Advertisement

Carbon Nanotubes-Polydimethylsiloxane Sensor

  • Anindya NagEmail author
  • Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
  • Jurgen Kosel
Chapter
Part of the Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation book series (SSMI, volume 33)

Abstract

This chapter depicts the design, fabrication, and employment of the first novel sensor prototype formed from Carboxylic acid functionalized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNTs) and Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Casting and laser cutting techniques were used to develop the patches where the electrodes were curved out off a nanocomposite layer that was formed by mixing MWCNTs and PDMS. The sensors were then employed for monitoring limb movements and respiration by attaching them to the joints of the limbs and lower part of the diaphragm. They were also deployed for low-pressure tactile sensing purposes.

References

  1. Altun K, Barshan B (2010) Human activity recognition using inertial/magnetic sensor units. In: Human behavior understanding. Springer, Berlin, pp 38–51Google Scholar
  2. Aminian K, Najafi B (2004) Capturing human motion using body-fixed sensors: outdoor measurement and clinical applications. Comput Anim Virt Worlds 15:79–94Google Scholar
  3. Arena A, Donato N, Saitta G, Bonavita A, Rizzo G, Neri G (2010) Flexible ethanol sensors on glossy paper substrates operating at room temperature. Sens Actuators B Chemi 145:488–494Google Scholar
  4. Armani D, Liu C, Aluru N (1999) Re-configurable fluid circuits by PDMS elastomer micromachining. In: Twelfth IEEE international conference onmicro electro mechanical systems (MEMS’99). IEEE, pp 222–227Google Scholar
  5. Ashruf C (2002) Thin flexible pressure sensors. Sens Rev 22:322–327Google Scholar
  6. Bell J, Shen X, Sazonov E (2015) Early detection of sit-to-stand transitions in a lower limb orthosis. In: 37th annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, pp 5028–5031Google Scholar
  7. Boland JJ (2010) Flexible electronics: within touch of artificial skin. Nat Mater 9:790–792Google Scholar
  8. Briand D, Molina-Lopez F, Quintero AV, Ataman C, Courbat J, de Rooij NF (2011) Why going towards plastic and flexible sensors? Proc Eng 25:8–15Google Scholar
  9. Bu N, Ueno N, Fukuda O (2007) Monitoring of respiration and heartbeat during sleep using a flexible piezoelectric film sensor and empirical mode decomposition. In: 2007 29th annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE, pp 1362–1366Google Scholar
  10. Cannata G, Maggiali M, Metta G, Sandini G (2008) An embedded artificial skin for humanoid robots. In: IEEE international conference on multisensor fusion and integration for intelligent systems (MFI 2008). IEEE, pp 434–438Google Scholar
  11. Carrozza MC, Dario P, Vecchi F, Roccella S, Zecca M, Sebastiani E (2003) The CyberHand: on the design of a cybernetic prosthetic hand intended to be interfaced to the peripheral nervous system. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2003). IEEE, pp 2642–2647Google Scholar
  12. Charton C, Schiller N, Fahland M, Holländer A, Wedel A, Noller K (2006) Development of high barrier films on flexible polymer substrates. Thin Solid Films 502:99–103Google Scholar
  13. Chiu Y-Y, Lin W-Y, Wang H-Y, Huang S-B, Wu M-H (2013) Development of a piezoelectric polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) polymer-based sensor patch for simultaneous heartbeat and respiration monitoring. Sens Actuators A Phys 189:328–334Google Scholar
  14. Crabtree VM, Ivanenko A, O’Brien LM, Gozal D (2003) Periodic limb movement disorder of sleep in children. J Sleep Res 12:73–81Google Scholar
  15. Dargahi J (2000) A piezoelectric tactile sensor with three sensing elements for robotic, endoscopic and prosthetic applications. Sens Actuators A Phys 80:23–30Google Scholar
  16. De Gans B-J, Duineveld PC, Schubert US (2004) Inkjet printing of polymers: state of the art and future developments. Adv Mater 16:203–213Google Scholar
  17. Erik Scheme P, Kevin Englehart P (2011) Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. J Rehabil Res Develop 48:643Google Scholar
  18. Fortino G, Giannantonio R, Gravina R, Kuryloski P, Jafari R (2013) Enabling effective programming and flexible management of efficient body sensor network applications. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 43:115–133Google Scholar
  19. Fougner A, Stavdahl Ø, Kyberd PJ, Losier YG, Parker PA (2012) Control of upper limb prostheses: terminology and proportional myoelectric control—a review. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 20:663–677Google Scholar
  20. Frankland S, Harik V, Odegard G, Brenner D, Gates T (2003) The stress–strain behavior of polymer–nanotube composites from molecular dynamics simulation Composites Science and Technology 63:1655–1661Google Scholar
  21. Fujii T (2002) PDMS-based microfluidic devices for biomedical applications. Microelectron Eng 61:907–914Google Scholar
  22. Gower MC (2000) Excimer laser microfabrication and micromachining. In: First international symposium on laser precision microfabrication (LPM2000). International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 124–131Google Scholar
  23. Hayes TL, Hagler S, Austin D, Kaye J, Pavel M (2009) Unobtrusive assessment of walking speed in the home using inexpensive PIR sensors. In: Annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2009). IEEE, pp 7248–7251Google Scholar
  24. Herzer N, Hoeppener S, Schubert US (2010) Fabrication of patterned silane based self-assembled monolayers by photolithography and surface reactions on silicon-oxide substrates. Chem Commun 46:5634–5652Google Scholar
  25. Jo B-H, Van Lerberghe LM, Motsegood KM, Beebe DJ (2000) Three-dimensional micro-channel fabrication in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer. J Microelectromech Syst 9:76–81Google Scholar
  26. Jung S, Ji T, Varadan VK (2006) Point-of-care temperature and respiration monitoring sensors for smart fabric applications. Smart Mater Struct 15:1872Google Scholar
  27. Kaniusas E et al (2006) Method for continuous nondisturbing monitoring of blood pressure by magnetoelastic skin curvature sensor and ECG. Sens J 6:819–828Google Scholar
  28. Kelly SDT, Suryadevara NK, Mukhopadhyay SC (2013) Towards the implementation of IoT for environmental condition monitoring in homes. Sens J 13:3846–3853Google Scholar
  29. Lam CXF, Mo X, Teoh S-H, Hutmacher D (2002) Scaffold development using 3D printing with a starch-based polymer. Mater Sci Eng C 20:49–56Google Scholar
  30. Lau CH et al (2008) The effect of functionalization on structure and electrical conductivity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Nanopart Res 10:77–88Google Scholar
  31. Leonard PA, Douglas JG, Grubb NR, Clifton D, Addison PS, Watson JN (2006) A fully automated algorithm for the determination of respiratory rate from the photoplethysmogram. J Clin Monit Comput 20:33–36Google Scholar
  32. Malhi K, Mukhopadhyay SC, Schnepper J, Haefke M, Ewald H (2012) A Zigbee-based wearable physiological parameters monitoring system. IEEE Sens J 12:423–430Google Scholar
  33. Mehnen L et al (2004) Magnetostrictive bilayer sensors—a survey. J Alloys Compounds 369:202–204Google Scholar
  34. Merritt CR, Nagle HT, Grant E (2009) Textile-based capacitive sensors for respiration monitoring. IEEE Sens J 9:71–78Google Scholar
  35. Muzumdar A (2004) Powered upper limb prostheses: control, implementation and clinical application. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  36. Najafi B, Aminian K, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Loew F, Büla CJ, Robert P (2003) Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50:711–723Google Scholar
  37. Nguyen KD, Chen I, Luo Z, Yeo SH, Duh HB-L (2011) A wearable sensing system for tracking and monitoring of functional arm movement. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics 16:213–220Google Scholar
  38. Nilsson L, Johansson A, Kalman S (2000) Monitoring of respiratory rate in postoperative care using a new photoplethysmographic technique. J Clin Monit Comput 16:309–315Google Scholar
  39. Odame K, Du D (2013) Towards a smart sensor interface for wearable cough monitoring, IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing. December 3–5, Austin, Texas, USA, pp 654–657Google Scholar
  40. Pfützner H et al (2006) Magnetostrictive bilayers for multi-functional sensor families. Sens Actuators A 129:154–158Google Scholar
  41. Reinvuo T, Hannula M, Sorvoja H, Alasaarela E, Myllylä R (2006) Measurement of respiratory rate with high-resolution accelerometer and EMFit pressure sensor. In: Sensors applications symposium. IEEE, pp 192–195Google Scholar
  42. Sazonov ES, Fulk G, Hill J, Schutz Y, Browning R (2011) Monitoring of posture allocations and activities by a shoe-based wearable sensor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58:983–990Google Scholar
  43. Snakenborg D, Klank H, Kutter JP (2004) Microstructure fabrication with a CO2 laser system. J Micromech Microeng 14:182Google Scholar
  44. Suryadevara NK, Mukhopadhyay SC (2012) Wireless sensor network based home monitoring system for wellness determination of elderly. Sens J 12:1965–1972Google Scholar
  45. Touch-Sensitive Prosthetic Limbs Take Step Forward in Monkey Study (2013). http://www.livescience.com/40405-touch-sensitive-prosthetic-limbs-monkey-study.html
  46. Trampuz A, Steckelberg JM, Osmon DR, Cockerill Iii FR, Hanssen AD, Patel R (2003) Advances in the laboratory diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Rev Med Microbiol 14:1–14Google Scholar
  47. Warkentin M, Freese HM, Karsten U, Schumann R (2007) New and fast method to quantify respiration rates of bacterial and plankton communities in freshwater ecosystems by using optical oxygen sensor spots. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:6722–6729Google Scholar
  48. Yang C-C, Hsu Y-L (2010) A review of accelerometry-based wearable motion detectors for physical activity monitoring. Sensors 10:7772–7788Google Scholar
  49. Zimmerli W (2006) Prosthetic-joint-associated infections. Best Practice Res Clin Rheumatol 20:1045–1063Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anindya Nag
    • 1
    Email author
  • Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
    • 2
  • Jurgen Kosel
    • 3
  1. 1.School of EngineeringMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of EngineeringMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.King Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyThuwalSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations