Skip to main content

The Body, Power and Dieting: Beyond the Binary

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Politics of Weight

Abstract

This chapter concludes Watching our Weight, drawing together the overall themes for the book and putting forward potentialities for further research. The book contributes to feminist understandings of the body, building upon the intersections between Foucault’s Discipline and Punish (1977) and post-structuralist feminist scholarship (Bordo 1993; Bartky in Writing on the body: Female embodiment and feminist theory. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 129-154, 1997). Through the lens of dieting, this book extends understandings of the ever-changing nature of power. Equally, using empirical interviews, the book extends some of Deveaux’s (1994) criticism of some post-structuralist feminist work. Secondly, the book addresses a gap on race within Discipline and Punish (1977) through the lens of dieting. Foucault is often accused of presenting the body as having only “one” experience of discipline (Bartky in Writing on the body: Female embodiment and feminist theory. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 129-154, 1997; Sawicki in Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power, and the body. Psychology Press. New York, 1991). This book draws on black feminist scholarship to speak directly to these gaps through the lens of dieting. Utilizing narratives surrounding Oprah Winfrey’s body, I combine the aforementioned study to discuss the dieting body and how it speaks to socio-historical narratives of black femininity (Hine et al. in We specialize in the wholly impossible: A reader in black women’s history (Vol. 17). New York University Press, New York, 1995; Thompson in Feminist Media Studies 15:794–812, 2015; Wallace-Sanders in Skin deep, spirit strong: The black female body in American culture. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2002). Finally, the relationship between the book’s theoretical approach and empirical sources makes an original contribution to feminist work on the body. Drawing on both interviews with dieters and fat activists, the project demonstrates how the dichotomy of power is active in areas of “submission” and “resistance”. Although Cooper’s Fat Activism: A Radical Social Movement documents the history of the fat movement at great length, there is seemingly little to no research that brings together interviews from dieters and fat activists, as well as an in-depth case study of Oprah Winfrey’s dieting journey. Thus, the original contribution of this book comes from the relationship between the theoretical approach and empirical analysis, creating an original voice that extends post-structuralist feminist scholarship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Unlike Slimming World and Weight Watchers group meetings, The Cambridge Weight Plan provides “one-to-one support to create a personalised weight-loss plan”. Each dieter has their own consultant, who helps them through four stages of weight-loss preparation. The purpose of the programme is to provide “stabilisation and long-term weight management” (Cambridge Weight Plan 2018).

  2. 2.

    The 5:2 diet is not tied to a particular company, but was released by a “diet guru” in The Fast Diet. Dieters are encouraged to consume a “normal amount of calories” for five days of the week and then fast for two days of the week by eating 25% of one’s original intake. This is specified as 500 calories for women and 600 calories for men throughout the day (Fisher 2013).

  3. 3.

    In recent years, the “clean” eating movement has become a dominant trend on social media websites, particularly Instagram (Blair 2017). At its heart, clean eating is about eating nothing but “whole” or “unprocessed” foods (Wilson 2017), a lifestyle which has been encouraged by “wellness” bloggers such as Madeleine Shaw and Amelia Freer (Niven 2017). The diet’s underlying messages of purity and cleanliness suggest interesting discourses relating to femininity and the body.

Bibliography

  • Alcoff, L. (1988). Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 13(3), pp. 405–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attwood, F. (2004). Pornography and objectification. Feminist Media Studies, 4(1), pp. 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attwood, F. (2005). Fashion and passion: Marketing sex to women. Sexualities, 8(4), pp. 392–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbus, L. (1987). Disciplining women: Michel Foucault and the power of feminist discourse. Feminism as Critique (4), pp. 466–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S.L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S.L. (1997). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In Katie Conboy, Nadia Medina, and Sarah Stanbury (eds.), Writing on the body: Female embodiment and feminist theory, pp. 129–154. New York. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S.L. (2002). Suffering to be beautiful. Gender struggles: Practical approaches to contemporary feminism, (48), pp. 241–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, O. (2017). Is the clean eating revolution over? Retrieved from: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/clean-eating-is-it-over-dirty-truth-bbc-deliciously-ella-instagram-a7544246.html. Date Accessed: 12 February 2018.

  • Bordo, S. (1989). The body and the reproduction of femininity: A feminist appropriation of Foucault. In A. Jagger and S. Bordo (eds.), Gender/body/knowledge. New Brunswick. Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, S. (1997). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Berkeley and Los Angeles. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. (2002). Postfeminisms: Feminism, cultural theory and cultural forms. London. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Femininity. New York. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1986). Sex and gender in Simone de Beauvoir’s second sex. Yale French Studies, (72), pp. 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2011). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. Oxon. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge Weight Plan. (2018). Cambridge Weight Plan. Retrieved from: https://www.cambridgeweightplan.com/find-a-consultant?gclid=CjwKCAiAuMTfBRAcEiwAV4SDkYb5HBK8lcMClKD5KwAPsGHcfBM8cainM1IIwY_PbYyqJLRTHqzYrBoC03kQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds. Date Accessed: 18 November 2018.

  • Chernin, K. (1981). The Obsession: Reflections on the tyranny of slenderness. New York. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P.H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), pp. s14–s32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P.H. (2000). Gender, black feminism, and black political economy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568(1), pp. 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P.H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P.H. (2004). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, B.C. (2016). But some of us are brave: Black women’s studies. New York. The Feminist Press at CUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. (2016). Shadow on a Tightrope, the book that made me fat. Date Accessed: 8 March 2017. Retrieved from: http://obesitytimebomb.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/shadow-on-tightrope-book-that-made-me.html.

  • Crenshaw, K. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, pp. 1241–1299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York. The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daigle, M.D. (2015). From Cuba with love. Oakley, California. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daigle, M. (2016). Writing the lives of others: Storytelling and international politics. Millennium, 45(1), pp. 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deveaux, M. (1994). Feminism and empowerment: A critical reading of Foucault. Feminist Studies, 20(2), pp. 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, S.H. (1975). Not in man’s image: Lesbians and the cultural oppression of body image. Women & Therapy, 8(1–2), pp. 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P. ed. (1993). Theory on gender: Feminism on theory. New York. Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadyl, J.K. and Nicholls, D.A. (2013). Foucault, the subject and the research interview: A critique of methods. Nursing Inquiry, 20(1), pp. 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P.C., Vartanian, L.R. and Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women’s body image concerns and mood. Body Image, 13, pp. 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, G. (1985). Patriarchy and pleasure: The pornographic eye/I. CTheory, 9(1–2), pp. 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. (2013). What is the 5.2 diet? Retrieved from: https://www.bbcgoodfood.com/howto/guide/what-52-diet. Date Accessed: 12 February 2018.

  • Flax, J. (1987). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12(4), pp. 621–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. London. Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavey, N. (1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis. Toward a new psychology of gender, pp. 49–64. New York. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavey, N. (2013). Just sex?: The cultural scaffolding of rape. London. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, R. (2014). Bad feminist. New York. HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, G. (1971). The female eunuch. London. Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammonds, E. (2004). Black (w)holes and the geometry of black female sexuality. In J. Bobo, C. Hudley and C. Michel (eds.), The black studies reader, pp. 301–314. New York. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, B. and Tiggemann, M. (2008). The effect of thin ideal media images on women’s self-objectification, mood, and body image. Sex Roles, 58(9–10), pp. 649–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S.J. (1996). Am I thin enough yet?: The cult of thinness and the commercialization of identity. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S.N. ed. (2013). Feminist research practice: A primer. London. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S.N. and Leavy, P. (2010). The practice of qualitative research. London. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, D.C., King, W. and Reed, L. eds. (1995). We specialize in the wholly impossible: A reader in black women’s history (Vol. 17). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1981). Ain’t I a woman black women and feminism. London. Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Cambridge. South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1992). Selling hot pussy. In b. hooks (ed.), Black looks: Race and representation. London. Turnaround.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. London. Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (2006). Black looks: Race and representation. Vancouver. Academic Internet Pub Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, S. (2005). ‘Body art’ and social status: Cutting, tattooing and piercing from a feminist perspective. Feminism & Psychology, 10(4), pp. 409–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, S. (2008). The idea of prostitution. North Melbourne. Spinifex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, M., Pilcher, K. and Smith, N. eds. (2015). Queer sex work. London. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A. (2006). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumby, C. (1997). Bad girls: The media, sex and feminism in the ‘90s. New South Wales. Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2012). Fat. London. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabe, A.G., Forney, K.J. and Keel, P.K. (2014). Do you “like” my photo? Facebook use maintains eating disorder risk. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47(5), pp. 516–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElya, M. (2007). Clinging to Mammy: The faithful slave in twentieth-century America. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (1982). The politics of feminist research: Between talk, text and action. Feminist Review, 12(1), pp. 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2004). Post‐feminism and popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), pp. 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metta, M. (2010). Writing against, alongside and beyond memory: Lifewriting as reflexive, poststructuralist feminist research practice. London. Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics. Urbana. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niven, L. (2017). What is clean eating, anyway? Date Accessed: 12 February 2018. Retrieved from: http://www.vogue.co.uk/article/what-is-clean-eating.

  • O’Brien Hallstein, D.L. (2011). She gives birth, she’s wearing a bikini: Mobilizing the post-pregnant celebrity mom body to manage the post–second wave crisis in femininity. Women’s Studies in Communication, 34(2), pp. 111–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbach, S. (1998). Fat is a feminist issue: The Anti-diet guide for women+ fat is a feminist (No. 2). London. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paglia, C. (1990). Madonna—Finally, a real feminist. New York Times, 14, p. A39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, T.O. (2006). Hey girl, am I more than my hair?: African American women and their struggles with beauty, body image, and hair. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 18(2), pp. 24–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, V.K. (1996). Women in chains: The legacy of slavery in black women’s fiction. New York. SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penny, L. (2011). Meat market: Female flesh under capitalism. London. John Hunt Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perloff, R.M. (2014). Social media effects on young women’s body image concerns: Theoretical perspectives and an agenda for research. Sex Roles, 71(11–12), pp. 363–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, N. (2016). Transgressive bodies: Representations in film and popular culture. London. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roiphe, K. (1998). The morning after: Sex, fear and feminism. London. Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, J. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. The American Journal of Sociology, 97(3), pp. 897–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothblum, E.D. and Solovay, S. eds. (2009). The fat studies reader. New York. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawicki, J. (1991). Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power, and the body. New York. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekayi, D. (2003). Aesthetic resistance to commercial influences: The impact of the Eurocentric beauty standard on Black college women. Journal of Negro Education, 72, pp. 467–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallow Hal. (2001). Produced by Farrelly, P. and Farrelly, B. Conundrum Entertainment. 20th Century Fox, 2001, 113 minutes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.C. (2009). Cultural encyclopedia of the body. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 48(4), pp. 403–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, C.H. (1995). Who stole feminism?: How women have betrayed women. New York. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, U.Y. (1998). Making waves: The theory and practice of Black feminism. The Black Scholar, 28(2), pp. 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (2015). Neoliberalism, soul food, and the weight of black women. Feminist Media Studies, 15(5), pp. 794–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace-Sanders, K. (2002). Skin deep, spirit strong: The black female body in American culture. Ann Arbor. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace-Sanders, K. (2008). Mammy: A century of race, gender, and southern memory. Ann Arbor. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E.F. (2010). Dark continent of our bodies: Black feminism & politics of respectability. Philadelphia, PA. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.D. (2004). Conquering the fear of a fat body: The journey toward myself. In Ophira Edut (ed.), Body outlaws: Young women write about body image and identity. Seattle, WA. Seal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams-Forson, P.A. (2006). Building houses out of chicken legs: Black women, food, and power. Chapel Hill. University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. and Wittig, M.A. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but…”: Factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37(11–12), pp. 885–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (2017). The long read: Why we fell for clean eating. Date Accessed: 12 February 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/aug/11/why-we-fell-for-clean-eating.

  • Wolf, N. (1999). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amelia Morris .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morris, A. (2019). The Body, Power and Dieting: Beyond the Binary. In: The Politics of Weight. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13670-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13670-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13669-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13670-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics