Advertisement

Disaster and Deserts: Children’s Natural History as Nightmare and Dream

  • Naomi WoodEmail author
Chapter
  • 161 Downloads

Abstract

Charles Kingsley’s last work for children, the informational book Madam How and Lady Why (1869), treats questions of geology, geography, evolution, theodicy, and epistemology. Like other Victorian popular science, one goal is to integrate the claims of science with those of religion. But it does not do so by domesticating the natural world in any conventional sense. Earthquakes destroy towns and kill innocent people; volcanoes erupt, continents shift, and even a peaceful landscape may mask a genocidal struggle. Such is Kingsley’s personification of natural process Madam How’s way: she demands exertion. Adelene Buckland has shown how Kingsley structures novels using the geological record as a model, so too in Madam How and Lady Why, Kingsley’s informational-narrative treatment melds different generic “strata” to depict the epistemological process as similarly multilayered. As long-past volcanic activity or coral reefs are discerned in the peaceful landscape of southern England, so past truths expressed in imaginative genres may erupt into scientific observation and inductive reasoning. Kingsley’s efforts do not maintain the literal truth of the Bible in a fundamentalist sense, however. Warning against the dangers of the “Tree of Unreason” (a marked departure from Genesis and the story of the Fall), Kingsley champions learning from the “Book of Nature” by direct observation, free inquiry, and experimentation. The greatest sin is not desire for (carnal) knowledge, but failure to reason and act. Kingsley’s figurative language, such as his feminine personifications, places his implied readership of English schoolboys in a simultaneously dependent and erotic relationship to knowledge. Championing exertion and struggle, Kingsley implicitly endorses the British imperial project and naturalizes domination over the global South. Kingsley warns against ignoring material facts in favor of abstract theorizing or looking for divine abrogation of natural laws, since they are in effect God’s fiction—God’s word made world.

Works Cited

  1. Bark, Debbie. “Science for Children.” The Routledge Research Companion to Nineteenth-Century British Literature and Science, edited by John Holmes and Sharon Ruston. Routledge, 2017, pp. 187–200.Google Scholar
  2. Beer, Gillian. Darwin’s Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. Blaut, J.M. The Colonizer’s Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History. Guildford P, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. Buckland, Adelene. “Kingsley’s Cataclysmic Method.” Novel Science: Fiction and the Invention of Nineteenth-Century Geology. U of Chicago P, 2013, pp. 179–220.Google Scholar
  5. Hamlin, Christopher. “Charles Kingsley: From Being Green to Green Being.” Victorian Studies, vol. 52, no. 2, 2012, pp. 255–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Keene, Melanie. Science in Wonderland: The Scientific Fairy Tales of Victorian Britain. Oxford UP, 2015.Google Scholar
  7. Kelley, William. “Nature and Religion: Recovering Canon Kingsley.” Journal of Ecclesiastical History, vol. 64, no. 3, July 2014, pp. 620–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kingsley, Charles. Madam How and Lady Why, or First Lessons in Earth Lore for Children. Macmillan, 1890.Google Scholar
  9. ———. The Water-Babies. Edited by Richard Kelly. Broadview Editions, 2008.Google Scholar
  10. Kingsley, Frances Grenville. Letters & Memories of Charles Kingsley, Edited by His Wife. Novels, Poems & Letters of Charles Kingsley. The Bideford Edition. 2 vols. Co-operative Publication Society, J.F. Taylor, 1899.Google Scholar
  11. Lamb, Charles. The Letters of Charles Lamb: With a Sketch of His Life, 2 vols. Edited by Thomas Noon Talfourd. Moxon, 1837.Google Scholar
  12. Mukherjee, Upamanyu Pablo. Natural Disasters and Victorian Empire: Famines, Fevers and the Literary Cultures of South Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
  13. Prickett, Stephen. Narrative, Religion and Science: Fundamentalism Versus Irony, 1700–1999. Cambridge UP, 2002.Google Scholar
  14. Proverbs. The Bible. Authorized King James Version. Oxford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. Prystash, Justin. “Rhizomatic Subjects: Thomas Carlyle, Charles Kingsley, and the Origins of Victorian Identity.” Nineteenth-Century Literature, vol. 66, no. 2, 2011, pp. 141–69.Google Scholar
  16. Schiefelbein, Michael. “‘Blighted’ by a ‘Upas-Shadow’: Catholicism’s Function for Kingsley in Westward Ho!Victorian Newsletter, no. 94, Fall 1998, pp. 10–17.Google Scholar
  17. Straley, Jessica. “Of Beasts and Boys: Kingsley, Spencer, and the Theory of Recapitulation.” Victorian Studies, vol. 49, no. 4, Summer 2007, pp. 583–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Talairach-Vielmas, Laurence. “From the Wonders of Nature to the Wonders of Evolution: Charles Kingsley’s Nursery Fairies.” Fairy Tales, Natural History, and Victorian Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, pp. 15–46.Google Scholar
  19. Tennyson, Alfred. The Poems of Tennyson. Edited by Christopher Ricks. 2nd ed. Norton, 1982.Google Scholar
  20. Wood, Naomi. “(Em)Bracing Icy Mothers: Ideology, Identity, and Environment in Children’s Fantasy.” Wild Things: Children’s Culture and Ecocriticism, edited by Sidney I. Dobrin and Kenneth B. Kidd. Wayne State UP, 2004, pp. 198–214.Google Scholar
  21. ———. “A (Sea) Green Victorian: Charles Kingsley and The Water-Babies.” The Lion and the Unicorn, vol. 19, no. 2, 1995, pp. 233–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zimmerman, Virginia. “Natural History on Blocks, in Bodies, and on the Hearth: Juvenile Science Literature and Games, 1850–1875.” Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science and Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, 2011, pp. 401–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations