Advertisement

Conservation pp 155-166 | Cite as

Ecodemocracy and Political Representation for Non-human Nature

  • Joe GrayEmail author
  • Patrick Curry
Chapter

Abstract

As we witness the sixth mass extinction unfold, it is hard not to feel exasperated by the lack of a say in human democracy for all the species and ecosystems that are suffering, if not being destroyed outright, at the hands of humans (see Washington in A sense of wonder towards nature: healing the world through belonging. Routledge, London, 2018). We are making decisions that have dramatic impacts on their fates without stopping to think what they might want. But this does not need to be the case. This paper is intended to contribute to the creation of political processes that recognize the intrinsic value of non-human nature (a value that is independent of any benefits for humans). We present, first, a review of the background—exploring where ecodemocracy fits into broader political and ethical theory—and then turn to consider how representation for non-human nature might be practically implemented in political processes. We are considering a political scale ranging from local groups all the way up to international alliances of governments—ecodemocracy can be put into practice at any of these.

References

  1. Anderson, K. (1995). Our natural selves. In Times Literary Supplement (pp. 10–11). September 8, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. Barry, J. (2012). The politics of actually existing unsustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry, J. (2016). Citizenship and (un)sustainability: A green republican perspective. In S. M. Gardiner & A. Thompson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of environmental ethics (pp. 333–343). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baxter, B. (2005). A theory of ecological justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, D. R. (2006). Political liberalism and ecological justice. Analyse & Kritik, 28, 206–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, M. (2003). Thomas Berry and an earth jurisprudence: An exploratory essay. The Trumpeter, 19, 69–96.Google Scholar
  7. Burnheim, J. (1995). Power-trading and the environment. Environmental Politics, 4, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cannavò, P. (2018). Ecological limits as promoting republican non-domination. In Conference Paper Delivered at the Workshop, “Green Politics and Civic Republicanism: Green Republicanism as a Response to the Environmental and Political Crises of the 21st Century”, ECPR Joint Sessions. Nicosia, Cyprus, April 10–14, 2018.Google Scholar
  9. Crist, E., Mora, C., & Engelman, R. (2017). The interaction of human population, food production, and biodiversity protection. Science, 356, 260–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cullinan, C. (2003). Wild law: A manifesto for earth justice. Totnes, Devon: Green Books.Google Scholar
  11. Curry, P. (2000). Redefining community: Towards an ecological republicanism. In: Biodiversity and conservation (Vol. 9, pp. 1059–1071). Available at http://www.patrickcurry.co.uk/papers/TowardsEcolpublicanism.pdf. Accessed August 2018.
  12. Curry, P. (2017). Ecological ethics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Dobson, A. (1996). Representative democracy and the environment. In W. M. Lafferty & J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Democracy and the environment (pp. 124–139). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  14. Dobson, A. (2003). Citizenship and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobson, A. (2010). Democracy and nature: Speaking and listening. Political Studies, 58, 757–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach. New York, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  17. Eckersley, R. (2004). The green state. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fremaux, A. (2018). Towards a critical towards a critical theory of the anthropocene and a life-affirming politics a post-anthropocentric, post-growth, post-(neo)liberal green republican analysis. Ph.D. thesis for Queen’s University Belfast. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anne_Fremaux. Accessed August 2018.
  19. Gray, M. (2013). Geodiversity: Valuing and conserving abiotic nature (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Gray, J., & Curry, P. (2016). Ecodemocracy: Helping wildlife’s right to survive. ECOS, 37, 18–27.Google Scholar
  21. Hester, R. T. (2010). Design for ecological democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Honohan, I. (2002). Civic republicanism. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Latour, B. (2004). The politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lidskog, R., & Elander, I. (2009). Addressing climate change democratically: Multi-level governance, transnational networks and governmental structures. Sustainable Development, 18, 32–41.Google Scholar
  25. Lundberg, J. (1992). America needs restructuring. Population and Environment, 13, 225–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lundmark, C. (1998). Eco-democracy: A green challenge to democratic theory and practice (thesis). Umeå: Umeå University.Google Scholar
  27. Macy, J. (1983). Despair and personal power in the nuclear age. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Macy, J., & Brown, M. (2014). Coming back to life: The updated guide to the work that reconnects. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Mathews, F. (Ed.). (1996). Ecology and democracy. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  30. Melo-Escrihuela, C. (2015). Should ecological citizenship advocates praise the green state? Environmental Values, 24, 321–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mill, J. S. (2006) [1859]. On liberty and the subjection of women. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  32. Mills, M. (1996). Green democracy: The search for an ethical solution. In: B. Doherty & M. De Geus (Eds.), Democracy and green political thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. O’Neill, J. (2006). Who speaks for nature? In Y. Haila & C. Dyke (Eds.), How nature speaks: The dynamics of the human ecological condition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.Google Scholar
  34. Ott, K. (2012). Variants of de-growth and deliberative democracy: A Habermasian proposal. Futures, 44, 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Phillips, R. A., & Reichart, J. (2000). The environment as a stakeholder? A fairness-based approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Plumwood, V. (1996). Has democracy failed ecology? An ecofeminist perspective. In F. Mathews (Ed.), Ecology and democracy (pp. 134–168). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  38. Rainforest Information Centre. (no date). The council of all beings workshop manual. Available at http://www.rainforestinfo.org.au/deep-eco/cabcont.htm. Accessed August 2018.
  39. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Robertson, D. (1993). Dictionary of politics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  41. Roy, E. A. (2017). New Zealand river granted same legal rights as human being. The Guardian, March 16, 2017. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/16/new-zealand-river-granted-same-legal-rights-as-human-being. Accessed August 2018.
  42. Sarkki, S., & Heikkinen, H. I. (2014). Why do environmentalists not consider compromises as legitimate? Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scruton, R. (1983). A dictionary of political thought. London: Pan Books.Google Scholar
  44. Seed, J., Macy, J., Fleming, P., & Naess, A. (1988). Thinking like a mountain: Towards a council of all beings. London: Heretic Books.Google Scholar
  45. Seegert, A. (2014). Pixels and pathos: Video games and empathy. Presented at: Interdisciplinary Symposium on Empathy, Contemplative Practice and Pedagogy, the Humanities, and the Sciences. University of Utah, USA.Google Scholar
  46. Washington, H. (2018). A sense of wonder towards nature: Healing the world through belonging. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Washington, H., Chapron, G., Kopnina, H., Curry, P., Gray, J., & Piccolo, J. (2018). Foregrounding ecojustice in conservation. Biological Conservation, 228, 367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weber, M. (2008) [1919]. Politics as vocation. In J. Dreisjmanis (Ed.), Max Weber’s complete writings on academic and political vocations. New York, NY: Algora Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ScholarSt AlbansUK
  2. 2.Independent ScholarLondonUK

Personalised recommendations