• Anindya NagEmail author
  • Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
  • Jurgen Kosel
Part of the Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation book series (SSMI, volume 33)


This chapter showcases the significance of sensors, explaining the ideology behind the usage of printed flexible sensors, their fabrication techniques and some of their applications.


  1. Alfadhel A, Khan MA, Cardoso S, Leitao D, Kosel J (2016) A magnetoresistive tactile sensor for harsh environment applications. Sensors 16:650Google Scholar
  2. Blanchet GB, Loo Y-L, Rogers J, Gao F, Fincher C (2003) Large area, high resolution, dry printing of conducting polymers for organic electronics. Appl Phys Lett 82:463–465Google Scholar
  3. Cai J et al (2009) Flexible thick-film electrochemical sensors: Impact of mechanical bending and stress on the electrochemical behavior. Sens Actuators B: Chem 137:379–385Google Scholar
  4. Chang W-Y, Fang T-H, Lin H-J, Shen Y-T, Lin Y-C (2009) A large area flexible array sensors using screen printing technology. J Disp Technol 5:178–183Google Scholar
  5. Choi KH, Khan S, Dang HW, Doh YH, Hong SJ (2010) Electrohydrodynamic spray deposition of ZnO nanoparticles. Jpn J Appl Phys 49:05EC08Google Scholar
  6. Crowley K et al (2008) Fabrication of an ammonia gas sensor using inkjet-printed polyaniline nanoparticles. Talanta 77:710–717Google Scholar
  7. Dahiya RS, Adami A, Collini C, Lorenzelli L (2012) Fabrication of single crystal silicon micro-/nanostructures and transferring them to flexible substrates. Microelectron Eng 98:502–507Google Scholar
  8. Dahiya RS, Gennaro S (2013) Bendable ultra-thin chips on flexible foils. IEEE Sens J 13:4030–4037Google Scholar
  9. Engel J, Chen J, Liu C (2003) Development of polyimide flexible tactile sensor skin. J Micromech Microeng 13:359Google Scholar
  10. Fortunato E, Correia N, Barquinha P, Pereira L, Gonçalves G, Martins R (2008) High-performance flexible hybrid field-effect transistors based on cellulose fiber paper. IEEE Electron Device Lett 29:988–990Google Scholar
  11. Gong S et al (2014) A wearable and highly sensitive pressure sensor with ultrathin gold nanowires. Nat Commun 5Google Scholar
  12. Jo B-H, Van Lerberghe LM, Motsegood KM, Beebe DJ (2000) Three-dimensional micro-channel fabrication in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer. J Microelectromech Syst 9:76–81Google Scholar
  13. Kamyshny A, Magdassi S (2014) Conductive nanomaterials for printed electronics. Small 10:3515–3535Google Scholar
  14. Karimov KS, Akhmedov M, Mateen A (2015) Novel pressure and displacement sensors based on carbon nanotubes. 中国物理 B: 英文版:560–563Google Scholar
  15. Khan S, Lorenzelli L, Dahiya RS (2015) Technologies for printing sensors and electronics over large flexible substrates: a review. IEEE Sens J 15:3164–3185Google Scholar
  16. Kim H-S, Dhage SR, Shim D-E, Hahn HT (2009) Intense pulsed light sintering of copper nanoink for printed electronics. Appl Phys A 97:791–798Google Scholar
  17. Lee Y, Choi J-R, Lee KJ, Stott NE, Kim D (2008) Large-scale synthesis of copper nanoparticles by chemically controlled reduction for applications of inkjet-printed electronics. Nanotechnology 19:415604Google Scholar
  18. Leenen MA, Arning V, Thiem H, Steiger J, Anselmann R (2009) Printable electronics: flexibility for the future. Phys Status Solidi A 206:588–597Google Scholar
  19. Li B et al (2007) Inkjet printed chemical sensor array based on polythiophene conductive polymers. Sens Actuators B: Chem 123:651–660Google Scholar
  20. Li Y, Wu Y, Ong BS (2005) Facile synthesis of silver nanoparticles useful for fabrication of high-conductivity elements for printed electronics. J Am Chem Soc 127:3266–3267Google Scholar
  21. Luechinger NA, Athanassiou EK, Stark WJ (2008) Graphene-stabilized copper nanoparticles as an air-stable substitute for silver and gold in low-cost ink-jet printable electronics. Nanotechnology 19:445201Google Scholar
  22. Mainwaring A, Culler D, Polastre J, Szewczyk R, Anderson J (2002) Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on wireless sensor networks and applications, ACM, September 28, Atlanta, USA, pp 88–97Google Scholar
  23. Mannsfeld SC et al (2010) Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers. Nat Mater 9:859–864Google Scholar
  24. Meixner H, Jones R, Wolfgang G, Hesse J, Zemel J (2008) Sensors, micro-and nanosensor technology: trends in sensor markets, vol 8. WileyGoogle Scholar
  25. Mukhopadhyay SC, Gooneratne CP (2007) A novel planar-type biosensor for noninvasive meat inspection. Sens J IEEE 7:1340–1346Google Scholar
  26. Muro H (2013) History and recent progress of MEMS physical sensors. In: Advances in science and technology, 2013. Trans Tech Publ, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  27. Muth JT, Vogt DM, Truby RL, Mengüç Y, Kolesky DB, Wood RJ, Lewis JA (2014) Embedded 3D printing of strain sensors within highly stretchable elastomers. Adv Mater 26:6307–6312Google Scholar
  28. Nag A, Mukhopadhyay SC (2014) Smart home: recognition of activities of elderly for 24/7; Coverage issues. In: Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on sensing technology, Liverpool, UK, pp 480–489Google Scholar
  29. Nag A, Mukhopadhyay SC, Kosel J (2016a) Flexible carbon nanotube nanocomposite sensor for multiple physiological parameter monitoring. Sens Actuators A: Phys 251:148–155Google Scholar
  30. Nag A, Zia AI, Li X, Mukhopadhyay SC, Kosel J (2016b) Novel sensing approach for LPG leakage detection—part II: effects of particle size, composition, and coating layer thickness. IEEE Sens J 16:1088–1094Google Scholar
  31. Nag A, Zia AI, Li X, Mukhopadhyay SC, Kosel J (2016c) Novel sensing approach for lpg leakage detection: part I—operating mechanism and preliminary results. IEEE Sens J 16:996–1003Google Scholar
  32. Nomura K, Ohta H, Ueda K, Kamiya T, Hirano M, Hosono H (2003) Thin-film transistor fabricated in single-crystalline transparent oxide semiconductor. Science 300:1269–1272Google Scholar
  33. Oberg PA, Togawa T, Spelman FA (2006) Sensors applications. In: Sensors in Medicine and Health Care, vol 3. WileyGoogle Scholar
  34. Otto C, Milenkovic A, Sanders C, Jovanov E (2006) System architecture of a wireless body area sensor network for ubiquitous health monitoring. J Mob Multimedia 1:307–326Google Scholar
  35. Patel S, Park H, Bonato P, Chan L, Rodgers M (2012) A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 9:1Google Scholar
  36. Pease RF, Chou SY (2008) Lithography and other patterning techniques for future electronics. Proc IEEE 96:248–270Google Scholar
  37. Rahman MSA, Mukhopadhyay SC, Yu P-L (2014) Novel sensors for food inspection: modelling, fabrication and experimentation. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  38. Rahman MSA, Mukhopadhyay SC, Yu P-L, Goicoechea J, Matias IR, Gooneratne CP, Kosel J (2013) Detection of bacterial endotoxin in food: new planar interdigital sensors based approach. J Food Eng 114:346–360Google Scholar
  39. Revzin A et al (2001) Fabrication of poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogel microstructures using photolithography. Langmuir 17:5440–5447Google Scholar
  40. Sawhney A, Agrawal A, Patra P, Calvert P (2006) Piezoresistive sensors on textiles by inkjet printing and electroless plating. MRS Online Proceedings Library Archive 920Google Scholar
  41. Schuettler M, Stiess S, King B, Suaning G (2005) Fabrication of implantable microelectrode arrays by laser cutting of silicone rubber and platinum foil. In: The work presented here was carried out at The University of Newcastle. Aust J Neural Eng 2:S121Google Scholar
  42. Secor EB, Lim S, Zhang H, Frisbie CD, Francis LF, Hersam MC (2014) Gravure printing of graphene for large-area flexible electronics. Adv Mater 26:4533–4538Google Scholar
  43. Segev-Bar M, Haick H (2013) Flexible sensors based on nanoparticles. ACS Nano 7:8366–8378Google Scholar
  44. Soloman S (2009) Sensors handbook. McGraw-Hill, IncGoogle Scholar
  45. Sriprachuabwong C, Karuwan C, Wisitsorrat A, Phokharatkul D, Lomas T, Sritongkham P, Tuantranont A (2012) Inkjet-printed graphene-PEDOT: PSS modified screen printed carbon electrode for biochemical sensing. J Mater Chem 22:5478–5485Google Scholar
  46. Subramanian V et al (2008) Printed electronics for low-cost electronic systems: Technology status and application development. In: 38th European Solid-state device research conference, 2008, ESSDERC 2008. IEEE, pp 17–24Google Scholar
  47. Suryadevara N, Mukhopadhyay S, Rayudu R, Huang Y (2012) Sensor data fusion to determine wellness of an elderly in intelligent home monitoring environment. In: Instrumentation and measurement technology conference (I2MTC), 2012 IEEE International. IEEE, pp 947–952Google Scholar
  48. Sze SM (1994) Semiconductor sensors, vol 55. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Szewczyk R, Osterweil E, Polastre J, Hamilton M, Mainwaring A, Estrin D (2004) Habitat monitoring with sensor networks. Commun ACM 47:34–40Google Scholar
  50. Tobjörk D, Österbacka R (2011) Paper electronics. Adv Mater 23:1935–1961Google Scholar
  51. Unno Y et al. (2011) Development of n-on-p silicon sensors for very high radiation environments. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 636:S24–S30Google Scholar
  52. Wang C-T, Huang K-Y, Lin DT, Liao W-C, Lin H-W, Hu Y-C (2010) A flexible proximity sensor fully fabricated by inkjet printing. Sensors 10:5054–5062Google Scholar
  53. Wang J (2001) Glucose biosensors: 40 years of advances and challenges. Electroanalysis 13:983Google Scholar
  54. Yao S, Zhu Y (2014) Wearable multifunctional sensors using printed stretchable conductors made of silver nanowires. Nanoscale 6:2345–2352Google Scholar
  55. Yin Z, Huang Y, Bu N, Wang X, Xiong Y (2010) Inkjet printing for flexible electronics: materials, processes and equipments. Chin Sci Bull 55:3383–3407Google Scholar
  56. Yunus MAM, Mukhopadhyay SC (2011) Development of planar electromagnetic sensors for measurement and monitoring of environmental parameters. Measur Sci Technol 22:025107. Scholar
  57. Zhang L, Li J, Zhang X, Jiang X, Zhang Z (2009) High performance ZnO-thin-film transistor with Ta2O5 dielectrics fabricated at room temperature. Appl Phys Lett 95:072112Google Scholar
  58. Zhou Y et al (2012) A universal method to produce low–work function electrodes for organic electronics. Science 336:327–332Google Scholar
  59. Zia AI, Mohd Syaifudin A, Mukhopadhyay S, Al-Bahadly I, Yu P, Gooneratne C, Kosel J (2011) Development of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy based sensing system for DEHP detection. In: 2011 fifth international conference on sensing technology (ICST), 2011. IEEE, pp 666–674Google Scholar
  60. Zia AI, Mukhopadhyay S, Al-Bahadly I, Yu P, Gooneratne CP, Kosel J (2014) Introducing molecular selectivity in rapid impedimetric sensing of phthalates. In: Instrumentation and measurement technology conference (I2MTC) Proceedings, 2014 IEEE International. IEEE, pp 838–843Google Scholar
  61. Zia AI et al (2013) Technique for rapid detection of phthalates in water and beverages. J Food Eng 116:515–523Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anindya Nag
    • 1
    Email author
  • Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
    • 2
  • Jurgen Kosel
    • 3
  1. 1.School of EngineeringMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of EngineeringMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.King Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyThuwalSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations