Advertisement

Perspectives on Research, Technology, Policy, and Human Resources for Improved Management of Ultra-Deep Oil and Gas Resources and Responses to Oil Spills

  • Steven A. MurawskiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter considers a series of research, technology, policy, and human resource-relevant recommendations aimed at identifying ultra-deep wellsite locations that may be problematic for risk of an oil spill, as well as enhancing prevention, preparedness, response, and subsequent injury assessment associated with ultra-deep oil spills. While various groups have offered research and process improvement recommendations, numbering in the high hundreds, this chapter focuses on 20 key research gaps and 4 policy changes that would improve outcomes for ultra-deep oil spill prevention and response. Recommended policy changes include (1) inclusion of site-specific risk assessments as an element of lease sale identification and approval, (2) collection of environmental baselines (both broadscale and installation-specific) and ongoing monitoring of oil contaminants, (3) improved transparency and data sharing for oil facility management and accidental releases, and (4) more formal international engagement in siting, oil spill preparedness, response, and impact assessment.

Keywords

Science priorities oil spills Ultra-deep oil spills Oil spill response Deep-sea oil policy Law of the Sea Oil spill baselines 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The priority recommendations contained herein were culled from the literally hundreds similar recommendations offered by the Federal agencies, industry groups, NGOs, and academic researchers and in various after-action reports stemming from oil spills. In particular, these perspectives benefitted from discussions with oil spill experts including David Westerholm and Lisa DiPinto at NOAA and Robyn Conmy at EPA. Likewise, discussions with many colleagues in the industry were helpful in winnowing the list to include the most feasible options. Last, my colleagues at C-IMAGE were instrumental in articulating many of the research priorities. That being said, the responsibility for including specific recommendations as part of this chapter lies only with me.

References

  1. Alaska Fisheries Science Center and Alaska Regional Office (2018) North Pacific Observer Program 2017 Annual Report. AFSC Processed Rep. 2018–02, 136 pp. Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle WA 98115. Available at http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/Publications/ProcRpt/PR2018-02.pdf
  2. Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) (2010) Response to the Montara wellhead platform incident. Report of the incident analysis team. March 2010. Available online from: https://www.amsa.gov.au/marine-environment/incidents-and-exercises/response-montara-wellhead-platform-incident
  3. Berenshtein I, Perlin N, Ainsworth C, Ortega-Ortiz J, Vaz AC, Paris CB (2020) Comparison of the spatial extent, impacts to shorelines and ecosystem, and 4-dimensional characteristics of simulated oil Spills (Chap. 20). In: Murawski SA, Ainsworth C, Gilbert S, Hollander D, Paris CB, Schlüter M, Wetzel D (eds) Scenarios and responses to future Deep Oil Spills – fighting the next war. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  4. Boebert E, Blossom JM (2016) Deepwater Horizon: a systems analysis of the Macondo disaster. Harvard University Press. 290 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Chancellor E, Murawski SA, Paris CB, Perruso L, Perlin N (2020) Comparative environmental sensitivity of offshore Gulf of Mexico waters potentially impacted by ultra-deep oil well blowouts (Chap. 26). In: Murawski SA, Ainsworth C, Gilbert S, Hollander D, Paris CB, Schlüter M, Wetzel D (eds) Scenarios and responses to future Deep Oil Spills – fighting the next war. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  6. Demopoulos AWJ, Bourque JR, Cordes E, Stamler KM (2015) Impacts of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on deep-sea coral-associated sediment communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 561:51–68.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisher CR, Montagna PA, Sutton TT (2016) How did the Deepwater Horizon oil spill impact deep-sea ecosystems? Oceanography 29:182–195.  https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2016.82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. French-McCay D, Crowley D, Rowe JJ, Bock M, Robinson H, Wenning R, Hayward Walker A, Joeckel J, Nedwed TJ, Parkerton TF (2018) Comparative risk assessment of spill response options for a deepwater oil well blowout: part 1. Oil spill modeling. Mar Pollut Bull 133:1001–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Iledare OO, Pulsipher AG, Dismukes DE, Mesyanzhinovet D (1997) Oil spills, workplace safety and firm size: evidence from the U.S. Gulf of Mexico OCS. Energy J 18:73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Interagency Coordinating Committee on Oil Pollution Research (ICCOPR) (2015) Oil pollution research and technology plan: Fiscal years 2015–2021. 270 pp. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee_prod.opengov.ibmcloud.com/files/bsee-interim-document/statistics/2015-iccopr-research-and-technology-plan.pdf
  11. Jablonowski CJ (2007) Employing detection controlled models in health and environmental risk assessment: a case in offshore oil drilling. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 13:986–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ji Z-G, Johnson WR, DuFore CM (2017) Oil-spill risk analysis Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) lease sales, Eastern Planning Area, Central Planning Area, and Western Planning Area, 2017–2022, and Gulf-wide OCS program, 2017–2086. OCS Report BOEM 2017–010. 57 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Johansen Ø, Rye H (2003) DeepSpill––Field study of a simulated oil and gas blowout in deep water. Spill Sci Technol Bull 8:433–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Joint Analysis Group, Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill (JAG) (2011) Review of R/V Brooks McCall data to examine subsurface oil. NOAA Technical Report NOS OR&R 24, Silver Spring, MD 69 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Lubchenco J, McNutt MK, Dreyfus G, Murawski SA, Kennedy DM, Anastas PT, Chu S, Hunter T (2012) Science in support of the Deepwater Horizon response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:20212–20221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malone K, Pesch S, Schlüter M, Krause D (2018) Oil droplet size distributions in deep-sea blowouts: influence of pressure and dissolved gases. Environ Sci Technol 52:6326–6333.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Malone K, Aman ZM, Pesch S, Schlüter M, Krause D (2020) Jet formation at the spill site and resulting droplet size distributions (Chap. 4). In: Murawski SA, Ainsworth C, Gilbert S, Hollander D, Paris CB, Schlüter M, Wetzel D (eds) Deep Oil Spills: facts, fate and effects. Springer International, ChamGoogle Scholar
  18. Mark-Moser M, Disenhof C, Rose K (2015) Gulf of Mexico geology and petroleum system: overview and literature review in support of risk and resource assessments. NETL-TRS-4-2015; EPAct Technical Report Series; U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory: Morgantown, WV; p 28Google Scholar
  19. McEachran JD (2009) Fishes (Vertebrata: Pisces) of the Gulf of Mexico. In: Felder DL, Camp DK (eds) Gulf of Mexico–origins, waters, and biota, vol 1.: Biodiversity. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, pp 1223–1316Google Scholar
  20. McGowan CJ, Kwok RK, Engel LS, Stenzel MR, Stewart PA, Sandler DP (2017) Respiratory, dermal, and eye irritation symptoms associated with Corexit™ EC9527A/EC9500A following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: findings from the GuLF STUDY. Environ Health Perspect 097015:1–7. https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/pdf/10.1289/EHP1677Google Scholar
  21. McNutt MK, Chu S, Lubchenco J, Hunter T, Dreyfus G, Murawski SA, Kennedy DM (2012) Applications of science and engineering to quantify and control the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:20222–20228.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214389109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muehlenbachs L, Cohen MA, Gerarden T (2013) The impact of water depth on safety and environmental performance in offshore oil and gas production. Energy Policy 55:699–705.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murawski SA, Hollander DJ, Gilbert S, Gracia A (2020) Deep-water oil and gas production in the Gulf of Mexico, and related global trends (Chap. 2). In: Murawski SA, Ainsworth C, Gilbert S, Hollander D, Paris CB, Schlüter M, Wetzel D (eds) Scenarios and responses to future Deep Oil Spills – fighting the next war. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  24. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) (2019) Report of the committee on evaluation of the use of chemical dispersants in Oil Spill response. National Academies Press, Washington DC. xxx ppGoogle Scholar
  25. National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council (NAE-NRC) (2012) Macondo Well Deepwater Horizon Blowout: lessons for improving offshore drilling safety. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.  https://doi.org/10.17226/13273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling (2011) Deep water: the Gulf oil disaster and the future of offshore drilling. Report to the President. 398 pp. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-OILCOMMISSION/pdf/GPO-OILCOMMISSION.pdf
  27. National Incident Command (NIC) (2010) National incident commander’s report: MC252 Deepwater Horizon. National incident command, Deepwater Horizon response. https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=767583
  28. National Research Council (NRC) (2003) Oil in the sea III: fates and effects. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. National Research Council (NRC) (2005) Oil spill dispersants: efficacy and effects. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, p 377Google Scholar
  30. Paris CB, Trillo ML, Olascoaga MJ, Aman ZM, Schlüter M, Joye SB, Berenshtein I (2018) BP Gulf science data reveals ineffectual sub-sea dispersant injection for the Macondo blowout. Front Mar Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  31. Pesch S, Jaeger P, Jaggi A, Malone K, Hoffmann M, Krause D, Oldenburg T, Schlüter M (2018) Rise velocity of live-oil droplets in deep-sea oil spills. Environ Eng Sci. 35(4):289–299  https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2017.0319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pesch S, Schlüter M, Aman Z, Malone K, Krause D, Paris CB (2020) Behavior of rising droplets and bubbles – impact on the physics of deep-sea blowouts and oil fate (Chap. 5). In: Murawski SA, Ainsworth C, Gilbert S, Hollander D, Paris CB, Schlüter M, Wetzel D (eds) Deep Oil Spills: facts, fate and effects. Springer International, ChamGoogle Scholar
  33. Peterson CH, Rice SD, Short JW, Esler D, Bodkin JL, Ballachey BE, Irons DB (2003) Long-term ecosystem response to the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Science 302:2082–2086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) (2018) 2019–2024 National outer continental shelf oil and gas leasing draft proposed program. Available at: https://www.boem.gov/NP-Draft-Proposed-Program-2019-2024 380 pp
  35. Sauer TC, Costa HJ, Brown JS, Ward TJ (1997) Toxicity identification evaluations of produced water effluents. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:2020–2028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shultz J (1999) The risk of accidents and spills at offshore production platforms: a statistical analysis of risk factors and the development of predictive models. Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  37. Soto LA, Botello AV, Licea-Durán S, Lizárraga-Partida M, Yáñez-Arancibia Y (2014) The environmental legacy of the Ixtoc 1 oil spill in Campeche sound, southwestern Gulf of Mexico. Front Mar Sci 1:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sutton TT, Frank T, Judkins H, Romero IC (2020) As Gulf oil extraction goes deeper, who is at risk? Community structure, distribution, and connectivity of the deep-pelagic fauna (Chap. 24). In: Murawski SA, Ainsworth C, Gilbert S, Hollander D, Paris CB, Schlüter M, Wetzel D (eds) Scenarios and responses to future Deep Oil Spills – fighting the next war. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  39. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) (2017a) Gulf of Mexico OCS Lease Sale. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement 2018. Volume I: Chapters 1–8 and keyword Index. https://www.boem.gov/BOEM-EIS-2017-074-v1/ 412 pp. 4–123 etc.
  40. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) (2017b) Assessment of technically and economically recoverable hydrocarbon resources of the Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf as of January 1, 2014. OCS Report BOEM 2017–005. 44 pp. https://www.boem.gov/BOEM-2017-005/
  41. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2017) Final National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit No. GEG460000 for Offshore Oil and Gas Activities in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico. Region 4 PermitGoogle Scholar
  42. Varanasi U (2013) Making science useful in complex political and legal arenas: a case for frontloading science in anticipation of environmental changes to support natural resource laws and policies. Wash J Environ Law Policy 2013:238–265Google Scholar
  43. Zhao L, Chen Z, Lee K (2008) A risk assessment model for produced water discharge from offshore petroleum platforms – development and validation. Mar Pollut Bull 56:1890–1897CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of South Florida, College of Marine ScienceSt. PetersburgUSA

Personalised recommendations