Abstract
How did these France and Australia develop a deep strategic partnership, when only about two decades ago, a group of Australians bombed the French consulate in Perth to protest against French nuclear testing in the Pacific? Which interests, which personalities, which elements of the global context have led France and Australia to engage in a regional and global rapprochement, and what have been the human, economic and political prerequisites which enabled it? This book aims to investigate the dynamics behind this historically ambiguous relationship. More precisely, this study explains why and how France and Australia are currently engaged in a process of strategic and economic mutual empowerment and how this rapprochement has been possible, owing to thirty years of diplomatic efforts to overcome ongoing culturally and historically constructed misunderstandings and conflicts. This book demonstrates how French and Australian foreign policy-makers have understood that, in regard to their numerous common interests, both countries had to mutually empower each other in order to strengthen their own power, regionally and globally. This chapter argues that these inclusive dynamics of empowerment constitute the response of two diverse middle powers to current global threats and represent a tool suitable for modernising the strategies and practices of both countries’ diplomacies. This book is the first to propose an answer to these questions through the development of the French–Australian strategic partnership.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Archives Nationales, Pierrefitte, France.
National Archives of Australia, Canberra, Australia.
Antheaume, B & Bonnemaison, J 1988, Atlas des îles des États du Pacifique Sud, GIP Reclus/Publisud, Paris.
Beeson, M 2014, ‘The Rise of the Indo-Pacific’, The Conversation, 3 May, viewed 30 October 2017, http://theconversation.com/the-rise-of-the-indo-pacific-26271.
Beeson, M & Hameiri, S 2017, Navigating the New International Disorder, Australia in World Affairs 2011–2015, Oxford Press, Oxford.
Blainey, G 1983, The Tyranny of Distance, Sun Books, Sydney.
Brenner, N 1999, ‘Globalisation as Reterritorialization: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union’, Urban Studies, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 431–451.
Brown, A 2010, ‘The Gorbachev Revolution and the End of the Cold War’, in MP Leffler & OA Westad (eds), The Cambridge History of the Cold War, Endings, Vol III, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 244–266.
Davison, R & Khan, S 2014, ‘ANZUS and the Rise of China’, in D Baldino, A Carr & AJ Langlois (eds), Australian Foreign Policy, Controversies and Debates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 136–154.
De Montbrial, T & Gomart, T 2017, Notre intérêt national, quelle politique étrangère pour la France? Odile Jacob, Paris.
Deutsch, K 1968, The Analysis of International Relations, Prentice Hall International, Englewood Cliffs.
Di Méo, G 1996, Les territoires du quotidien, L’Harmattan, Paris.
Farge, A 2002, ‘Penser et définir l’événement en histoire. Approche des situations et des acteurs sociaux’, Terrain, vol. 38, pp. 69–78.
Frank, R, Haba, K & Momose, H 2009, The End of the Cold War and the Regional Integration, Aoyama Gakuin University Press, Tokyo.
Guéhenno, J-M 1999, ‘Américanisation du monde ou mondialisation de l’Amérique?’ Politique Étrangère, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 7–20.
Langmore, J, Frydenberg, J & Parke, M 2014, ‘The Liberal/Labor Tradition’, in D Baldino, A Carr & AJ Langlois (eds), Australian Foreign Policy, Controversies and Debates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 19–38.
Lévy, J & Lussault, M 2009, Dictionnaire de la géographie et de l’espace des sociétés, Belin, Paris.
McDougall, D 2009, Australian Foreign Relations, Entering the 21st Century, Pearson, Sydney.
Mrgudovic, N 2008, La France dans le Pacifique sud: les enjeux de la puissance, L’Harmattan, Paris.
Murray, P, Warleigh-Lack, A & He, B 2014, ‘Awkward States and Regional Organisations: The United Kingdom and Australia Compared’, Comparative European Politics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 279–300.
Nederveen Pieterse, J 1994, ‘Globalisation as Hybridization’, International Sociology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–184.
Nye, JS 2011, The Future of Power, Public Affairs, New York.
Offenstadt, N 2006, Les mots de l’historien, Presses Universitaires du Mirail, Toulouse.
Perkins, DD & Zimmerman, MA 1995, ‘Empowerment Theory, Research and Application’, American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 569–579.
Piquet, M 2000, Cold War in Warm Waters: Reflections on Australian and French Mutual Misunderstandings in the Pacific, The University of Melbourne Press, Melbourne.
Védrine, H 2001, France in an Age of Globalisation, Brookings Institution Press, Washington.
White, H 2017, ‘The United States or China: ‘We Don’t Have to Choose’’, in M Beeson & S Hameiri (eds), Navigating the New International Disorder, Australia in World Affairs 2011–2015, Oxford Press, Oxford, pp. 93–108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soyez, P. (2019). Introduction. In: Australia and France’s Mutual Empowerment. Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13449-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13449-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13448-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13449-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)