Evaluation Methods for the Ergatic System Reliability Operator

  • Igor KorobiichukEmail author
  • Andriy Tokar
  • Yuriy Danik
  • Vadim Katuha
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 920)


In modern society, multipurpose hardware, which together with a human operator represents ergatic system, is commonly used to perform various tasks. Effectiveness of such systems depends on reliability of both components. Modern science helps to find ways to improve reliability of hardware at design and production stages, which leads to their effective functioning. However, despite high hardware performance, quality selection, staff training and coaching, the accidents, disasters, disruptions and drop in ergatic task performance continue to take place. 40% to 80% accidents and emergencies in various fields of activity happen due to human error as a result of lack of preparation, adverse psychological factors and fatigue. Therefore, search for ways of assessing reliability of ergatic system operators is an urgent scientific challenge aimed at determining a critical moment of its deterioration. The article suggests methods for assessing reliability of ergatic system operator based on the theory of fuzzy logic, which allows for assessment in terms of individual character and variability of psychological, physiological and professional capabilities and characteristics of operator and his/her sensitivity to the effects of external and internal factors.


The reliability operator The efficiency of work The membership function Ergatic systems 


  1. 1.
    Bodrov, V.A., Orlov, V.Y.: Psychology and Reliability: A Human Being Within the System of Technique Control. Publishing house “The Institute of Psychology of ASR”, Moskva, 288 p. (1998). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Islam, R., Yu, H., Abbassi, R., Garaniya, V., Khan, F.: Development of a monograph for human error likelihood assessment in marine operations. Saf. Sci. 91, 33–39 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Korobiichuk, I., Nowicki, M., Szewczyk, R.: Design of the novel double-ring dynamical gravimeter. J. Autom. Mob. Rob. Intell. Syst. 9(3), 47–52 (2015). Scholar
  4. 4.
    Voronin, A.N., Ziatdinov, Y.K., Kozlov, A.I., Cabanyuk, V.S.: Vector Optimization of Dynamic Systems, 284 p. Techique, Kyiv (1999). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Korobiichuk, I., Ladanyuk, A., Shumyhai, D., Boyko, R., Reshetiuk, V., Kamiński, M.: How to Increase Efficiency of Automatic Control of Complex Plants by Development and Implementation of Coordination Control System. In: Recent Advances in Systems, Control and Information Technology. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 543, pp. 189–195 (2017). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dushkov, B.A., Lomov, B.F., Rubahin, V.F.: The Fundamentals of Engineering Psycology: Text-Book for Technical High Schools, 2nd edn, p. 448. High School, Moskva (1986). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brahman, T.P.: Multi Criteria and Selection in Technique, 288 p. Radio and communication, Moskva (1984). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jahan, A., Edwards, K.L., Bahraminasab, M.: Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Supporting the Selection of Engineering Materials in Product Design, 2nd edn, p. 238. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Korobiichuk, I., Fedushko, S., Juś, A., Syerov, Y.: Methods of determining information support of web community user personal data verification system. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 550, pp. 144–150 (2017). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith, K.M., Larrieu, S.: Mission Adaptive Display Technologies and Operational Decision Making in Aviation, pp. 1–355. IGI Global, Pennsylvania (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gorgo, Y.P., Popduha, Y.A., Tokar, A.M.: The coefficient of evaluation for the quality of operator work in complexes “human-machine”. Abstract scientific and practical conference “The problems of creation, development and application of information systems of special purpose”. Zhitomir military Institute named after S.P. Korolyov at National Aviation University (2009). (in Ukranian)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Korobiichuk, I., Ladanyuk, A., Shumyhai, D., Boyko, R., Reshetiuk, V., Kamiński, M.: How to increase efficiency of automatic control of complex plants by development and implementation of coordination control system. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 543, pp. 189–195 (2017). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Solodkov, A.S., Buharin, V.A., Melnikov, D.S.: Working abilities of sportsmen: its criteria and the ways of correction. The scientific and theoretic journal “The Scientific Notes”, 3(25), 74–79 (2007).
  14. 14.
    Pomeshchikova, I.P., et al.: Influence of exercises and games with ball on coordination abilities of students with disorders of muscular skeletal apparatus. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 16(1), 146–155 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gerasimov, B.M., Divipnyuk, M.M., Subach, I.Y.: The systems of support and decision-making: design, application, efficiency assessment. Sevastopol, 320 p. (2004). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pettang, C., Manjia, M.B., Abanda, F.H.: Decision Support for Construction Cost Control in Developing Countries, p. 385. Pennsylvania, IGI Global (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gerasimov, B.M., Kamyshyn, V.V.: Organizational ergonomics: methods and the algorithms of investigation and design, 212 p. Infosystem, Kyiv (2009). (in Ukranian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor Korobiichuk
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andriy Tokar
    • 2
  • Yuriy Danik
    • 2
  • Vadim Katuha
    • 2
  1. 1.Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAPWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Zhytomyr Military Institute n.a. S.P. KorolyovZhytomyrUkraine

Personalised recommendations