Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk Methodology to Assess and Control Aircraft Noise Impact in Vicinity of the Airports

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Aviation

Abstract

Analytical modelling of system safety and risk methodology is used to describe the relationships between the causes, dangers and effects of aircraft noise impact in various scenarios of aviation system development. Risk is assessed according to the hazard identification, associated with the probability of adverse events and their consequences, but the main emphasize is done on noise annoyance. The approach uses two types of risk in principle: individual and societal. A number of events must occur if a main stressor should take place with conditional probability of their realization. Dose-response function is applied to estimate the damage in an exposed receptor, and mathematically it gives a relationship between the intensity of the stressor and the effects in the exposed receptor. Framework for risk assessment and reduction concerning the control of a number of annoyed people by noise is proposed also. Hazard, vulnerability and coping capacity are interpreted in accordance with new requirements of the standard ISO 31000:2018.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Last J (1987) Public Health and Human Ecology. Appleton and Lange, East Norwalk

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weltgesundheitsorganisation. Regionalbüro für Europa (2018) Environmental noise guidelines for European region. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zaporozhets O, et al (2014) Interdependency analysis of current and future criteria and their limits for aircraft noise control in urban areas. Acoustic climate inside and outside buildings, international conference, 23–26 Sept 2014, Vilnius, Lithuania, abstract number: Acoustic 14

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kazhan К, Tokarev V (2009) The optimal noise modelling in the airport vicinity. 9th international conference on theoretical and computational acoustics, 7–9 Sept 2009 proceedings, Dresden. pp 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zaporozhets O, Tokarev V, Attenborough K (2011) Aircraft noise: assessment, prediction and control. Glyph International, Taylor & Francis; CRC Press, 2017, ISBN 9781138073029, CAT# K33865

    Google Scholar 

  6. Noisy areas may reduce life expectancy, study shows (2015) Chicago Tribune, July 15 2015. http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/health/sc-hlth-701-noisy-neighborhoods-life-expectancy-20150625-story.html

  7. Berglund B et al (1999) Guidelines for community noise. World Health Organization, Geneva, http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66217

  8. ICAO Resolution A39-1 (2016) Consolidated statement of continuing ICAO policies and practices related to environmental protection – general provisions, noise and local air quality ICAO resolutions adopted by the assembly, Provisional edition, Oct 2016, 138 p

    Google Scholar 

  9. UNISDR (2016) Exposure and vulnerability short concept note: work stream 2, working group 2. UNISDR science and technology conference on the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. 27–29 Jan 2016, Geneva International Conference Centre

    Google Scholar 

  10. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (2009) UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. UNISDR, Geneva, p 35

    Google Scholar 

  11. ISO 31000:2018. Risk management – guidelines. 2018-02, 18 p

    Google Scholar 

  12. Birkmann J (ed) (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations, University Press, Tokyo, New York, Paris, 524 pp

    Google Scholar 

  13. van Westen CJ, Greiving S (2017) Multi-hazard risk assessment and decision making. In: Dalezios NR (ed) Environmental hazards methodologies for risk assessment and management. IWA Publishing, London, pp 31–94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Zaporozhets O, Blyukher B (2016) Hazard analysis and risk assessment methodology: generalized model. In: Encyclopedia of soil science, 3rd edn. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1081/E-ESS3-120053900

  15. Flindell I et al (2013) Understanding UK community annoyance with aircraft noise. ANASE update study report for 2M Group, Ian Flindell & Associates

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zaporozhets OI, Khaidar HA (2001) Instruments and procedures for management of aviation safety provision. Visnyk of the National Aviation University, Kyiv, 6(1): 186–189

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morselt T, Evenhuis E (2006) Review standaardmethode schade en slachtoff ers, Rebel Group in opdracht Rijkswaterstaat, Dienst Weg en Waterbouwkunde, Rotterdam, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  18. Basner M (2014) Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet 383(9925):1325–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Griefahn B, Scheuch K (2004) Protection goals for residents in the vicinity of civil airports. Noise Health 6(24):51–62

    Google Scholar 

  20. American Chemical Society (1998) Understanding risk analysis. A short guide for health, safety, and environmental policy making. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. Internet edition, www.rff.org/rff/publications/upload/14418_1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  21. EPA (1973) Public health and welfare criteria for noise. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Noise Abatement and Control (ONAC), report EPA550/9-73-002, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miedema HME, Vos H (1998) Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise. J Acoust Soc Am 104:3432–3445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ISO 1996-1 (2016) Acoustics—description, measurement and assessment of environmental sound—part 1: basic quantities and assessment procedures, International Standard ISO 1996-1. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shaw EAG (1996) Noise environments outdoors and the effects of community noise exposure. Noise Control Eng 44(3):109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Guski R (1999) Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance. Noise & Health 1(3):45–56

    Google Scholar 

  26. Guski R et al (2017) WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: a systematic review on environmental noise and annoyance. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:1539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aircraft Noise and Annoyance (2018) Recent findings CAP 1588. Civil Aviation Authority

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fidell S (2003) The Schultz curve 25 years later: a research perspective. J Acoust Soc Am 114(6):3007–3015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. WHO (2009) Night noise guidelines for Europe. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wirth K, Brink M, Schierz C, Aircraft noise annoyance at different times of day. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228790089

  31. Schultz TJ (1979) Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. J Acoust Soc Am 65:849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Miedema HM, Oudshoorn CG (2001) Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ Health Perspect 109(4):409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gjestland T, Gelderblom FB (2017) Prevalence of noise induced annoyance and its dependency on number of aircraft movements. Acta Acustica United Acustica 103:28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. ICAO white paper on noise (2018) CAEP/11-WP/xx, draft. 41 p

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jagnatinskas A, Fiks B, Zaporozhets O, Kartyshev O (2011) Aircraft noise assessment in the vicinity of airports with different descriptors. Inter-noise-2011, Osaka, Japan, 4–7 Sept 2011

    Google Scholar 

  36. Scheuch K, Griefahn B, Jansen G, Spreng M (2003) Evaluation criteria for aircraft noise. Rev Environ Health 18(3):185–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Job RFS (1988) Community response to noise: a review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction. J Acoust Soc Am 83:991–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Taylor SM (1984) A path model of aircraft noise annoyance? J Sound Vib 96:243–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Alexandre A (1976) An assessment of certain causal models used in surveys on aircraft noise annoyance. J Sound Vib 44:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Flindell IH, Stallen PJM (1999) Non-acoustical factors in environmental noise. Noise Health 1(3):11–16

    Google Scholar 

  41. ACARE (2012) Realising Europe’s vision for aviation. Strateg Res Innov Agenda 1, 150 p. www.acare4europe.org

  42. Fidell S, Piersons KS (1997) Community response to environmental noise. In: Crocker MJ (ed) Encyclopaedia of acoustics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  43. Stallen PJM (1999) A theoretical framework for environmental noise annoyance. Noise Health 1

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zaporozhets O (2014) Criteria for aircraft noise control around airports and their role in reaching the strategic goals in environmental protection from aviation impact. Acoustic climate inside and outside buildings, international conference, 23–26 Sept 2014, Vilnius, Lithuania, abstract number: Acoustic 09

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kroesen M, Molin EJE, van Wee B (2008) Testing a theory of aircraft noise annoyance: a structural equation analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 123(6): 4250–4260

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schomer PD (2005) Criteria for assessment of noise annoyance. Noise Control Eng J 53(4):132–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Guski R (2017) The increase of aircraft noise annoyance in communities. Causes and consequences, ISBEN-2017, Keynote lecture, Zurich, 12 p

    Google Scholar 

  48. Vader R (2007) D/R&D 07/026 Noise annoyance mitigation at airports by non-acoustic measures

    Google Scholar 

  49. ICAO (2004) Guidance on the balanced approach to aircraft noise management. ICAO Doc 9829, AN/451, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  50. Woodward JM, Lassman Briscoe L, Dunholter P (2009) Aircraft noise: a toolkit for managing community expectations. ACRP report 15, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  51. ICAO Circular 351 (2016) Community engagement for aviation environmental management. ICAO Cir. 351-AT/194, 2017

  52. Review of noise abatement procedure research & development and implementation results. Discussion of survey results ICAO preliminary edition – 2007, 29 p

    Google Scholar 

  53. Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, OJ L 189, 18.7.2002

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fleming GG, Ziegler URF (2013) Environmental trends in aviation to 2050. ICAO 2013 Environmental Report

    Google Scholar 

  55. Janssen SA, Vos H, van Kempen EE, Breugelmans OR, Miedema HM (2011) Trends in aircraft noise annoyance: the role of study and sample characteristics. J Acoust Soc Am 129(4)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nationasl Aviation University, Institute of Environmental Safety, Kyiv, Ukraine

    Oleksandr Zaporozhets

  2. Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN, USA

    Boris Blyukher

Authors
  1. Oleksandr Zaporozhets
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Boris Blyukher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oleksandr Zaporozhets .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Eskisehir Technical Univeristy, Eskisehir, Turkey

    T. Hikmet Karakoc

  2. Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Buca, Izmir, Turkey

    C. Ozgur Colpan

  3. Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Eskisehir Technical Univeristy, Eskisehir, Turkey

    Onder Altuntas

  4. Airframe & Powerplant Maintenance, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey

    Yasin Sohret

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zaporozhets, O., Blyukher, B. (2019). Risk Methodology to Assess and Control Aircraft Noise Impact in Vicinity of the Airports. In: Karakoc, T., Colpan, C., Altuntas, O., Sohret, Y. (eds) Sustainable Aviation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14195-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14195-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14194-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14195-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation