Skip to main content

The Alongside

Outwith: Approaches from the Decolonial, Feminist and Gender Studies, Indigenous Knowing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Politics of Practice

Part of the book series: Performance Philosophy ((PPH))

  • 192 Accesses

Abstract

Many disciplinary areas since the middle of the twentieth century have attempted to articulate alongside worlds of the sociosituated. Decolonial critics, writers on feminist and gender studies, and speakers from traditions of indigenous knowledge have offered some of the approaches that have been developing concepts for recognising the many ways of living alterior to discourse. These theorists have much to offer to performers and performance, as well as to performance studies. The emphases in these approaches on the way that difference happens or is made rather than found, and on the radical not-knowing involved in people’s relations with things in the world, have coalesced around philosophies of process, and contributed to the ways that critics also sustain sociosituated performativity in their critical writing through both documenting and articulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Throughout my recent publications, I have consistently rendered this moment with the internal bracket, as ‘a(rest’ (Hunter 2011), because it is not a halting, or a stasis—as ‘arrest’ might indicate. Instead, it is a performative rest within a moment that tries to articulate something previously unsaid before necessarily moving on because the moment it is articulated, it changes. Yet ‘a(rest’ cannot ignore ‘arrest’, so I have moved to ‘(rest’.

  2. 2.

    These are quite precisely the elements in negative rhetoric; in other words, the rhetoric of coercion and manipulation rather than persuasion, see L. Hunter (1984, chapter 1).

  3. 3.

    Situated knowing theory is partly embedded into early-twentieth-century process philosophies articulated by Husserl, Bergson, Wittgenstein, Deleuze and Guattari, but key to the politics of situated knowing and the sociosituated is the 1930–50 research on working-class artmaking that derives from Michael Bakhtin, W. E. B. DuBois, György Lukács, Richard Hoggart, Henri Lefevre, Raymond Williams, Stuart Hall. All of these writers were trying to account for the lack of political theory relevant to those who had not held power before the enfranchisements of the twentieth century. Similar theoretical quests can be found in the work of Simone de Beauvoir, but records of other quests are hard to come by until the 1960s because by definition people not belonging to socioculturally recognised groups did not get formally educated to produce published academic work.

  4. 4.

    In the 1950s, John von Neuman took up the word ‘singularity’ to describe the moment at which artificial intelligence becomes a super-intelligence that can control people. Ray Kurzweil presents a more recent version of this (Kurzweil 2005).

  5. 5.

    Quoted by Povinelli (2011, 33), from J. Butler, ‘What is Critique?’, in ed. David Ingram, The Political: Blackwell Readings in Continental Philosophy (London: Basil Blackwell, 212–226).

  6. 6.

    In an article specifically replying to Stengers, from an indigenous perspective, Marisol de la Cadena outlines an alterior politics (2010).

  7. 7.

    A ‘set toward’ is a concept introduced by French theorists in the 1970s, and brought into discourse theory by a number of writers in English in the 1980s such as Diane Macdonell (1986). It indicates an ethos position that a group takes up with regards to a specific aspect of hegemonic power that it has decided to address. Sara Ahmed’s concept (2006) of ‘orientation’ is a current delineation with much to add to the critical concept, although it also includes strategies for positionality in her expansion of ‘contingency’.

  8. 8.

    For example, Michel Serres uses ‘fuzzy set’ to distinguish from ‘concept’ (Serres 1982, 9 + 56ff and 147ff).

  9. 9.

    Deleuze brings Foucault’s ‘dispositif’ or disposition and ‘agencement’ closely together in something like the use of ‘positionality’ here (Legg 2011, 128).

  10. 10.

    In suggesting this I am drawing on Brian Massumi’s explication of the co-composition of qualitative-relationality (Massumi 2011, introduction).

  11. 11.

    One of the initial writings considers the practices of a dancer and of a musician (Hunter 2016a).

  12. 12.

    These like-minded groups are more in tune with Dorothy Smith’s concept of communities based on ‘particularised ties’ (Smith 1987, 3) than Hans-Georg Gadamer’s small groups who practice consensual reasoning within their community, something he refers to as ‘solidarity’ (Gadamer 1976, 87). The former is collaborative; the latter, collective.

  13. 13.

    This is a distinction to which Povinelli may gesture in her comments on ‘chosen’ and ‘involuntary’ alternative publics (Povinelli 2011, 8); in any event, I have a number of concerns with placing the ‘Australian aboriginal’ as involuntarily alternative to ‘choice’.

References

  • Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, Stacy. 2008. Trans-corporeal Feminisms. In Material Feminisms, ed. Stacy Alaimo and Susan Hekman. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Bodily Natures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, Etienne. 2002. What Is a Border? In Politics and the Other Scene, trans. Chris Turner. London: Verso, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, Karen. 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. Field, B. McVicker Clinchy, N. Rule Goldberger, and J. Mattuck Tarule. 1986. Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. The Generalized and the Concrete Other. In Ethics: A Feminist Reader, ed. E. Fraser, J. Hornsby, and S. Lovibond. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, Rey. 2006. The Age of the World Target. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Code, Lorraine. 1995. Gossip. In Rhetorical Spaces in Gendered Locations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Cadena, Marisol. 2010. Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections Beyond “Politics”. Cultural Anthropology 25 (2): 334–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1980. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1997. The Animal that Therefore I Am. Translated by David Wills and edited by Maire-Luise Mallet. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. D’Ailleurs [Elsewhere]. Director Safaa Fathy, Gloria Films, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumit, Joseph. 2012. Drugs for Life: How Pharmaceutical Companies Define Our Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fahnestock, Jeanne. 2002. Rhetorical Figures in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Keller, Evelyn. 1992. Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender and Science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1976. Reason in the Age of Science. Translated by F. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Lynette. 1984. Rhetorical Stance, Allegories of Love and Death. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Outsider Notes: Feminist Approaches to Canadian Publishing, Writers and Readers, 1960–1990. Vancouver: Talonbooks/Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Critiques of Knowing: Situated Textualities in Science, Computing and the Arts. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Equality as Difference: Storytelling in/of Nunavut. International Journal of Canadian Studies 39 (3): 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Preparing, Sharing and Eating Food in Panniqtuuq, Nunavut. In Food and Community: Moving Wor(l)ds, ed. Lynette Hunter, 145–168. Leeds: University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. A Logic of Participles. Artistic Research in Action CARPA2, 11–22. Helsinki: Theatre Academy Publications. 42: 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Disunified Aesthetics: Situated Textuality, Performativity, Collaboration. Montréal: McGill Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016a. Ethics, Performativity, and Gender: Porous and Expansive Concepts of Selving in the Performance Work of Gretchen Jude and of Nicole Peisl. Palgrave Communications. Palgrave Macmillan, 2:16006. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/articles/palcomms20166; https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.6

  • ———. 2016b. Sentient Performativities. In Sentient Performativities of Embodiment: Thinking Alongside the Human, ed. Elisabeth Krimmer, Lynette Hunter, and Peter Lichtenfels, 1–18. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016c. Listening to Writing: Performativity in Strategies Developed by Learning from Indigenous Yukon Discourse. Journal of Canadian Studies 50 (1): 36–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosofsky-Sedgwick, Eve. 2003. Touching, Feeling. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, Ray. 2005. The Singularity is Near. Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg, Stephen. 2011. Assemblage/Apparatus: Using Deleuze and Foucault. Area 43 (2): 128–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepecki, André. 2006. Exhausting Dance: Performance and the Politics of Movement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 1974. Otherwise than Being: Or Beyond Essence. Translated and introduced by Alphonso Lingis. Duquesne University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugones, Maria. 2010. Toward a Decolonial Feminism. Hypatia 25 (4): 742–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonell, Diane. 1986. Theories of Discourse. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Erin. 2006. Politics of Touch: Sense, Movement, Sovereignty. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Always More than One: Individuation’s Dance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Erin, and Brian Massumi. 2014. Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Doreen. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, Brian. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Semblance and Event: Activist Philosophy and the Occurrent Arts. London: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The Politics of Affect. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter. 2000. Local Histories/Global Designs: Essays on the Coloniality of Power, Subaltern Knowledges and Border Thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minh-Ha, Trinh T. 2010. Elsewhere, within Here: Immigration, Refugeeism and the Boundary Event. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, José Esteban. 1999. Disidentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, Elizabeth. 2001. Radical Worlds: The Anthropology of Incommensurability and Inconceivability. Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puar, Jasbir. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. I Would Rather Be a Cyborg Than a Goddess: Becoming-Intersectional in Assemblage Theory. PhiloSOPHIA: Journal of Feminist Philosophy 2 (1): 50–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, Alan. 1993. Theatre and Everyday Life. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Hilary. 1994. Love, Power and Knowledge: Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Sciences. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, Michel. 1982. The Parasite. Translated by Lawrence Scher. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dorothy. 1987. The Everyday World as Problematic. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Texts, Facts, and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, Isabelle. 1996–1997. Cosmopolitics: PostHumanities. Translated by Robert Bonnono. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Shawn. 2008. Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Winnipeg and Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynette Hunter .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hunter, L. (2019). The Alongside. In: Politics of Practice. Performance Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14019-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics