Abstract
Decomposition methods have been considered for dealing with many-objective problems, since the Pareto-dominance selection was found to become ineffective as the number of objectives grow beyond four. As decomposition methods change the multiobjective problem into a set of single-objective problems, the difficulties found by evolutionary algorithms in many-objective optimization were expected to become alleviated. This paper studies the convergence properties of two decomposition schemes, respectively based on Euclidean norm and on Tchebyschev norm, in many-objective optimization. Numerical experiments show that the solution sequences obtained from Tchebyschev norm decomposition becomes stuck at a finite distance from the Pareto-set, while the sequences obtained from Euclidean norm decomposition may be adjusted such that an asymptotic convergence is achieved. Explanations for those different convergence behaviors are obtained from recently developed analytical tools.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J.: An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization. Evol. Comput. 7(3), 205–230 (1995)
Hanne, T.: Global multiobjective optimization with evolutionary algorithms: selection mechanisms and mutation control. In: Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Deb, K., Coello Coello, C.A., Corne, D. (eds.) EMO 2001. LNCS, vol. 1993, pp. 197–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44719-9_14
Ikeda, K., Kita, H., Kobayashi, S.: Failure of Pareto-based MOEAs: does non-dominated really mean near to optimal? In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2001), pp. 957–962 (2001)
Khare, V., Yao, X., Deb, K.: Performance scaling of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. In: Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J., Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Deb, K. (eds.) EMO 2003. LNCS, vol. 2632, pp. 376–390. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36970-8_27
Li, B., Li, J., Tang, K., Yao, X.: Many-objective evolutionary algorithms: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 48(1), Article 13 (2015)
Purshouse, R.C., Fleming, P.J.: On the evolutionary optimization of many conflicting objectives. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11(6), 770–784 (2007)
Santos, T., Takahashi, R.H.C.: On the performance degradation of dominance-based evolutionary algorithms in many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 22, 19–31 (2018)
Zhang, Q., Li, H.: MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11(6), 712–731 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Takahashi, R.H.C. (2019). On the Convergence of Decomposition Algorithms in Many-Objective Problems. In: Deb, K., et al. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11411. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12598-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12598-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12597-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12598-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)