Clean & Lean Production in Fish Canning Industry—A Case Study

  • Anna Bella Siriban-ManalangEmail author
  • Jamica B. Brillante
  • Frances Isabel V. Cabahug
  • Rozanne P. Flores


The application of Clean Production (CP) and Lean Thinking had been explored to reduce the environmental impacts of fish canning processes. An industry-wide survey was conducted to access the current system architecture of the fish canning companies in terms of their environmental practices and lean tools used. By conducting a case study, the CP assessment identified the overall and per operation waste in the fish canning process where material balances showed five (5) main waste streams. A comprehensive set of CP options were proposed to eliminate the waste streams. To solve the production waste while managing the problem of decreasing raw fish supply and increasing tin can prices, lean engineering was conducted. The cleaner production assessment identified the overall and per operation waste in the fish canning process. Major environmental wastes identified include water, tin cans, fish meat, and energy. Moreover, non-value adding wastes surfaced in the lean production assessment are overproduction, waiting, transportation, and inventory. Proposed solutions were analyzed through a cost and benefit analysis. Results show that implementing clean and lean technologies can provide the company good benefits. There is evidence to show that the implementation of clean and lean technologies will greatly reduce the environmental impact of the fish canning industry.


  1. Abdullah, F. (2003). Lean manufacturing tools and techniques in the process industry with a focus on steel. University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 245 p.Google Scholar
  2. Achanga, P., Shehab, P., Roy, R., & Nelder, G. (2006). Critical success factors for Lean implementation within SME’s. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(4), 460–471.Google Scholar
  3. Chatfield, M. M. (n.d.). Self-directed and self-managed teams. Retrieved September 7, 2004, from
  4. Consulting With Engineers and Planners. (2000). Cleaner production assessment in fish processing. Division of Technology, Industry and Economics Denmark: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).Google Scholar
  5. Development Bank of the Philippines. (1999). An evaluation guide for environmental projects in the fish canning industry. Environmental Infrastructure Support Credit Programme.Google Scholar
  6. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs. (1991). PREPARE manual for the prevention of waste and emissions.Google Scholar
  7. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations. (2001). Production, accessibility, marketing and consumption patterns of freshwater aquaculture products in Asia: A cross-country comparison. Retrieved July 10, 2009, from
  8. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations. (2009). Handling fish before canning. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from
  9. Krafcik, J. F. (1998). Triumph of the lean production system. Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 41–51.Google Scholar
  10. Liker, J. K. (Ed.). (1997). Becoming lean: Inside stories of U.S. manufacturers. Portland: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Mothersell, W. M. (2000). Understanding the diffusion of lean production: The integration of technology and people in lean production (196 p.). Michigan, USA: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  13. Motwani, J. (2003). A business process change framework for examining lean manufacturing: A case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(5), 339–346.Google Scholar
  14. Pagell, M., & LePine, J. A. (1999). Characteristics of the manufacturing environment that influence team success. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 3, 21–25.Google Scholar
  15. Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tajiri, M., & Gotoh, F. (1992). TPM implementation: A Japanese approach. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Thrane, M., Nielsen, E. H., & Christensen, P. (2009). Cleaner production in Danish fish processing—Experiences, status and possible future strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 3(17), 1–11.Google Scholar
  18. United Nations. (2015). Sustainable development goals. Retrieved August 12, 2018, from
  19. United Nation Environmental Program (1991). Audit and reduction manual for industrial emissions and wastes. Technical Report Series No. 7.Google Scholar
  20. United Nation Industrial Development Organization/United Nation Environment Program. (1995). Guidance materials for the UNIDO/UNEP National cleaner production centers, Vienna, Austria/Paris, France.Google Scholar
  21. United Nation Industrial Development Organization/United Nation Environment Program. (1996). Guidance Materials for the UNIDO/UNEP National Cleaner Production Centers, Vienna, Austria/Paris, France.Google Scholar
  22. United States Environment Protection Agency (1992). Facility pollution prevention guide.Google Scholar
  23. Uttamangkabovorn, M., Prasertsan, P., & Kittikun, A. H. (2005). Water conservation in canned tuna (pet food) plant in Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 547–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Womack, J. P., & Jones, J. T. (2003). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Bella Siriban-Manalang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jamica B. Brillante
    • 2
  • Frances Isabel V. Cabahug
    • 2
  • Rozanne P. Flores
    • 2
  1. 1.Resources, Environment and Economics Center for StudiesMakati CityPhilippines
  2. 2.De La Salle UniversityManilaPhilippines

Personalised recommendations