Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Science and Fiction ((SCIFICT))

  • 744 Accesses

Abstract

All the varieties of “fake physics” discussed so far, from sci-fi to April Fool jokes, were designed purely for entertainment purposes. Entertainment plays an important role in this chapter too—but the spoofs and hoaxes described here all had another, more serious purpose behind them. To start with, we look at a few of the much-publicized “sting operations” that have been used to trick journals and conferences with very low editorial standards. Next comes the famous Sokal hoax—and others like it—where the target shifts from lazy editors to politically partisan ones. Finally, we consider the ways in which physics has been affected by the current fashion for “fake news”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Military intelligence” is often taken to be an oxymoron; Jones was a notable exception to this.

References

  1. J. Stribling, M. Krohn, D. Aguayo, SCIgen: an automatic CS paper generator. https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/archive/scigen/

  2. Prank Fools US Science Conference. BBC News (April 2005). http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4449651.stm

  3. R. Van Noorden, Publishers withdraw more than 120 Gibberish papers. Nature (February 2014). https://www.nature.com/news/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763

  4. E. Hunt, Nonsense paper written by iOS autocomplete accepted for conference. The Guardian (October 2016). https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/oct/22/nonsense-paper-written-by-ios-autocomplete-accepted-for-conference

  5. P. Aldhous, CRAP paper accepted by journal. New Scientist (June 2009). https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17288-crap-paper-accepted-by-journal/

  6. D. Butler, Investigating journals: the dark side of publishing. Nature (March 2013). https://www.nature.com/news/investigating-journals-the-dark-side-of-publishing-1.12666

  7. M. Laakso, B.-C. Björk, Anatomy of open access publishing. BMC Medicine 10, 124–132 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Neuroskeptic, Predatory journals hit by star wars sting. Discovermagazine.com (July 2017). http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2017/07/22/predatory-journals-star-wars-sting/

  9. Z. Faulkes, Stinging the predators. Version 8.2 (October 2018). https://figshare.com/articles/Stinging_the_Predators_A_collection_of_papers_that_should_never_have_been_published/5248264

  10. N.T. Redd, Fake science paper about star trek and warp 10 was accepted by predatory journals. Space.com (February 2018). https://www.space.com/39672-fake-star-trek-science-paper-published.html

  11. Memory alpha episode summary for “Threshold”. http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Threshold_(episode)

  12. M. Gault, Scientist published papers based on Rick and Morty to expose predatory academic journals. vice.com (October 2018). https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/3km5j8/scientist-published-papers-based-on-rick-and-morty-to-expose-predatory-academic-journals

  13. M. Lynch, Is a science peace process necessary? The One Culture (University of Chicago Press, 2001), pp. 48–60

    Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Sardar, Thomas Kuhn and the Science Wars (Icon Books, Cambridge, 2000), pp. 4–7

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.D. Sokal, Transgressing the boundaries: towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text #46/47 (Spring/Summer 1996). https://physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html

  16. R. Sheldrake, In the Vale of soul-making. https://www.sheldrake.org/about-rupert-sheldrake/interviews/in-the-vale-of-soul-making

  17. A.D. Sokal, A physicist experiments with cultural studies. Lingua Franca (May/June 1996). https://physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/lingua_franca_v4/lingua_franca_v4.html

  18. J. Delingpole, Do penises cause climate change? The Spectator (June 2017). https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/06/do-penises-cause-climate-change-discuss/

  19. Hoax bacteria study tricks climate sceptics. Reuters (8 November 2007). https://uk.reuters.com/article/environment-climate-hoax-dc/hoax-bacteria-study-tricks-climate-skeptics-idUKL0887458220071108

  20. D.A. Klein, et al., Carbon dioxide production by benthic bacteria. researchgate.net. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241480752_Carbon_dioxide_production_by_benthic_bacteria_the_death_of_manmade_global_warming_theory

  21. T. Chivers, Internet rules and laws. The Daily Telegraph (23 October 2009). https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/6408927/Internet-rules-and-laws-the-top-10-from-Godwin-to-Poe.html

  22. R. Highfield, Al-Qaeda’s atom plans were spoof science. Daily Telegraph (November 2001). https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/1362926/Al-Qaedas-atom-plans-were-spoof-science.html

  23. R.V. Jones, The theory of practical joking: its relevance to physics, in A Random Walk in Science, ed. by R. L. Weber, E. Mendoza, (Institute of Physics, Bristol, 1973), pp. 8–14

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Kasprak, Did a European Scientific Journal conclude 9/11 was a controlled demolition? Snopes.com (October 2016). https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/journal-endorses-911-conspiracy-theory/

  25. M. Robbins, This is a news website article about a scientific paper. The Guardian (September 2010). https://www.theguardian.com/science/the-lay-scientist/2010/sep/24/1

  26. S. Bialy, A. Loeb, Could solar radiation pressure explain ‘Oumuamua’s peculiar acceleration? Astrophys. J. Lett. (November 2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.11490

  27. A. Kasprak, The science behind those viral Oumuamua alien spacecraft stories. Snopes.com (November 2018). https://www.snopes.com/news/2018/11/07/the-science-behind-those-viral-oumuamua-alien-spacecraft-stories/

  28. R.F. Mandelbaum: No, Oumuamua is probably not an alien spaceship. Gizmodo (November 2018). https://gizmodo.com/no-oumuamua-is-probably-not-an-alien-spaceship-1830255239

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

May, A. (2019). Making a Point. In: Fake Physics: Spoofs, Hoaxes and Fictitious Science. Science and Fiction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13314-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics