• Siwa MsangiEmail author
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 50)


This chapter orients the reader to the key policy issues and complex trade-offs that decision-makers and managers face when trying to promote agricultural sustainability and good resource management practices, and the types of decision-support tools that they might find useful. The types of analytical approaches that are best-suited for capturing the critical behavioral dimensions of agents at a micro-level or at the more aggregate market-level implications are briefly discussed, and the challenge for dealing with data-scarce environments is also raised. The chapter gives a brief overview of the main sections of the book, and points to the novel empirical applications that highlight the need for robust tools in analyzing agricultural production, market and resource management problems.


  1. Chambers, R. G. (1988). Applied production analysis: A dual approach. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Golan, A., Judge, G. G., & Miller, D. (1996). Financial Economics and Quantitative Analysis Series: Maximum entropy econometrics: Robust estimation with limited data.. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Heckelei, T., & Britz, W. (2000). Positive mathematical programming with multiple data points: A cross-sectional estimation procedure. Cahiers d’Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), 57, 28–50. Retrieved from
  4. Heckelei, T., & Wolff, H. (2003). Estimation of constrained optimisation models for agricultural supply analysis based on generalised maximum entropy. European Review of Agriculture Economics, 30(1), 27–50. Scholar
  5. Henry de Frahan, B., Buysse, J., Polomé, P., Fernagut, B., Harmignie, O., Lauwers, L., … Meensel, J. (2007). Positive mathematical programming for agricultural and environmental policy analysis: Review and practice. In Handbook of operations research in natural resources (pp. 129–154). Boston, MA, US: Springer.
  6. Jansson, T., & Heckelei, T. (2011). Estimating a primal model of regional crop supply in the European Union. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(1), 137–152. Scholar
  7. Júdez, L., Chaya, C., Martı́nez, S., & González, A. A. (2001). Effects of the measures envisaged in “Agenda 2000” on arable crop producers and beef and veal producers: An application of positive mathematical programming to representative farms of a Spanish region. Agricultural Systems, 67(2), 121–138. Scholar
  8. Marsh, T., Mittelhammer, R., & Cardell, N. (2014). Generalized maximum entropy analysis of the linear simultaneous equations model. Entropy, 16(2), 825–853. Scholar
  9. Merel, P., Yi, F., Lee, J., & Six, J. (2014). A regional bio-economic model of nitrogen use in cropping. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(1), 67–91. Scholar
  10. Mittelhammer, R., Judge, G. G., & Miller, D. (2000). Econometric foundations. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Önal, H., & McCarl, B. A. (1991). Exact aggregation in mathematical programming sector models. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d’agroeconomie, 39(2), 319–334. Scholar
  12. Paris, Q., & Howitt, R. E. (1998). An analysis of ill-posed production problems using maximum entropy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 124–138. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Food Policy Research InstituteWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations