Skip to main content

The Process of Development: The Contribution of Régulation Theory

Abstract

Development is not the search for an optimal static macro-equilibrium but it derives from the art of creating, if not miracles, at least virtuous circles in which social values, organizations, institutions and technological systems co-evolve. Development modes are therefore built upon the discovery of possible institutional arrangements that fulfil two conditions: the viability of the accumulation process and a political legitimacy around an implicit or explicit institutionalized compromise. The survey of economic history reveals a limited number of these modes: import substitution development, export-led, foreign direct investment-led and finally based upon low wage and poor welfare. Contemporary China explores a genuine development mode built upon the acute competition between a myriad of local corporatism under the aegis of a party-State. Most of these modes rely upon the resilience of an open world economy. Its stability is not guaranteed given the obstacles to the defense of global public goods and to the creation of new Commons. Last but not least, the merits of an anthropogenetic model based on education, health and culture should not be underestimated.

Keywords

  • Development mode
  • Regulation theory
  • Accumulation regime
  • Institutionalized compromise
  • Viability

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_6
  • Chapter length: 51 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-14000-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 6.1
Fig. 6.2
Fig. 6.3
Fig. 6.4
Fig. 6.5
Fig. 6.6
Fig. 6.7
Fig. 6.8
Fig. 6.9
Fig. 6.10

References

  • Aboites J. (1986). Régime d’accumulation, rapport salarial et crises au Mexique (1940–1982), ronéotypé, Cepremap, mai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, M. (1979) Rapid growth potential and its realization: The experience of capitalist economies in the postwar period. In E. Malinvaud (Dir.), Economic growth and resources, the major issues. Londres: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, M. (1986, June). Catching-up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46(2), 385–406.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aglietta, M. (1982). Regulation and crisis of capitalism, Monthly Review Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amable, B. (2003). The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Amable, B., Barré, R., & Boyer, R. (1997). Les systèmes d’innovation à l’ère de la globalisation. Paris: OST/Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amable, B., Guillaud, E., & Palombarini, S. (2012). L’Économie politique du néolibéralisme. Le cas de la France et de l’Italie. Paris: Editions de l’ENS, rue d’Ulm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. (1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (2001). Towards a comparative institutional analysis, Mimeo, Stanford University, juillet 2000 (à paraître, MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2012). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty, Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1996). Democracy and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 1–27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Benassy, J. P. (1983). The economics of market disequilibrium. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, H. (1978). Une nouvelle approche de la croissance française de l’après-guerre: l’analyse en sections productives. Économie & Prévision Année, 1978(35), 3–36. http://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0338-4217_1978_num_35_1_2268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borras, S., & Seebrooke, L. (2015). Sense-making and institutional change. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (1990). The régulation school: A critical introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (1994). Do labour institutions matter for economic development? A régulation approach for the OECD and Latin America with an extension to Asia. In G. dans Rodgers (Ed.), Workers, Institutions and Economic Growth in Asia (pp. 25–112). Genève: ILO/ILLS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (1997). The variety of unequal performance of really existing markets: Farewell to doctor pangloss? In J.-R. dans Hollingsworth & R. Boyer (Eds.), Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions (pp. 55–93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (2002). L’après consensus de Washington: institutionnaliste et systémique ? L’Année de la régulation 2001–2002, Vol. 5, p. 13–56. (Presses de Sciences PO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (2006). Half a century of development theories: an institutionalist survey. In G. Stathakis & G. Vaggi (Eds.), Economic development and social change: Historical roots and modern perspectives (pp. 29–73). Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (2011a). A new epoch but still diversity within and between capitalism: China in comparative perspective. In C. Lane & G. T. Wood (Eds.), Capitalist diversity and diversity within capitalism (pp. 32–68). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (2011b). Les financiers détruiront-ils le capitalisme ? Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (2012). Diversité et évolution des capitalismes en Amérique latine. De la régulation économique au politique, Revue de la régulation [Online], 11 | 1er semestre / Spring 2012, Online since 03 May 2012, connection on 21 February 2018. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/9720.

  • Boyer, R. (2012a). The four fallacies of contemporary austerity policies: The lost Keynesian legacy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36, 283–312.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (2015a). Economie politique des capitalismes. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (2015b). Transformación del Estado y paradigmas de desarrollo en América Latina, Capítulo XI, in Neoestructuralismo y corrientes heterodoxas en América Latina a inicios del siglo XXI, CEPAL, Enero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer R. (2017b). Les théories économiques contemporaines à l’épreuve de la trajectoire chinoise. Revue de la Régulation, [En ligne], 21 | 1er semestre / Spring 2017, mis en ligne le 05 septembre 2017, consulté le 16 février 2018. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/12319; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/regulation.12319.

  • Boyer, R. (2018). Expectations, Narratives, and Socio-Economic Regimes. In J. Becker & R. Bronk (Eds.), Uncertain Futures: Imaginaries, Narratives and Calculation in the Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R., & Neffa, J. C. (Eds.). (2004). La crisis argentina (1976–2001): una vision desde la theorias institucionalistas y regulacionistas. Editorial Mino y Davila Madrid: Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R., & Neffa, J. C. (Eds.). (2007). Salida de crisis y estrategias alternativas de desarollo. La experiencia argentina. Mino y Davila Madrid et: Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R., & Orléan, A. (1992). How do conventions evolve? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2, 165–177.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R., & Saillard, Y. (2001). Regulation Theory: The State of the Art. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1979). Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme XV-XVIIIe siècles, 3 tomes, Paris, Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2009). Mondialisation et compétition: Pourquoi certains pays émergents réussissent et d’autres non. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (Coord.) (2010), Ten theses on New Developmentalism, São Paulo School of Economics of Getulio, Vargas Foundation, Development Macroeconomics Center, May 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, F. H. (2001). Charting a new course: The politics of globalization and social transformation. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassiers, I. (Ed.). (2011). Redéfinir la prospérité. Jalons pour un débat. Editions de l’Aube: Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPAL. (2012). Cambio Estructural para la Igualdad. Una visión integrada del desarrollo. Santiago, Chile: Nations Unies.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPAL. (2015). Neoestructuralismo y corrientes heterodoxas en Amecirana Latina y el Caraibes a los inicios del siglo XXI, Alica Barcena y Antonio Prado (Eds), Libros de la CEPAL, n° 132 (LC/G.2633-P), Santiago de Chile, Comision Economica para America Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekar, C. P. (2016). Development planning. In E. S. Reinert, J. Gosh, & R. Kattel (Eds.), Handbook of alternative theories of economic development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavance, B. (2017). Ownership transformation and system change in China, Revue de la régulation [En ligne], 21 | 1er semestre / Spring 2017, mis en ligne le 20 juin 2017, consulté le 16 février 2018. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/12298; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/regulation.12298.

  • Combarnous, F., & Rougier, E. (Eds.). (2017). The diversity of emerging capitalisms globalization, institutional convergence and experimentation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2006). Education and health: Evaluating theories and evidence (Working paper NBER 12352). http://www.nber.org/papers/w12352

  • Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). Commun. Essai sur la révolution au XXIe siècle. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. (1999). Complex dynamics; An introduction to macroeconomic dynamics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto Polar, H. (2000), El misterio del capital: ¿Por qué el capitalismo triunfa en occidente y fracasa en el resto del mundo?.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto Polar, H. (2006), Realizing property rights, Frank/Wynkin de Worde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of value. An axiomatic analysis of general equilibrium. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, S. (2007). The new famines: Why famines persist in an era of globalization. Abingdon: Routledge Studies in Development Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Alejandro, C.F. (1985). Good-bye Financial Repression, Hello Financial Crash, Journal of Development Economics, 19, reprinted in A. Velasco (ed.), Trade, Development and the World Economy: Selected Essays of Carlos Díaz-Alejandro, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping Andersen, G. (2008). Childhood investments and skill formation. International tax and Public Finance, 15, 14–49.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fourquet, F. (2018). Penser la longue durée. Contribution à une histoire de la mondialisation. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo, J. (2008). La economía de Michael Kalecki y el capitalismo actual: ensayos de teoría económica y economía aplicada. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraud, G. (2017). Construire un monde commun. Les Communs comme projet politique. Conférence 7 mars, http://www.les-communs-dabord.org/conference-de-gael-giraud-construire-monde-commun-communs-projet-politique/

  • Gordon, R. (2016). The rise and fall of American growth. The US standard of living since the civil war. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, E. E. (1982). On the theory of social change. Homewood: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F. (1985). Money, growth and stability. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism, The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harada, Y., & Tohyama, H. (2011). Asian capitalisms: institutional con-figurations and firm Heterogeneity. In R. Boyer, H. Uemura, & A. Isokai (Eds.), Diversity and transformations of Asian capitalisms (pp. 243–263). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R. (1981). State landed property, oil rent and accumulation in the Venezuelan economy, Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. (2014). The Atlas of Economic Complexity: Mapping Paths to Prosperity. Cambridge: Center for International Development (CID) & MIT Media Lab.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., Rodrik, D., Velasco, A. (2005). Growth diagnostics. In The Washington consensus reconsidered: Towards a new global governance (pp. 324–355). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199534098

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, XXXV(4), 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, R., & Boyer, R. (Eds.). (1997). Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingrao, B., & Israel, G. (1990). The invisible hand: Economic equilibrium in the history of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerven, M. (2015). Africa: Why economists get it wrong. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juillard, M. (2002). Régimes d’accumulation », chapitre 22, dans Boyer R & Saillard Y. (ed), La théorie de la régulation: l’état des savoirs, La découverte, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C. P. (1967). French planning. In M. F. Millikan (Ed.), National economic planning (pp. 279–303). Cambridge, MA: NBER. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c1426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (1992). The socialist system, The political economy of communism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1995, September). Development, geography, and economic theory. Ohlin Lectures, ISBN 0-262-11203-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (2001, March 25–26). Crises: The next generation? Razin conference, Tel Aviv University. http://econ.tau.ac.il/research/sapir/Krugman.pdf

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(4), 1113–1155.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origin. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332. http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.2.285.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Labrousse, E., & Braudel, F. (1970). Histoire économique de la société française: 1660–1789, tome 2 Relié, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, Janvier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. (2006, Spring). Why Europe and the West? Why not China? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 3–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lebrun, F. (2002), L’Europe et le monde. XVIe-XVIIIe siècle. Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (2002). Convention. A philosophical study. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. Y. (1995, January). The Needham Puzzle: Why the industrial revolution did not originate in China. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 43(2), 269–292.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • List, F. (1841). The national system of political economy, trad. anglaise par Sampson S. Llyod [1885]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118011690.ch16

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. (1983). Studies in business cycle theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. (1988). On the mechanisms of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 72, Juillet, 3–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. (1993). Making a miracle. Econometrica, 61(2), 251–272.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D., & Millo, Y. (2003). Constructing a market, performing theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 107–145.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (2001). The world economy. A millennial perspective. Paris: OECD.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (2003). The world economy. Historical statistics. Paris: OECD.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Massé, P. (1965). Le Plan ou l’anti-hasard. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990). The economics of modern manufacturing: technology, strategy and organization. American Economic Review, 80(3), 511–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miotti, L., Quenan C. et T. Zane E. (2012). Continuités et ruptures dans l’accumulation et la régulation en Amérique latine dans les années 2000: le cas de l’Argentine, du Brésil et du Chili, Revue de la régulation, n° 11, premier semestre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miotti, L., & Quenan, C. (2004). Analyse des grandes crises structurelles: le cas de l’Argentine. In N. Julio (Ed.), Analises regulationistas de la crisis argentina. Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mjoset, L. (2016). The Nordic route to development. In E. S. Reinert, J. Gosh, & R. Kattel (Eds.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Development (pp. 533–569). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, B. (2007). The Chinese economy: Transition and growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (2016). Economic development as an evolutionary process. In E. S. Reinert, J. Gosh, & R. Kattel (Eds.), Handbook of Alternative theories of economic development (pp. 323–335). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nove, A. (1987). Planned Economy. The new Palgrave. A dictionary of economics, 3, 879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurkse, R. (1953). Problems of capital formation in under-developed countries. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, J., & Bertola, L. (2012). The economic development of Latin America since independence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, J. A., Rada, C., & Taylor, L. (2009). Growth and policy in developing countries: A structuralist approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982). Rise and decline of nation. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ominami, C. (1986). Le Tiers Monde dans la crise. Essai sur la transformation récente des rapports Nord-Sud. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the commons the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E., & Basurto X. (2011). Crafting analytical tools to study institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7, 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137410000305.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard: Belknap Press World.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2015, Winter). Putting distribution back at the center of economics: Reflections on capital in the twenty-first century. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(1), 67–88.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz, K. (2000). The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. (2011). Economic Analysis of Law. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch, R. (1950). The economic development of Latin-America and its principal problems. New York: United Nations, Economic Commission for Latin America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch, R. (1971). Change and development: Latin-America’s great task, report to the Inter American Development Bank. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quémia, M. (2001). Théorie de la régulation et développement: trajectoires latino-américaines. In L’année de la régulation (vol. 5, pp. 57–104). Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. (2004). Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists: Unleashing the Power of Financial Markets to Create Wealth and Spread Opportunity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razafindrakoto, M., Roubaud, F., & Wachsberger, J.-M. (2007), L’énigme et le paradoxe, Économie politique de Madagascar, IRD Éditions/AFD - Collection: Synthèses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, C., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This Time is Different: Eight-Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Revue d’Économie du Dévelopement. (2000), Gouvernance, équité et marchés mondiaux, sélection des Actes, Conférence ABCDE-Europe, Paris, 21 au 23 juin 1998 (1–2), numéro spécial, Paris, PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revue d’Économie du Dévelopement. (2001), Penser le développement au tournant du millénaire, Conférence ABCDE-Europe, Paris, 26 au 28 juin 2000, 9 (1–2), numéro spécial, Paris, PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revue de la régulation. (2012), Les capitalismes en Amérique Latine. De l’économique au politique, numéro 11, http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/9602

  • Revue de la régulation. (2013), The Topicality of Ostrom’s Approach: the Commons, Property Rights and Methodological Institutionalism, numero 14, http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/10287

  • Revue de la régulation. (2017), Lectures institutionnalistes de la Chine, n° 21, 1er semestre / Spring, http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/12228

  • Rodrik, D. (2006). Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank’s. Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. Journal of Economic Literature, XLIV(December), 973–987.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. and A. Singh (2017), Mexico’s productivity puzzle: What the state economies can tell us, MOODY’s Analytics. https://www.economy.com/home/products/samples/2017-06-15-mexicos-productivity-puzzle.pdf

  • Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5 pt. 2), S71–S102.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ros, J. (2015). ¿Cómo salir de la trampa del lento crecimiento y alta desigualdad?, El Colegio de México-UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (2000). Corruption bureaucratique et responsabilité politique. Revue d’économie du développement 8(1–2), numéro spécial, 145–150.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg, R. (2003). The failure and collapse of nation-states, breakdown, prevention and repair. In R. I. Rotberg (Ed.), When States Fail (p. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, J. (1989). Les fluctuations économiques en URSS, 1941–1985. Paris: Éditions de l’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, J. (1996), Le chaos russe, Coll. « Cahiers Libres », série « Essais », Paris, La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1980). Nobel lecture: The economics of being poor. Journal of Political Economy, 88(4), 639–651.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1964). Transforming Traditional Agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard Economic Studies, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1988). The concept of development. In H. dans Chenery & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. I, pp. 10–26). Genève: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1997). Development thinking at the beginning of the XXI century. In L. dans Emmerij (Ed.), Economic and social development into the XXI century (pp. 531–551). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank-John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafaeddin, M. (2016). Competitiveness and development. In E. S. Reinert, J. Gosh, & R. Kattel (Eds.), Handbook of alternative theories of economic development (pp. 570–593). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Socio Economic Review. (2005). Dialogue on ‘Institutional complementarity and political economy’. avec Amable Bruno, Boyer Robert, Crouch Colin, Halland Peter, Jackson Gregory & Wolfgang Streeck, Vol. 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94, & in Sen A. (Ed.). (1970). Growth economics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, pp. 161–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–320.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., & Greenwald, B. C. (2014). Creating a learning society. A New approach to growth, development, and social progress. New York: Columbia University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economy. Oxford: Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L. (2017, May 25). Secular stagnation truer today. Wall Street Journal. https://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2017/05/25/secular-stagnation-even-truer-today-larry-summers-says/

  • Théret, B. (1999). Vers un socialisme civil ? L’épreuve de la contrainte démocratique de différenciation de la société. dans Chavance B., Magnin E., Motamed-Nejad R., Sapir J. (Dir.), Capitalisme et socialisme en perspective (pp. 43–78). Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurbon, E., & Weiss, L. (2016). The developmental state in the late twenties century. In E. S. Reinert, J. Gosh, & R. Kattel (Eds.), Handbook of alternative theories of economic development (pp. 637–650). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2014). human development report 2014: Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. New York: UN Publication.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1978). Le système du monde du XVe siècle à nos jours. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, H., Zhu, T., Sturgeon, T., Han, M., Tsai, T., & Okita, T. (2010, December). Compressed development. Studies in Comparative international Development, 45(4), 439–467.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (1997). The Washington consensus revisited. In L. dans Emmerij (Ed.), Economic and social Development into the XXI Century (pp. 41–61). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank-John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, C. J.-R. (1990). Markets or governments, choosing between imperfect and alternatives. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1996). From Plan to Market. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1997). State and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

This appendix provides another synthesis of the chapter according to a different logic. At least seven stylized facts or issues cross the contemporary literature on development. Table 6.3 briefly gives the interpretations derived from the researches inspired by Régulation theory.

Table 6.3 – Some stylized facts that development theories should explain and the responses by Régulation theory

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boyer, R. (2019). The Process of Development: The Contribution of Régulation Theory. In: Nissanke, M., Ocampo, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13999-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14000-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)