Skip to main content

ERCP-Related Perforations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dilemmas in ERCP

Abstract

Iatrogenic perforations related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are an uncommon adverse event, occurring in 0.14–1.3% of cases, and are associated with a mortality of up to 8%. The most widely utilized classification system was proposed by Stapfer et al. and characterizes perforations based on mechanism and location. Type I perforations occur on the lateral duodenal wall secondary to endoscope trauma, type II are sphincterotomy-related, type III are perforations of the bile duct or pancreatic duct with endoscopic tools, and type IV are miniscule and identified with free air on fluoroscopic imaging. Studies utilizing this classification system demonstrate that patients with type III and IV perforations do well with conservative management alone, whereas patients with type I and II perforations frequently require surgical management and are more likely to have poor outcomes. There remain many unanswered questions pertaining to the exact role of surgical, endoscopic, and medical therapy, especially in patients with type I, II, and III perforations. In this chapter we will focus on perforation related to ERCP, outlining a diagnostic and management strategy as it pertains to classification, and emphasize a management algorithm that can be used to better approach this serious adverse event.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cotton PB, et al. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70(1):80–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Katsinelos P, et al. Impact of periampullary diverticula on the outcome and fluoroscopy time in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013;12(4):408–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Panteris V, et al. Influence of juxtapapillary diverticula on the success or difficulty of cannulation and complication rate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68(5):903–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tyagi P, et al. Periampullary diverticula and technical success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(6):1342–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karaahmet F, Kekilli M. The presence of periampullary diverticulum increased the complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30:1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baillie J. Difficult biliary access for ERCP. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2012;14(6):542–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman ML, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(13):909–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Testoni PA, et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy. 2016;48(7):657–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Enns R, et al. ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management. Endoscopy. 2002;34(4):293–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stapfer M, et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg. 2000;232(2):191–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumbhari V, et al. Algorithm for the management of ERCP-related perforations. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(5):934–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bill JG, et al. The importance of early recognition in management of ERCP-related perforations. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:4841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin YJ, et al. Clinical course and proposed treatment strategy for ERCP-related duodenal perforation: a multicenter analysis. Endoscopy. 2013;45(10):806–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. La Torre M, et al. Promptness of diagnosis is the main prognostic factor after colonoscopic perforation. Color Dis. 2012;14(1):e23–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruiz-Tovar J, et al. Case series: pneumoretroperitoneum secondary to duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Can J Surg. 2009;52(1):68–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Baron TH, et al. A comprehensive approach to the management of acute endoscopic perforations (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76(4):838–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hyun JJ. Endoscopic Suturing of a large type I duodenal perforation. VideoGIE. 2018;17;4(2):78–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baron TH, et al. Use of an over-the-scope clipping device: multicenter retrospective results of the first U.S. experience (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76(1):202–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cirocchi R, et al. A systematic review of the management and outcome of ERCP related duodenal perforations using a standardized classification system. Surgeon. 2017;15(6):379–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tringali A, et al. Type II-III ERCP-related perforations treated with temporary fully covered self-expandable stents. Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49(10):1169–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Howard TJ, et al. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery. 1999;126(4):658–63; discussion 664-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Machado NO. Management of duodenal perforation post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the outcome? A review article. JOP. 2012;13(1):18–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir M. Kushnir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bill, J.G., Kushnir, V.M. (2019). ERCP-Related Perforations. In: Mullady, D. (eds) Dilemmas in ERCP. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12741-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12741-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12740-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12741-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics