Abstract
This introductory chapter sets up the roots and rationale of the volume while outlining its logical structure, contents and goals. It is about welfare, not of the captive laboratory or farm mammals and birds that we usually consider but about invertebrates, the other 99% of animal species. Invertebrates have been previously relegated to the category ‘things’ with no worry about what we do to them, but new research suggests that their behavioural and neurophysiological complexity was underestimated. Some invertebrates such as cephalopods, crustaceans and insects may feel pain and suffering and may have consciousness and awareness as well. Also, good welfare is going to mean different things to spiders, bees and coral animals. So we aim at taking animal welfare in a very different direction. We start by discussing why we need this book and what the value of non-vertebrate animals might be. The different chapters will focus on specific animal groups, tackling questions that are most appropriate to each one. What is pain in crustaceans, and how might we prevent it? How do we ensure that octopuses are not bored? What do bees need to thrive, pollinate our plants and give us honey? Since invertebrates have distinct personalities and some social animals have group personalities, how do we consider this? And, as in the European Union’s application of welfare consideration to cephalopods, how do the practical regulatory issues play out? This volume provides a first compilation of essays across invertebrate taxa illustrating how and why their welfare should be accomplished and instituted.
Keywords
- Invertebrates
- Animal welfare
- Pain
- Nociception
- Sentience
- Directive/2010/63/EU
- Animal personality
- Ethics
- Cognition
- Captivity
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
References
Aquatic Invertebrate Taxonomic Advisory Group (AITAG) (2014) Giant Pacific octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) care manual. American Zoological Association, Silver Springs
Birch J (2017) Animal sentience and the precautionary principle. Anim Sentience 16
Carere C, Woods J, Mather JA (2011) Species differences in captivity: where are the invertebrates? Trends Ecol Evol 26:211
Diggles BK (2019) Review of some scientific issues related to crustacean welfare. ICES J Mar Sci 76:66–81
Elwood RW (2016) Stress was never said to be pain: response to Stevens et al. (2016). Biol Lett 12:20160126
Horvath K, Angeletti D, Nascetti G, Carere C (2013) Invertebrate welfare: an overlooked issue. Ann Ist Super Sanità 49:9–17
Mather JA, Anderson RC (2007) Ethics and invertebrates: a cephalopod perspective. Dis Aquat Org 75:119–129
Mather JA, Kuba MJ (2013) The cephalopod specialties: complex nervous system, learning, and cognition. Can J Zool 91:431–449
Nagel T (1974) What is it like to be a bat? Philos Rev 83:435–450
Reber AS (2016) Caterpillars, consciousness and the origins of mind. Anim Sentience 11. https://animalstudiesrepository.org/animsent/vol2/iss16/1/
Zurlo J, Rudacille D, Goldberg AM (1996) The three Rs: the way forward. Environ Health Perspect 104:878–880
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carere, C., Mather, J.A. (2019). Why Invertebrate Welfare?. In: Carere, C., Mather, J. (eds) The Welfare of Invertebrate Animals. Animal Welfare, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13947-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13947-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13946-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13947-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)