Advertisement

Applying Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence to Digital Health

  • Dragos IlincaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)

Abstract

During recent years, healthcare informatics has become synonymous with big data and interoperability challenges. Skilled digital health entrepreneurs, however, can turn these issues into profitable opportunities for unlocking greater value out of healthcare and adjacent industries, including pharma or insurance. Recent technology breakthroughs such as blockchain and artificial intelligence hold great promise in helping entrepreneurs tackle major healthcare challenges, such as breaking data out of silos while keeping it secure, moving data quickly through the whole value stream, and analyzing and getting insights out of huge data sets quickly and reliably. This chapter provides a brief introduction to how both blockchain and artificial intelligence work, some key use cases in healthcare where they can be leveraged, as well as critical challenges that must be overcome for the technologies to be adopted and deployed at scale.

Keywords

Blockchain Artificial intelligence Deep learning Machine learning Encryption Decentralized consensus Ethereum Hyperledger Electronic medical records EMR Pharma Insurance Health information exchange IoT Pharmacogenomics Robotics Precision medicine 

References

  1. 1.
    Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Szabo N. Smart contracts: building blocks for digital markets. EXTROPY: The Journal of Transhumanist Thought. 1996;16.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deloitte US. Blockchain: opportunities for health care a new model for health information exchanges. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/public-sector/articles/blockchain-opportunities-for-health-care.html. Accessed Aug 2018.
  4. 4.
    Protenus. 2017 breach barometer annual report. https://www.protenus.com/2017-breach-barometer-annual-report. Accessed Aug 2018.
  5. 5.
    HIPAAJournal. At least 3.14 million healthcare records were exposed in Q2. 2018. https://www.hipaajournal.com/q2-2018-healthcare-data-breach-report/. Accessed Aug 2018.
  6. 6.
    Ekblaw A. et al. A case study for blockchain in healthcare: “MedRec” prototype for electronic health records and medical research data. https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/5-56-onc_blockchainchallenge_mitwhitepaper.pdf. Accessed Aug 2018.
  7. 7.
    Halamka JD. The potential for blockchain to transform electronic health records. Harv Bus Rev. 2018. https://hbr.org/2017/03/the-potential-for-blockchain-to-transform-electronic-health-records. Accessed Aug 2018.
  8. 8.
    Schumacher A. Blockchain & Healthcare Strategy Guide 2017: Reinventing healthcare: towards a global, blockchain-based precision medicine ecosystem. (Kindle Locations 502–507).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cockburn R, Newton PN, Agyarko EK, Akunyili D, White NJ. The global threat of counterfeit drugs: why industry and governments must communicate the dangers. PLoS Med. 2005;2(4):e100.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Swedish J. Anthem was the victim of a sophisticated cyber attack—important message from Joseph Swedish, President and CEO. https://www11.anthem.com/ca/provider/f1/s0/t0/pw_e230409.pdf. Accessed Aug 2018.
  11. 11.
    IOTA. UNOPS and IOTA collaborate to bring transparency and efficiency to UN work. 2018. https://blog.iota.org/unops-and-iota-collaborate-to-bring-transparency-and-efficiency-to-un-work-e953f7736c88. Accessed Aug 2018.
  12. 12.
    Consensys. The state of the ethereum network. 2018. https://media.consensys.net/the-state-of-the-ethereum-network-949332cb6895. Accessed Aug 2018.
  13. 13.
    Russell S, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1995. p. 4182.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shortliffe EH. A rule-based computer program for advising physicians regarding antimicrobial therapy selection. In: Proceedings of the 1974 annual ACM conference. Vol. 2. ACM; 1974.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alexander AG, Ballou KA. Work life balance, burnout, and the electronic health record. Am J Med. 2018;131(8):857–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arndt BG, Beasley JW, Watkinson MD, et al. Tethered to the EHR: primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15:402–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dean JC, Ilvento CC. Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(1):20–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goh GB, Hodas NO, Vishnu A. Deep learning for computational chemistry. J Comput Chem. 2017;38:1291–307.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24764.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramsundar B, et al. Is multitask deep learning practical for pharma? J Chem Inf Model. 2017;57(8):2068–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Min X, Zeng WW, Chen N, Chen T, Jiang R. Chromatin accessibility prediction via convolutional long short-term memory networks with k-mer embedding. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2017;33(14):I92–I101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Estey EP. Robotic prostatectomy: the new standard of care or a marketing success? Can Urol Assoc J. 2009;3(6):488–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Motivating influences for patients seeking consultation for robotic prostatectomy. In: Paper presented at the 24th WCE world congress endourology; August 17–20; Cleveland, OH; 2006.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moustris GP, Hiridis SC, Deliparaschos KM, Konstantinidis KM. Evolution of autonomous and semi-autonomous robotic surgical systems: a review of the literature. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7:375–92.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carlsson G, Campion FX. Machine intelligence for healthcare; 2017. Self published. ISBN 9781542924948.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gagliardi F. Instance-based classifiers applied to medical databases: diagnosis and knowledge extraction. Artif Intell Med. 2011;52(3):123–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2011.04.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu Qi, Vasarhelyi M. Healthcare fraud detection: a survey and a clustering model incorporating Geo-location information. In: 29th world continuous auditing and reporting symposium (29WCARS), Brisbane, Australia. 2013.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    McCulloch W, Pitts W. A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys. 1943;5(4):115–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ravì D, et al. Deep learning for health informatics. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017;21(1):4–21.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2016.2636665.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhen X, Wang Z, Islam A, Bhaduri M, Chan I, Li S. Multi-scale deep networks and regression forests for direct bi-ventricular volume estimation. Med Image Anal. 2016;30:120–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brosch T et al. Manifold learning of brain mris by deep learning, In: Proc MICCAI; 2013. p. 633–640.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kondo T, Ueno J, Takao S. Medical image recognition of abdominal multi-organs by hybrid multi-layered GMDH-type neural network using principal component-regression analysis. In: Proc 2nd Int Symp Comput Netw; 2014, p. 157–163.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kondo T, Ueno J, Takao S. Medical image diagnosis of lung cancer by deep feedback GMDH-type neural network. Robot Netw Artif Life. 2016;2(4):252–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rose DC, Arel I, Karnowski TP, Paquit VC. Applying deeplayered clustering to mammography image analytics. In: Proceedings of the Biomedical Sciences and Engineering Conference; 2010. p. 1–4.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kadurin A, Nikolenko S, Khrabrov K, Aliper A, Zhavoronkov A. druGAN: an advanced generative adversarial autoencoder model for de novo generation of new molecules with desired molecular properties in silico. Mol Pharm. 2017;14(9):3098–104.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00346.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Blaschke T, Olivecrona M, Engkvist O, Bajorath J, Chen H. Application of generative autoencoder in de novo molecular design. Mol Inform. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.201700123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gawehn E, Hiss JA, Schneider G. Deep learning in drug discovery. Mol Inf. 2016;35:3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.201501008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang S, et al. A deep learning framework for modeling structural features of rna-binding protein targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(4):e32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Angermueller C, Lee H, Reik W, Stegle O. Accurate prediction of single-cell dna methylation states using deep learning. bioRxiv. 2016. 055715.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Alvin R, Eyal O, et al. Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records. npj Digit Med. 2018;1:18.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Albert H. Corinna Fukushima Automatic Documentation of ICD Codes with Far-Field Speech Recognition, arXiv.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hossain MS. Patient state recognition system for healthcare using speech and facial expressions. J Med Syst. 2016;40:272.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0627-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zeng M. et al. Convolutional Neural Networks for human activity recognition using mobile sensors. In: 6th international conference on mobile computing, applications and services, Austin, TX; 2014. p. 197–205.  https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.mobicase.2014.257786.
  43. 43.
    Zou B, Lampos V, Gorton R, Cox IJ. On infectious intestinal disease surveillance using social media content. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Digital Health Conference; 2016. p. 157–61.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Martis RJ, Rajendra Acharya U, Mandana KM, Ray AK, Chakraborty C. Application of principal component analysis to ECG signals for automated diagnosis of cardiac health. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39(14):11792–800.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gao H, Cai JF, Shen Z, Zhao H. Robust principal component analysis-based four-dimensional computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(11):3181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Khedher L, Ramírez J, Górriz JM, Brahim A, Segovia F, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease based on partial least squares, principal component analysis and support vector machine using segmented MRI images. Neurocomputing. 2015;151:139–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RXB Healthcare TechnologiesVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations