Differences in Health Information Literacy Competencies Among Older Adults, Elderly and Younger Citizens
- 1k Downloads
To address the research gap on age-based differences in health information literacy (HIL), we investigated how younger (born 1960–) and older adults (1946–1960), and elderly citizens (–1945) differed from each other by their HIL competencies. Data were collected with an online survey of patients using the Swedish national electronic health record system. Altogether, 2,587 users responded. One-way ANOVA with post hoc tests revealed several differences between the groups: younger adults were less likely to value health information than older adults; older adults and elderly were least likely to compare information from multiple sources and had trouble in determining health information needs; older adults were most likely to have trouble understanding health terminology and the elderly to have difficulties in understanding medicinal package labels. The study shows that HIL is not necessarily improving or declining but adapting to challenges of advanced age.
KeywordsHealth information literacy Older adults Elderly Young
The data collection was a part of the work of the Swedish DOME research consortium (projectdome.wordpress.com). This study was conducted in collaboration between DOME consortium and the Academy of Finland funded research project Taking Health Information Behaviour into Account (HIBA).
- 3.Eriksson-Backa, K., Ek, S.: Health information literacy and communication in healthcare contexts: a study of older Finnish adults. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Health Information Management Research (ISHIMR 2015), 24–26 June 2015, pp. 77–91. York St. John University and University of Sheffield, York (2015)Google Scholar
- 5.Enwald, H., et al.: Relationship between everyday health information literacy and attitudes towards mobile technology among older people. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Boustany, J., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Roy, L. (eds.) ECIL 2017. CCIS, vol. 810, pp. 450–459. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9_47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Huvila, I., Ek, S., Enwald, H., Eriksson-Backa, K., Hirvonen, N., Känsäkoski, H.: Taking health information behaviour into account in the design of e-health services. Finn. J. eHealth eWelfare 8(4), 153–163 (2016). https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/60194
- 8.ALA: Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Final report (1989). http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential
- 11.Huhta, A.-M., Hirvonen, N., Huotari, M.-L.: Concepts related to health literacy in online information environments: a systematic review with an emphasis on approach to information. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Boustany, J., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Roy, L. (eds.) ECIL 2017. CCIS, vol. 810, pp. 460–469. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9_48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Hirvonen, N., Niemelä, R., Ek, S., Korpelainen, R., Huotari, M-L.: Socio-demographic characteristics associated with the everyday health information literacy of young men. Inf. Res. 20(1) (2015). paper: isic25Google Scholar
- 17.Enwald, H., et al.: Health information behaviour, attitudes towards health information and motivating factors for encouraging physical activity among older people: differences by sex and age. Inf. Res. 22(1) (2017). paper isic1623Google Scholar
- 18.Suri, V.R., Chang, Y.-K., Majid, S., Foo, S.: Health information literacy of senior citizens – a review. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Catts, R. (eds.) ECIL 2014. CCIS, vol. 492, pp. 128–137. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14136-7_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar