Skip to main content

Attitudinal and Organisational Barriers to the Introduction of Long-Stay Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Long-Term Forensic Psychiatric Care
  • 665 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents and discusses findings from interviews and focus groups with staff working in the field of forensic psychiatry. It identifies some changes happening in service provision for ‘long-stay’ patients, although the extent of formalisation and codification in relation to these new ways of working have been, at best, patchy. Implementing change in organisations is a difficult process. Embedding and sustaining change so that it becomes institutionalised requires a great deal of effort. The chapter uses ‘institutional theory’ to examine change and barriers to change in the field of forensic psychiatry. Institutional theory is concerned with understanding how the routines, norms and actions become established and taken for granted (i.e. institutionalised) by those who work in organisations, as well as in the wider field in which they are situated. A number of barriers to more extensive and formalised change are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Scott WR. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scott WR. Conceptualizing organizational fields: linking organizations and societal systems. In: Derlien H, Gerhardt U, Scharpf FW, editors. Systemrationalitat und Partialinteresse. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaf; 1994. p. 203–21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lawrence TB, Suddaby R. Institutions and institutional work. In: Clegg S, Hardy C, Lawrence T, Nord W, editors. The SAGE handbook of organization studies. London: SAGE; 2006. p. 215–53.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Pilgrim D. Inside Ashworth. Oxford: Radcliffe; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shepherd J, Boardman J, Slade M. Making recovery a reality. London: The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coid J, Maden T. Should psychiatrists protect the public? BMJ. 2003;326:406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reay T, Hinings CR. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organ Stud. 2009;30(6):629–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Harty MA, Shaw J, Thomas S, Dolan M, Davies L, Thornicroft G, Carlisle J, Moreno M, Leese M, Appleby L, Jones P. The security, clinical and social needs of patients in high security psychiatric hospitals in England. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2004;15:208–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Uslu M, Mok M. Longstay in the Netherlands documentary, 2009. http://lfpc-cost.eu/tag/long-term-forensic-psychiatric-care-2/. Accessed 12 Aug 2016.

  10. Scales K. Doing what makes sense: locating knowledge about person-centred care in the everyday logics of long-term care, PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martin JP. Hospitals in trouble. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Salize HJ, Dressing H. Placement and treatment of mentally-ill offenders - legislation and practice in member states, European Commission, Central Institute of Mental Health, Final Report February 15, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Department of Health. The NHS plan. London: Department of Health; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Turner T, Salter T. Forensic psychiatry and general psychiatry: reexamining the relationship. Br Psychol Bull. 2008;32:2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Centre for Workforce Intelligence. Medical specialty workforce factsheet. London: CWI; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Völlm B, Edworthy R, Holley J, Talbot E, Majid S, Duggan C, Weaver T, McDonald R. Characteristics and needs of long-stay patients in high and medium secure settings in The UK: implications for service organisation. Health Serv Delivery Res. 2017;5:11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Currie G, Lockett A, Finn R, Martin G, Waring J. Institutional work to maintain professional power: recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organ Stud. 2012;33:937–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclaimer

This work represents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by the author in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HS&DR programme or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth McDonald .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McDonald, R. (2019). Attitudinal and Organisational Barriers to the Introduction of Long-Stay Services. In: Völlm, B., Braun, P. (eds) Long-Term Forensic Psychiatric Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12594-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12594-3_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12593-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12594-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics