Skip to main content

Competing for Space and Making a Difference? An Assessment of Sustainability Standards in the Indian Cotton Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business Responsibility and Sustainability in India

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Indian Management ((PAIM))

Abstract

Multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainability in agribusiness are an emerging research, policy and practice issue in India. This chapter examines the issue of sustainability in the cotton sector and the role and performance of various sustainability standards. It compares various cotton sustainability standards as they are practised in India and finds that various sustainability standards coexist in India’s cotton sector with a certain degree of overlaps. These developments must be understood within the broader context of the farm sector in India where smallholders dominate and the cotton production sector suffered from serious crises in the 1990s and early 2000s in the form of crop failures, farmer indebtedness and suicides. The chapter concludes by summarizing the major findings and highlighting policy and practice insights for promoting more effective sustainability in the cotton sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Argade, A., and S. Singh. 2016. Seeking Markets in Production Fields: An Assessment of the Potential of Fair Trade in India. Millennial Asia 7 (2): 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedi, J.S., and R. Verma. 2011. State of Fabric Production Units in India. Economic and Political Weekly 46 (4): 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevilacqua, N., F.E. Ciarapica, G. Mazzutto, and C. Paciarotti. 2014. Environmental Analysis of a Cotton Yarn Supply Chain. Journal of Cleaner Production 82: 154–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitzer, V. 2012. Partnering for Change in Chains: The Capacity of Partnerships to Promote Sustainable Change in Global Agrifood Chains. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 15 (Special Issue B): 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, A.W., P.J.C. Harris, A.H. Hofny-Collins, N. Pasiecznik, and R.R. Wallace. 2000. Organic Production and Ethical Trade: Definition, Practice and Links. Food Policy 25 (1): 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliskan, K. 2010. Market Threads: How Cotton Farmers and Traders Create Global Commodity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chico, D., M.A. Aldaya, and A. Garrido. 2013. A Water Footprint Assessment of a Pair of Jeans: The Influence of Agricultural Policies on the Sustainability of Consumer Products. Journal of Cleaner Production 57: 238–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhingra, J. 2014. From Field to Fashion—Mainstreaming the Midstream: Better Cotton Fast Track Program—End Year Report 2013. IDH.

    Google Scholar 

  • DtE (Down to Earth). 2013. Organic Thread—Cover Story, February 16–28, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • FICCI. 2012. Cotton 2020—Roadmap for Sustainable Production. New Delhi: FICCI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., and R. Mathews. n.d. C&A’s Water Footprint Strategy: Cotton Clothing Supply Chain. Water Footprint Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • FTF. 2012. Impact of Fair Trade Cotton, Summary and Management Response to an Independent Impact Study. London: Fairtrade Foundation (FTF), May.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Fairtrade and Cotton. London: Fairtrade Foundation, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • FTI (Fair Trade International). 2016. Scope and Benefits of Fairtrade, 7th ed. 2015. Bonn: FTI.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoI (Government of India). 2017. Status Paper of Indian Cotton. DCD (Directorate of Cotton Development), MoAFW, GoI, Nagpur, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosscurt, C., A. de G. Ruiz, and V. Fobelets. 2016. The True Price of Cotton from India. Amsterdam: True Price and IDH.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAC. 2008. Literature Review and Research Evaluation Relating to Social Impacts of Global Cotton Production for ICAC Expert Panel on Social, Environmental and Economic Performance of Cotton (SEEP), July. Accessed May 29, 2014. http://www.indianet.nl/pdf/ICAC_LiteratureReview.pdf.

  • ICCO, Organic Exchange and Solidaridad. 2010. Integrity in the Indian Organic Cotton Value Chain: A Summary of Issues and Gaps for Potential Action, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development). 2005. Organic Agriculture and Poverty Reduction in Asia: China and India Focus, Thematic Evaluation. IFAD Report No. 1664, Rome, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. 2016. Child Labour in Cotton: A Briefing. Geneva: Fundamentals, ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S.. 2010. Indian Textile Industry: A Growth Perspective. A presentation in Singapore, March. Accessed May 21, 2014. www.ica-ltd.org/media/layout/documents/event.../Sachit_Jain.pdf.

  • Joshi Rai, K. 2011. The IKEA Experience of Moving Towards a Better Cotton Supply Chain: Making Sustainability Work. IDH Case Study, Editor: Paul Mundy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konduru, S., et al. 2013. A Study of Mechanisation of Cotton Harvesting in India and Its Implications. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, B 3: 789–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naik, G., and M. Abraham. n.d. Information Asymmetry in Cotton Markets in India. Centre for Public Policy, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naik, G., S. MacDonald, and R. Landes. n.d.. Markets, Institutions and Quality of Agricultural Products: Cotton Quality in India. IIMB WP 314, IIM, Bangalore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, A.K.J.R. 2013. A Report on Producer’s Companies in India. DEAR, NABARD, Mumbai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, V., and S. Smith. 2011. Fairtrade Cotton: Assessing Impact in Mali, Senegal, Cameroon and India—Synthesis Report. University of Greenwich and IDS Sussex, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osakwe, E. 2009. Cotton Fact Sheet—India, May 19. https://www.icac.org/econ_stats/country_facts/e_india.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • PAN, Solidaridad and WWF. 2017. Sustainable Cotton Ranking, 2017—Assessing Company Performance. PAN UK, Solidaridad and WWF.

    Google Scholar 

  • PKVY. 2017. Paramparagat Krishi Vikas Yojana (PKVY) Manual for District-Level Functionaries. https://darpg.gov.in/sites/default/files/Paramparagat%20Krishi%20Vikas%20Yojana.pdf.

  • Quark, A.A. 2013. Global Rivalries: Standards Wars and the Transnational Cotton Trade. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanjaneyulu, G.V. 2011. Innovating on Pest Management: Practices and Processes. Innovation and Development 1 (1): 155–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganathan, T., S. Gaurav, and I.I. Halder. 2018. Pesticide Usage by Cotton Farmers in India: Changes Over a Decade. EPW 53 (19): 43–51, May 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, V.P., and H. Thaker. 2010. Fertiliser Subsidies in India: Who Are the Beneficiaries? EPW 45 (12): 68–76, March 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. 2009. Organic Produce Supply Chains in India: Organisation and Governance. New Delhi: Allied.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Contract Farming for Sustainable Agricultural Development in India: A Smallholder Perspective. Workshop on Policy Options and Investment Priorities for Accelerating Agricultural Productivity and Development in India, November 10–11, 2011, India International Centre, New Delhi. Organised by IGIDR, Mumbai; Planning Commission, New Delhi; IHD, Delhi; World Bank, Delhi and FAO, Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. “White Gold” for Whom? A Study of Institutional Aspects of Work and Wages in Cotton GPNs in India. In Critical Perspectives on Work and Employment in Globalizing India, ed. Ernesto Noronha and Premila D’Çruz, 15–36. Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sneyd, A. 2014. When Governance Gets Going: Certifying ‘Better Cotton’ and ‘Better Sugarcane’. Development and Change 45 (2): 231–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayleur, C., A. Balmford, G.M. Buchanan, S.H.M. Butchart, C.C. Walker, H. Ducharme, R.E. Green, et al. 2018. Where Are Commodity Crops Certified, and What Does It Mean for Conservation and Poverty Alleviation? Biological Conservation 217: 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truscott, L., and others. 2016. Organic Cotton Market Report, 2016. Textile Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, A., K. Newitt, and L. Merouchi. 2013. Better Cotton and Decent Work: Activities, Impacts and Lesson Learned, (Executive Summary). London: Ergon Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF International. 2007. Cleaner, Greener Cotton: Impacts and Better Management Practices. WWF International, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF and Yes Bank. 2012. Cotton Market and Sustainability in India. Delhi: WWF-India.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sukhpal Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Singh, S. (2019). Competing for Space and Making a Difference? An Assessment of Sustainability Standards in the Indian Cotton Sector. In: Arora, B., Budhwar, P., Jyoti, D. (eds) Business Responsibility and Sustainability in India. Palgrave Studies in Indian Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13716-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics