Building Structural Health Monitoring Under Earthquake and Blasting Loading: The Chilean Experience
- 482 Downloads
Near real-time structural health monitoring (SHM) has been used in Chile since mid-2009. Chile is located in one of the most active seismic zones in the world so initially SHM was driven mainly by research demands to evaluate the earthquake response of structures. In addition, one of the main industries of Chile is mining, which has operational characteristics that include strong vibrations generated by blasting and heavy machinery operations. This article presents research and professional experiences on building monitoring under environmental, earthquake and blasting vibration conditions. A low-cost monitoring system is used to monitor most of the structures. To identify modal characteristics, different techniques are used such as Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI), Multivariable Output Error State Space (MOESP), and symbolic data analysis. Currently, more than 20 structures are being monitored by the procedures described in this article. A typical system consists of sensors, a local and a remote processing system, a robust data server and several communications media. The system provides information such as maximum response values, instrumental intensity, acceleration, velocity, displacement and modal parameters and, in parallel with numerical models, expected demands on structural member. All of this information is processed in near-real-time to obtain an indication of system changes that could be related with the damage.
KeywordsSystem identification Shm Modal tracking Monitoring Blasting Earthquakes Low-cost sensors Seismic isolation
We want to thank to CORFO Chile for their economic support and the owners of the buildings who allowed us to install our sensors and to measure the response of the buildings with our system.
- 1.Aguilar R, Apostoliti C, Boroschek R, Cardoni A, Cares D, Cimellaro G, Galdo D (2017 Dec 5–8) Monitoring human emotions during earthquakes. In: The 8 international conference on structural health monitoring of intelligent infrastructureGoogle Scholar
- 3.Boroschek RL (2013) Structural health monitoring performance during the 2010 gigantic Chile earthquake. Earthq Health Monit Civ Struct, 197–216Google Scholar
- 6.Boroschek R, Tamayo F, Aguilar R (2014 July 8–11) Evaluation of the environmental effects on a medium rise building. In: EWSHM-7th European workshop on structural health monitoringGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bray J, Rollins K, Hutchinson T, Verdugo R, Ledezma C, Mylonakis G, Olson S (2012) Effects of ground failure on buildings, ports, and industrial facilities. Earthq Spectra, S97–S118Google Scholar
- 10.Carreño R, Boroschek R (2011) Modal parameter variations due to earthquakes of different intensities. Civ Eng Top 4:321–333Google Scholar
- 11.Catbas N, Kijewski-Correa T, Aktan E (2013) Structural identification of constructed systems: approaches, methods, and technologies for effective practice of St-Id. American Society of Civil EngineersGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kaya Y, Safak E (2013) Real-time structural health monitoring and damage detection. Top Dyn Civ Struct 4:11–19Google Scholar
- 18.Muria-Vila D, Camargo J, Aldama B, Rodriguez G, Aguilar L, Ayala M (2013 Dec 9–11) Structural health monitoring of an instrumented building in Mexico with accelerometers and GPS sensors. In: The 6th international conference on structural health monitoring of intelligent infrastructureGoogle Scholar
- 22.Rahmani T, Hao Y, Todorovska M, Boroschek R (2017 Jan 9–13) Structural health monitoring of torre central by the wave method. In: 16th world conference on earthquake engineeringGoogle Scholar