Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer-Aided Design of Subject-Specific Dental Instruments for Preoperative Virtual Planning in Orthognathic Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biomanufacturing

Abstract

Maxillofacial deformities and undesirable position of the mandible cause facial asymmetry and malocclusions. The techniques and equipment used for the maxillofacial surgeries have changed over the years. In this chapter, traditional preoperative preparations and surgical planning process in the orthognathic surgery have been summarized. In addition, we reviewed various software and workflows used for the preoperative planning and design of the miniplates. We also presented a systematic protocol for the subject-specific miniplate design as a case study. In this case, design steps, which are required to be taken for obtaining the virtual model of the patient head composed of the skull, mandible, and teeth were elucidated. Simulation of the Le Fort I osteotomy, which is considered as a safe and functional procedure to correct maxillary deformities, benefiting from a computer-aided design software to plan the actual surgery process was also carried out. It is expected that the presented virtual planning process would improve the accuracy of orthognathic surgery and patient satisfaction, and reduce the operation time and cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot J (2009) Oral and maxillofacial pathology, 3rd edn. WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ruhl CM, Bellian KT, Van Meter BH, Hoard MA, Pham CD, Edlich RF (1994) Diagnosis, complications, and treatment of dentoskeletal malocclusion. Am J Emerg Med 12(1):98–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang CS, Hsu SS, Chen YR (2014) Systematic review of the surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery. Biomed J 37(4):184–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kraeima J, Jansma J, Schepers RH (2016) Splintless surgery: does patient-specific CAD-CAM osteosynthesis improve accuracy of Le Fort I osteotomy? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:1085–1089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Drommer RB (1986) The history of the “Le Fort I osteotomy”. J Maxillofac Surg 14:119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim SG, Park SS (2007) Incidence of complications and problems related to orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:2438–2444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammoudeh JA, Howell LK, Boutros S, Scott MA, Urata MM (2015) Current status of surgical planning for orthognathic surgery: traditional methods versus 3D surgical planning. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3(2):e307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hausamen JE (2001) The scientific development of maxillofacial surgery in the 20th century and an outlook into the future. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29:2–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zinser MJ, Mischkowski RA, Dreiseidler T et al (2013) Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: waferless maxillary positioning, versatility, and accuracy of an image-guided visualisation display. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:827–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vale F, Scherzberg J, Cavaleiro J, Sanz D, Caramelo F, Malo L, Marcelino JP (2016) 3D virtual planning in orthognathic surgery and CAD/CAM surgical splints generation in one patient with craniofacial microsomia: a case report. Dental Press J Orthod 21:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aboul-Hosn Centenero S, Hernández-Alfaro F (2012) 3D planning in orthognathic surgery: CAD/CAM surgical splints and prediction of the soft and hard tissues results—our experience in 16 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40:162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nilsson J, Richards RG, Thor A, Kamer L (2016) Virtual bite registration using intraoral digital scanning, CT and CBCT: in vitro evaluation of a new method and its implication for orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 44:1194–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Swennen GR, Mollemans W, Schutyser F (2009) Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67(10):2080–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C, Hagg U, Wong RW, Bendeus M, Yeung S (2010) Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 32:589–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW (2006) Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:794–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hatamleh MM, Bhamrah G, Ryba F, Mack G, Huppa C (2016) Simultaneous computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture bimaxillary orthognathic surgery and mandibular reconstruction using selective-laser sintered titanium implant. J Craniofac Surg 27:1810–1814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCormick SU, Drew SJ (2011) Virtual model surgery for efficient planning and surgical performance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:638–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stokbro K, Aagaard E, Torkov P, Bell RB, Thygesen T (2014) Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:957–965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cansiz E, Arslan YZ, Turan F, Atalay B (2014) Computer-assisted design of patient-specific sagittal split osteotomy guide and soft tissue retractor. J Med Biol Eng 34:363–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cansiz E, Turan F, Arslan YZ (2016) Computer-aided design and manufacturing of a novel maxillofacial surgery instrument: application in the sagittal split osteotomy. J Med Devices 10:44505-1–44505-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zinser MJ, Mischkowski RA, Sailer HF, Zöller JE (2012) Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: feasibility study using multiple CAD/CAM surgical splints. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 113:673–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hernandez-Alfaro F, Guijarro-Martinez R (2013) New protocol for three-dimensional surgical planning and CAD/CAM splint generation in orthognathic surgery: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:1547–1556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi JY, Song KG, Baek SH (2009) Virtual model surgery and wafer fabrication for orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:1306–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cansiz E, Dogru SC, Arslan YZ (2015) Comparative evaluation of the mechanical properties of resorbable and titanium miniplates used for fixation of mandibular condyle fractures. J Mech Med Biol 15:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dogru SC, Cansiz E, Arslan YZ (2018) A review of finite element applications in oral and maxillofacial biomechanics. J Mech Med Biol 18:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mišic D, Manic M, Vitkovic N, Korunovic N (2015) Toward an integrated information system for the design, manufacturing and application of customized implants. Facta Univ, Ser: Mech Eng 13(3):307–323

    Google Scholar 

  27. Manic M, Stamenkovic Z, Mitkovic M, Stojkovic M, Shephard DE (2015) Design of 3D model of customized anatomically adjusted implants. Facta Univ, Ser: Mech Eng 13(3):269–282

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ristic M, Manic M, Misic D, Kosanovic M, Mitkovic M (2017) Implants material selection using expert system. Facta Univ, Ser Mech Eng 15:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fernandes CR, Fernandes BL (2015) Evidence of the semi-solid formation in the medical grade TI6AL4V alloy using induction heating. Facta Univ, Ser: Mech Eng 13(3):229–239

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S et al (2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Neumann A (2009) Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction. Laryngorhinootologie 88(Suppl. 1):S48–S63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hatamleh MM, Turner C, Bhamrah G, Mack G, Osher J (2016) Improved virtual planning for bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 27:568–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Swennen GR, Mommaerts MY, Abeloos J, De Clercq C, Lamoral P, Neyt N (2009) A cone-beam CT based technique to augment the 3D virtual skull model with a detailed dental surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:48–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Agrawal JM, Agrawal MS, Nanjannavar LG, Parushetti AD (2013) CBCT in orthodontics: the wave of future. J Contemp Dent Pract 14:153–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cevidanes LH, Tucker S, Styner M (2010) Three-dimensional surgical simulation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Philippe B (2013) Custom-made prefabricated titanium miniplates in Lefort I osteotomies: principles, procedure and clinical insights. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:1001–1006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lin HH, Lonic D, Lo LJ (2018) 3D printing in orthognathic surgery—a literature review. J Formos Med Assoc 117(7):547–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Avcilar, 34320, Istanbul, Turkey

    Faruk Ortes & Yunus Ziya Arslan

  2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Capa, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey

    Erol Cansiz

Authors
  1. Faruk Ortes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erol Cansiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yunus Ziya Arslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunus Ziya Arslan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, Punjab, India

    Chander Prakash

  2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, Punjab, India

    Sunpreet Singh

  3. Department of Production Engineering, Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

    Rupinder Singh

  4. Centre for Nanofibers and Nanotechnology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Seeram Ramakrishna

  5. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, Chandigarh, India

    B. S. Pabla

  6. Center for Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

    Sanjeev Puri

  7. School of Engineering, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA, Australia

    M. S. Uddin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ortes, F., Cansiz, E., Arslan, Y.Z. (2019). Computer-Aided Design of Subject-Specific Dental Instruments for Preoperative Virtual Planning in Orthognathic Surgery. In: Prakash, C., et al. Biomanufacturing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13951-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation