Graphite-Polydimethylsiloxane Sensor

  • Anindya NagEmail author
  • Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
  • Jurgen Kosel
Part of the Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation book series (SSMI, volume 33)


This chapter represents the fabrication and implementation of a novel sensor prototype developed from 3D printed mold-based technique. 3D printing was done to develop molds of specific dimensions where the casting of Graphite and PDMS was done to develop the electrodes and substrates of the sensor patches respectively. The developed sensors were used for monitoring strain-induced physiological movements by attaching them to different joints of the body. They were also employed for low-force sensing where identical objects with different weights were positioned in the sensing area of the patches to determine their responses.


  1. Amjadi M, Pichitpajongkit A, Lee S, Ryu S, Park I (2014) Highly stretchable and sensitive strain sensor based on silver nanowire–elastomer nanocomposite. ACS Nano 8:5154–5163Google Scholar
  2. Amjadi M, Yoon YJ, Park I (2015) Ultra-stretchable and skin-mountable strain sensors using carbon nanotubes–Ecoflex nanocomposites. Nanotechnology 26:375501Google Scholar
  3. Bae S-H, Lee Y, Sharma BK, Lee H-J, Kim J-H, Ahn J-H (2013) Graphene-based transparent strain sensor. Carbon 51:236–242Google Scholar
  4. Bhalla S, Bajaj S (2008) Bone characterization using piezotransducers as biomedical sensors. Strain 44:475–478Google Scholar
  5. Bingger P, Zens M, Woias P (2012) Highly flexible capacitive strain gauge for continuous long-term blood pressure monitoring. Biomed Microdevice 14:573–581Google Scholar
  6. Cai L et al. (2013) Super-stretchable, transparent carbon nanotube-based capacitive strain sensors for human motion detection. Sci Rep 3:3048Google Scholar
  7. Chang-bin T, Dao-xin L, Zhan W, Yang G (2011) Electro-spark alloying using graphite electrode on titanium alloy surface for biomedical applications. Appl Surf Sci 257:6364–6371Google Scholar
  8. Chen A, Chatterjee S (2013) Nanomaterials based electrochemical sensors for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev 42:5425–5438Google Scholar
  9. Cheng S, Wu Z (2011) A microfluidic, reversibly stretchable, large-area wireless strain sensor. Adv Func Mater 21:2282–2290Google Scholar
  10. Dharap P, Li Z, Nagarajaiah S, Barrera E (2004) Nanotube film based on single-wall carbon nanotubes for strain sensing. Nanotechnology 15:379Google Scholar
  11. Ge J et al (2016) A stretchable electronic fabric artificial skin with pressure-, lateral strain-, and flexion-sensitive properties. Adv Mater 28:722–728Google Scholar
  12. Hu B, Ding Y, Chen W, Kulkarni D, Shen Y, Tsukruk VV, Wang ZL (2010) External-strain induced insulating phase transition in VO2 nanobeam and its application as flexible strain sensor. Adv Mater 22:5134–5139Google Scholar
  13. Jeong YR, Park H, Jin SW, Hong SY, Lee SS, Ha JS (2015) Highly stretchable and sensitive strain sensors using fragmentized graphene foam. Adv Func Mater 25:4228–4236Google Scholar
  14. Jing Z, Guang-Yu Z, Dong-Xia S (2013) Review of graphene-based strain sensors. Chin Phys B 22:057701Google Scholar
  15. Kang D et al (2014) Ultrasensitive mechanical crack-based sensor inspired by the spider sensory system. Nature 516:222–226Google Scholar
  16. Kanoun O et al (2014) Flexible carbon nanotube films for high performance strain sensors. Sensors 14:10042–10071Google Scholar
  17. Kim H-K, Lee S, Yun K-S (2011a) Capacitive tactile sensor array for touch screen application. Sens Actuators A 165:2–7Google Scholar
  18. Kim SH, Moon J-H, Kim JH, Jeong SM, Lee S-H (2011b) Flexible, stretchable and implantable PDMS encapsulated cable for implantable medical device. Biomed Eng Lett 1:199–203Google Scholar
  19. Lee H-K, Chung J, Chang S-I, Yoon E (2011) Real-time measurement of the three-axis contact force distribution using a flexible capacitive polymer tactile sensor. J Micromech Microeng 21:035010Google Scholar
  20. Malekie S, Ziaie F (2015) Study on a novel dosimeter based on polyethylene–carbon nanotube composite. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors Assoc Equip 791:1–5Google Scholar
  21. Mattmann C, Clemens F, Tröster G (2008) Sensor for measuring strain in textile. Sensors 8:3719–3732Google Scholar
  22. Nag A, Feng S, Mukhopadhyay S, Kosel J, Inglis D (2018) 3D printed mould-based graphite/PDMS sensor for low-force applications. Sens Actuators A Phys 280:525–534Google Scholar
  23. Nag A, Mukhopadhyay S, Kosel J (2016a) Transparent biocompatible sensor patches for touch sensitive prosthetic limbs. In: 2016 10th international conference on sensing technology (ICST). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  24. Nag A, Mukhopadhyay SC, Kosel J (2016b) Flexible carbon nanotube nanocomposite sensor for multiple physiological parameter monitoring. Sens Actuators A 251:148–155Google Scholar
  25. Nour M, Berean K, Griffin MJ, Matthews GI, Bhaskaran M, Sriram S, Kalantar-Zadeh K (2012) Nanocomposite carbon-PDMS membranes for gas separation. Sens Actuators B Chem 161:982–988Google Scholar
  26. Park S et al (2014) Stretchable energy-harvesting tactile electronic skin capable of differentiating multiple mechanical stimuli modes. Adv Mater 26:7324–7332Google Scholar
  27. Qin Y et al (2015) Lightweight, superelastic, and mechanically flexible graphene/polyimide nanocomposite foam for strain sensor application. ACS Nano 9:8933–8941Google Scholar
  28. Rakibet OO, Rumens CV, Batchelor JC, Holder SJ (2014) Epidermal passive RFID strain sensor for assisted technologies. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 13:814–817Google Scholar
  29. Ryu S, Lee P, Chou JB, Xu R, Zhao R, Hart AJ, Kim S-G (2015) Extremely elastic wearable carbon nanotube fiber strain sensor for monitoring of human motion. ACS nano 9:5929–5936Google Scholar
  30. Sebastian J, Schehl N, Bouchard M, Boehle M, Li L, Lagounov A, Lafdi K (2014) Health monitoring of structural composites with embedded carbon nanotube coated glass fiber sensors. Carbon 66:191–200Google Scholar
  31. Shih W-P, Tsao L-C, Lee C-W, Cheng M-Y, Chang C, Yang Y-J, Fan K-C (2010) Flexible temperature sensor array based on a graphite-polydimethylsiloxane composite Sensors 10:3597–3610Google Scholar
  32. Stassi S, Cauda V, Canavese G, Pirri CF (2014) Flexible tactile sensing based on piezoresistive composites: a review Sensors 14:5296–5332Google Scholar
  33. Tadakaluru S, Thongsuwan W, Singjai P (2014) Stretchable and flexible high-strain sensors made using carbon nanotubes and graphite films on natural rubber. Sensors 14:868–876Google Scholar
  34. Tiwana MI, Shashank A, Redmond SJ, Lovell NH (2011) Characterization of a capacitive tactile shear sensor for application in robotic and upper limb prostheses. Sens Actuators A 165:164–172Google Scholar
  35. Tymrak B, Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58:242–246Google Scholar
  36. Viry L, Levi A, Totaro M, Mondini A, Mattoli V, Mazzolai B, Beccai L (2014) Flexible three-axial force sensor for soft and highly sensitive artificial touch. Adv Mater 26:2659–2664Google Scholar
  37. Wang Y et al (2014) Wearable and highly sensitive graphene strain sensors for human motion monitoring. Adv Func Mater 24:4666–4670Google Scholar
  38. Wang Y, Yang R, Shi Z, Zhang L, Shi D, Wang E, Zhang G (2011) Super-elastic graphene ripples for flexible strain sensors. ACS Nano 5:3645–3650Google Scholar
  39. Weigel M, Lu T, Bailly G, Oulasvirta A, Majidi C, Steimle J (2015) Iskin: flexible, stretchable and visually customizable on-body touch sensors for mobile computing. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 2991–3000Google Scholar
  40. Wong RDP, Posner JD, Santos VJ (2012) Flexible microfluidic normal force sensor skin for tactile feedback. Sens Actuators A 179:62–69Google Scholar
  41. Xiao X et al (2011) High-strain sensors based on ZnO nanowire/polystyrene hybridized flexible films. Adv Mater 23:5440–5444Google Scholar
  42. Yamada T, Hayamizu Y, Yamamoto Y, Yomogida Y, Izadi-Najafabadi A, Futaba DN, Hata K (2011) A stretchable carbon nanotube strain sensor for human-motion detection. Nat Nanotechnol 6:296–301Google Scholar
  43. Yang PK et al (2015) a flexible, stretchable and shape-adaptive approach for versatile energy conversion and self-powered biomedical monitoring. Adv Mater 27:3817–3824Google Scholar
  44. Yao S, Zhu Y (2014) Wearable multifunctional sensors using printed stretchable conductors made of silver nanowires. Nanoscale 6:2345–2352Google Scholar
  45. Yeo WH et al (2013) Multifunctional epidermal electronics printed directly onto the skin. Adv Mater 25:2773–2778Google Scholar
  46. Yin G, Hu N, Karube Y, Liu Y, Li Y, Fukunaga H (2011) A carbon nanotube/polymer strain sensor with linear and anti-symmetric piezoresistivity. J Compos Mater 45:1315–1323Google Scholar
  47. Zhao H, Zhang Y, Bradford PD, Zhou Q, Jia Q, Yuan F-G, Zhu Y (2010) Carbon nanotube yarn strain sensors. Nanotechnology 21:305502Google Scholar
  48. Zia AI, Mohd Syaifudin A, Mukhopadhyay S, Al-Bahadly I, Yu P, Gooneratne C, Kosel J (2011) Development of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy based sensing system for DEHP detection. In: 2011 fifth international conference on sensing technology (ICST). IEEE, pp 666–674Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anindya Nag
    • 1
    Email author
  • Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
    • 2
  • Jurgen Kosel
    • 3
  1. 1.School of EngineeringMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of EngineeringMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.King Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyThuwalSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations