Moisture Climate Monitoring in Confined Spaces Using Percolation Sensors

  • Helge PfeifferEmail author
  • Charlotte Van Steen
  • Els Verstrynge
  • Martine Wevers
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 962)


It is a well-known fact that inappropriate levels of moisture can harm different kinds of structures, especially also in cultural heritage. This does not only regard hygroscopic materials but all assemblies where small quantities of water can change the physical properties of materials and structures. Damage modes range from crack formation due to swelling pressure, migration of harmful agents such as salts, up to corrosion and microbial damage. A specific concern is not only a certain moisture level as such, but also the periodic moisture variations as they can even be related to mechanical fatigue processes when alternating hydration pressures apply. Therefore, moisture monitoring is in many cases unavoidable and a multitude of commercial and experimental set-ups exist ranging from simple point measurements using hygrometers up to sophisticated time-domain reflectometry that provides humidity profiles at long ranges.

Inspired by an analogous problem in aircraft structures suffering e.g. from moisture ingress in floor structures, a sensing material to detect the moisture climate was developed that is based on the percolation effect. Here, an electrical conductive material is changing into an isolator when a certain humidity level is reached. The material presented is based on hygroscopic poly-vinyl alcohol and electrically conductive titanium carbonitrides. The resulting material shows a characteristic change of the resistance over many orders of magnitude when a humidity level of 80% is reached which can be fine-tuned depending on the actual application. The sensing material is then applied on a cable with a small diameter and in this way, a versatile sensor that can be used especially in confined spaces is obtained. Data transmission can start with simple read-out by a multimeter, but also a network of wireless nodes were tested as well as RFID technology.

The developed sensor PercoSens® is for the moment being applied in chemical installations and on an experimental level also in concrete structures enabling extended sensing ranges and a high independency on interfering with environmental parameters. Very recent tests showed the potential of this sensor to indicate water ingress in damaged building structures. For the latter, a sensor was embedded in concrete and after imitated crack formation, the subsequent water ingress was determined quickly.


Moisture Monitoring Water damage Percolation sensors 



Part of the research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007–2013] under grant agreement n°212912 “AISHA II”. We thank Jurgen Perremans for performing the tests and Johan Vanhulst for the technical assistance and design of the measuring set-up.


  1. 1.
    Rosina, E., Sansonetti, A., Ludwig, N.: Moisture: the problem that any conservator faced in his professional life. J. Cult. Heritage 31, S1–S2 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Essam, J.W.: Percolation theory. Rep. Prog. Phys. 43(7), 833–912 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pfeiffer, H., et al.: Structural health monitoring using percolation sensors – new user cases from operational airliners and chemical plants. In: International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. DesTech, Stanford (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leneveu, D.M., Rand, R.P., Parsegian, V.A.: Measurement of forces between lecithin bilayers. Nature 259(5544), 601–603 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pfeiffer, H., et al.: Liquid detection in confined aircraft structures based on lyotropic percolation thresholds. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 161(1), 791–798 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Camuffo, D.: Standardization activity in the evaluation of moisture content. J. Cult. Heritage 31, S10–S14 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Senni, L., et al.: A portable NMR sensor for moisture monitoring of wooden works of art, particularly of paintings on wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 43(1), 167–180 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D’Ayala, D., Aktas, Y.D.: Moisture dynamics in the masonry fabric of historic buildings subjected to wind-driven rain and flooding. Build. Environ. 104, 208–220 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vecchiattini, R.: Moisture monitoring experience in the old town of Genoa (Italy). J. Cult. Heritage 31, S71–S81 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Erkal, A., D’Ayala, D., Stephenson, V.: Evaluation of environmental impact on historical stone masonry through on-site monitoring appraisal. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 46, 2012-060 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frick, J., et al.: Moisture monitoring during an artificial weathering test of a cultural heritage compatible insulation plaster. In: 2016 19th World Conference on Non-destructive Testing (2016). Munich: ndt.netGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arakistain, I., Miguel Abascal, J., Munne, O.: Wireless sensor network technology for moisture monitoring of wood (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pfeiffer, H., et al.: Liquid detection in confined aircraft structures based on lyotropic percolation thresholds. Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. Sens. Mater. 161, 791–798 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pfeiffer, H.: Structural health monitoring makes sense. LHT Connection - The Lufthansa Technik Group Magazine (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pfeiffer, H., et al.: Leakage monitoring using percolation sensors for revealing structural damage in engineering structures. Struct. Control Health Monitor. 21(6), 1030–1042 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials EngineeringKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations