI (2014) Sexual selection in complex environments. Annu Rev Entomol 59:427–445
Møller AP (1990) Parasites and sexual selection: current status of the Hamilton and Zuk hypothesis. J Evol Biol 3:319–328
Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1994) The evolution of plumage brightness in birds is related to extrapair paternity. Evolution 48:1089–1100
Møller AP, Christe P, Lux E (1999) Parasitism, host immune function, and sexual selection. Q Rev Biol 74:3–20
Moreno J, Velando A, Gonzalez-Braojos S, Ruiz-de-Castaneda R, Cantarero A (2013) Females paired with more attractive males show reduced oxidative damage: possible direct benefits of mate choice in pied flycatchers. Ethology 119:727–737
Murray BGJ (1982) Territorial behaviour of the blue-black grassquit. Condor 84:119–119
Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2005) Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol Ecol 14:19–38
O’Loghlen AL, Rothstein SI (2010) Multimodal signalling in a songbird: male audiovisual displays vary significantly by social context in brown-headed cowbirds. Anim Behav 79:1285–1292
Ots I, Mrumagi A, Hõrak P (1998) Haematological health state indices of reproducing great tits: methodology and sources of natural variation. Funct Ecol 12:700–707
Owens IPF, Bennet PM (2002) Evolutionary ecology of birds. Life histories, mating systems, and extinction. Oxford University Press, New York
Owens IPF, Hartley IR (1998) Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are there so many different forms of dimorphism? Proc R Soc B 265:397–407
Peig J, Green AJ (2009) New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos 118:1883–1891
Pickett SRA, Weber SB, McGraw KJ, Norris KJ, Evans MR (2013) Environmental and parental influences on offspring health and growth in great tits (Parus major). PLoS One 8:e69695
Pomiankowski A (1987) Sexual selection: the handicap principle does work - sometimes. Proc R Soc B 231:123–145
Price JJ, Whalen LM (2009) Plumage evolution in the oropendolas and caciques: different divergence rates in polygynous and monogamous taxa. Evolution 63:2985–2998
Prum RO (2017) The evolution of beauty. Doubleday, New York
Queller D, Goodnight K (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275
Read AF (1988) Sexual selection and the role of parasites. TREE 3:97–102
Reynolds JD (1996) Animal breeding systems. TREE 2:68–72
Reynolds JD, Gros MR (1990) Costs and benefits of female mate choice: is there a lek paradox? Am Nat 136:230–243
Ritschard M, Brumm H (2012) Zebra finch song reflects current food availability. Evol Ecol 26:801–812
Roulin A (2016) Condition-dependence, pleiotropy and the handicap principle of sexual selection in melanin-based colouration. Biol Rev 91:328–348
Ryan MJ (1990) Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxf Surv Evol Biol 7:157–195
Schaefer HM, Ruxton GD (2015) Signal diversity, sexual selection, and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 46:573–592
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675
Sewall KB, Soha JA, Peters S, Nowicki S (2013) Potential trade-off between vocal ornamentation and spatial ability in a songbird. Biol Lett 9:20130344
Shawkey MD, Pillai SR, Hill GE (2009) Do feather-degrading bacteria affect sexually selected plumage color? Naturwissenschaften 96:123–128
Sheldon BC (1994) Male phenotype, fertility, and the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds. Proc R Soc B 257:25–30
Sick H (2001) Ornitologia brasileira. Editora Nova Fronteira, Rio de Janeiro
Sicsú P, Manica LT, Maia R, Macedo RH (2013) Here comes the sun: multimodal display are associated with sunlight incidence. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1633–1642
Sloss MW, Kemp RL, Zajac AM (1999) Parasitologia clínica veterinária, 6th edn. Editora Manole Ltd, São Paulo
Stutchbury BJM, Morton ES (2001) Behavioral ecology of tropical birds. Academic, San Diego
Trivers R (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine Press, Chicago
Wagner RH (1998) Hidden leks: sexual selection and the clustering of avian territories. In: Parker P, Burley N (eds) Avian reproductive tactics: female and male perspectives, Ornithological monographs, vol 49. American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, pp 123–145
Webber T (1985) Songs, displays, and other behaviour at a courtship gathering of blue-black grassquits. Condor 87:543–546
West-Eberhard JJ (2014) Darwin’s forgotten idea: the social essence of sexual selection. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 46:501–508
Wetton JH, Parkin DT (1991) An association between fertility and cuckoldry in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus. Proc R Soc B 245:227–233
Wingfield JC, Maney DL, Breuner CW, Jacobs JD, Lynn S, Ramenofsky M, Richardson RD (1998) Ecological bases of hormone-behavior interactions: the “emergency life history stage”. Am Zool 38:191–206
Yom-Tov Y (2001) An updated list and some comments on the occurrence of intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Ibis 143:133–143
Yuta T, Koizumi I (2016) Does nest predation risk affect the frequency of extra-pair paternity in a socially monogamous passerine? J Avian Biol 47:153–158
Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection – a selection for handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214
Zahavi A (1977) The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). J Theor Biol 67:603–605
Zuk M (2016) Temperate assumptions: how where we work influences how we think. Am Nat 188:S1–S7
Zuk M, Garcia-Gonzalez F, Herberstein ME, Simmons LW (2014) Model systems, taxonomic bias, and sexual selection: beyond Drosophila. Annu Rev Entomol 59:321–338
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Juan C. Reboreda, Vanina D. Fiorini, and Diego T. Tuero, editors of this book, for the invitation to submit a chapter. We thank Jeff Podos and Paulo Llambías for reviewing a previous version of this chapter and providing excellent and creative suggestions for improving the text. We would also like to acknowledge the dozens of undergraduate and graduate students who, through the years, have worked with the grassquits in the lab and in the field.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Macedo, R.H., Manica, L.T. (2019). Sexual Selection and Mating Systems: Contributions from a Neotropical Passerine Model. In: Reboreda, J., Fiorini, V., Tuero, D. (eds) Behavioral Ecology of Neotropical Birds. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14280-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14280-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14279-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14280-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)