Skip to main content

“Do No Harm” in the Age of Big Data: Data, Ethics, and the Refugees

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Guide to Mobile Data Analytics in Refugee Scenarios

Abstract

Leveraging call detail records for humanitarian analysis involves the collection and sharing of a large set of behavioral data, from hundreds of thousands of people. There is a risk that such data could be misused for surveillance and suppression, and there are strong criticisms that have been leveled at efforts involving call detail records. The D4R Challenge is not immune to these criticisms, and during the design and implementation of the challenge, these issues were discussed at length. This chapter outlines these issues and how they were (imperfectly) addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As mentioned in Chap. 1, while Turkey is party to the 1951 Geneva Refugee Convention, it does not grant Syrian refugees the legal status of “refugee,” but considers them “temporarily protected foreign individuals”. This complicates the rights Syrian refugees have from a legal point of view, where they cannot benefit from the internationally established measures of protection. See Chap. 6 for definitions of the key terms.

  2. 2.

    www.palantir.com.

  3. 3.

    See Chap. 1 of this volume.

  4. 4.

    https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/data-protection-eu_en.

  5. 5.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/03/technology/yahoo-hack-3-billion-users.html.

  6. 6.

    https://www.ftc.gov/equifax-data-breach.

  7. 7.

    https://www.digitalglobe.com/ecosystem/open-data.

  8. 8.

    https://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/nuremberg.pdf.

  9. 9.

    https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/.

  10. 10.

    https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/.

  11. 11.

    https://www.dhs.gov/publication/menlo-report.

References

  1. Brusoni S, Vaccaro A (2017) Ethics, technology and organizational innovation. J Bus Ethics 143(2):223–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. CHS (2014) The core humanitarian standard on quality and accountability. CHS Alliance, Group URD and the Sphere Project

    Google Scholar 

  3. Couldry N (2017) Surveillance-democracy. J Inf Technol Polit 14(2):182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crawford K, Schultz J (2014) Big data and due process: toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. BCL Rev 55:93

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cukier K, Mayer-Schoenberger V (2013) The rise of big data: how it’s changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Aff 92:28

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobsen KL (2015) Humanitarian technology: revisiting the do no harm debate. ODI humanitarian practice network. https://odihpn.org/blog/humanitarian-technology-revisiting-the-%C2%91do-no-harm%C2%92-debate/

  7. Jones P (2017) Human rights, group rights, and peoples’ rights. In: Human rights. Routledge, pp 277–304

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kammourieh L, Baar T, Berens J, Letouzé E, Manske J, Palmer J, Sangokoya D, Vinck P (2017) Group privacy in the age of big data. In: Group privacy. Springer, pp 37–66

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kemp S (2017) Digital in 2017 global overview report. We are social and hootsuite. https://wearesocial.com/special-reports/digital-in-2017-global-overview/

  10. Kitchin R (2014) The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kosciejew M (2014) Proposing a charter of personal data rights. Inf Manag J 48(3):27–32

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kranzberg M (1986) Technology and history: “Kranzberg’s laws”. Technol Cult 27(3):544–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Latonero M, Gold Z (2015) Data, human rights & human security. Hum Rights Hum Secur

    Google Scholar 

  14. Letouzé E, Vinck P, Kammourieh L (2015) The law, politics and ethics of cell phone data analytics. Data-pop alliance white paper series data-pop alliance, World Bank Group, Harvard humanitarian initiative, MIT Media Lab and Overseas Development Institute

    Google Scholar 

  15. Levitt SD, List JA (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? J Econ Perspect 21(2):153–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mancini F, Letouze EF, Meier P, Vinck P, Musila GM, Muggah R, Diniz G, Puig Larrauri H, Matveeva A, O’Reilly M (2013) New technology and the prevention of violence and conflict. United States Institute of Peace

    Google Scholar 

  17. McDonald SM (2016) Ebola: a big data disaster-privacy, property, and the law of disaster experimentation. The Centre for Internet and Society

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meier P (2011) New information technologies and their impact on the humanitarian sector. Int Rev Red Cross 93(884):1239–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Neil C (2017) Weapons of math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Broadway Books

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parker B (2019) New UN deal with data mining firm Palantir raises protection concerns. The new humanitarian. http://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/news/2019/02/05/un-palantir-deal-data-mining-protection-concerns-wfp/

  21. Parks L (2009) Digging into Google earth: an analysis of “crisis in Darfur”. Geoforum 40(4):535–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pham PN, Vinck P (2012) Technology, conflict early warning systems, public health, and human rights. Health Hum Rights 14(2):106–117

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Simon & Schuster International

    Google Scholar 

  24. Salah AA, Pentland A, Lepri B, Letouzé E, Vinck P, de Montjoye YA, Dong X, Dağdelen Ö (2018) Data for refugees: the D4R challenge on mobility of Syrian refugees in Turkey. arXiv preprint arXiv:180700523

  25. Sandvik K, Raymond N (2017) Beyond the protective effect: towards a theory of harm for information communication technologies in mass atrocity response. Genocide Stud Prev Int J 11(1)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Scheuerman WE (2014) Whistleblowing as civil disobedience: the case of Edward Snowden. Philos Social Crit 40(7):609–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith B (2017) The need for a digital Geneva convention. The official Microsoft blog, 14

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sphere (2018) The sphere handbook: humanitarian charter and minimum standards in humanitarian response, 4th edn. Practical Action Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor L (2016) No place to hide? The ethics and analytics of tracking mobility using mobile phone data. Environ Plann D Soc Space 34(2):319–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor L, Broeders D (2015) In the name of development: power, profit and the datafication of the global south. Geoforum 64:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. de Terwangne C (2014) The right to be forgotten and informational autonomy in the digital environment. In: The ethics of memory in a digital age. Springer, pp 82–101

    Google Scholar 

  32. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (1978) The national commission for the protection of human subjects of biomedical and behavioral research, The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Department of health, education, and welfare, U.S

    Google Scholar 

  33. Van Dijck J (2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveill Soc 12(2):197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Voigt P, von dem Bussche A (2017) The EU general data protection regulation (GDPR). A practical guide, 1st edn. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Ali Salah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vinck, P., Pham, P.N., Salah, A.A. (2019). “Do No Harm” in the Age of Big Data: Data, Ethics, and the Refugees. In: Salah, A., Pentland, A., Lepri, B., Letouzé, E. (eds) Guide to Mobile Data Analytics in Refugee Scenarios. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12554-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12554-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12553-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12554-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics