Human Intervention and More-Than-Human Humanity in H. G. Wells’s The Island of Doctor Moreau

  • Shun Yin KiangEmail author


Taking into account Wells’s essays on a wide range of subjects as context, and in conversation with recent ecocriticism on ecological imagination and the Anthropocene, this essay locates in Doctor Moreau a fascination with a humanity that gestures outwards, one that imagines itself a part of alternative ideas, things, and spaces that collectively push the idea and boundary of the properly human to its epistemological limits. Bio-diverse and bizarre, the humanity—or, rather, humanities (Moreau’s, Montgomery’s, the Beast Folk’s, for example)—that Doctor Moreau apprehends and interacts with, speaks to Wells’s commitment to conceptualizing humanity as something relational, animal-human, and difficult to categorize and contain. More specifically, this essay brings into dialogue between Wells’s many essays and remarks on science and society and Doctor Moreau itself to gauge and comment on the writer’s scientifically informed humanism, which represents, in many ways, a caution against a positivism that reduces rather than respects the diversity and interconnectedness of things. In doing so, this essay focuses on two interrelated tasks: first, to track and analyze Prendick’s humanist struggles with, and his developing responses to, Moreau’s interventionist logic and the uncanny ways of the Beast Folk and second, to argue that Prendick’s questioning of the animal-human divide and its presumed ontological status are bound up with a fascination and grappling with a more-than-human humanity that calls into question the artificiality and absurdity of what it purports to be human.

Works Cited

  1. Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke UP, 2010.Google Scholar
  2. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 35, no. 2, Winter 2009, pp. 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Edwards, Ronald. The Edge of Evolution: Animality, Inhumanity, & Doctor Moreau. Oxford UP, 2016.Google Scholar
  4. James, Simon J. Maps of Utopia: H. G. Wells, Modernity and the End of Culture. Oxford UP, 2012.Google Scholar
  5. Morton, Timothy. Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence. Columbia UP, 2016.Google Scholar
  6. ———. The Ecological Thought. Harvard UP, 2012.Google Scholar
  7. Philmus, Robert, and David Y. Hughes, eds. Early Writings in Science Fiction by H. G. Wells. U of California P, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. Trexler, Adam. Anthropocene Fictions: The Novel in a Time of Climate Change. U of Virginia P, 2015.Google Scholar
  9. Watt, Ian. The Rise of the Novel. 2nd ed. U of California P, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. Wells, H. G. “Ancient Experiments in Co-operation.” Philmus and Hughes, pp. 187–93.Google Scholar
  11. ———. “Bio-Optimism.” Philmus and Hughes, pp. 206–10.Google Scholar
  12. ———. “The Contemporary Novel.” Wells, An Englishman, pp. 63–72.Google Scholar
  13. ———. An Englishman Looks at the World: Being a Series of Unrestrained Remarks Upon Contemporary Matters. Edited by Taylor Anderson. Odin’s Library Classics, 2017.Google Scholar
  14. ———. “Human Evolution, an Artificial Process.” Philmus and Hughes, pp. 211–19.Google Scholar
  15. ———. The Island of Doctor Moreau. Penguin, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. ———. “The Limits of Individual Plasticity.” Philmus and Hughes, pp. 36–9.Google Scholar
  17. ———. “The Province of Pain.” Philmus and Hughes, pp. 194–9.Google Scholar
  18. ———. “The So-Called Science of Sociology.” Anderson, pp. 80–7.Google Scholar
  19. ———. “Zoological Retrogression.” Philmus and Hughes, pp. 158–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Central OklahomaEdmondUSA

Personalised recommendations