The Seventh Continent: Taking Care and Making Family

  • Naomi HodgsonEmail author
  • Stefan Ramaekers


This chapter presents the first of three film analyses, and focuses on The Seventh Continent. After setting out the events of the film, we turn to existing film theory literature to show how the film has been understood previously, which tends particularly toward reading it in psychological terms in light of its tragic ending. In contrast, we offer a reading that is led by the film’s own devices—the repetition of the same activities, prolonged close-ups, and the use of diegetic sounds. These, we suggest, invite a different stance towards it than the critical approach, which seeks explanation and deeper meaning. By focusing only on what is seen and heard through the film’s devices we argue that the film brings into view that raising children is always about inheritance and thus involves forms of taking care of things in the world and of one another, showing and maintaining these forms of care, and passing on these and the objects concerned in it. Furthermore, it shows that the maintenance of community entails the willingness to do these things, time and again.


The Seventh Continent Devices Uncanny Candidness Force Close-up Diegetic sound Connection Community Responsibility 


  1. Cavell, S. (1979a). The world viewed (Enlarged edition). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cavell, S. (1979b). The claim of reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. De Vos, J. (2012). Psychologisation in times of globalisation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Giroux, H. (2011). Breaking into the movies: Public pedagogy and the politics of film. Policy Futures in Education, 9, 686–695.Google Scholar
  5. Grossvogel, D. (2007). The coercion of vision. Film Quarterly, 60(4), 36–43.Google Scholar
  6. Haneke, M. (1989). Der Siebente Kontinent.
  7. Rothman, W. (2003). Cavell on film, television, and opera. In R. Eldridge (Ed.), Stanley Cavell (pp. 206–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Sharrett, C. (2005). The Seventh Continent. Cinémathèque Annotations on Film, Issue, 34, February.
  9. Sorfa, D. (2006). Uneasy domesticity in the films of Michael Haneke. Studies in European Cinema, 3(2), 93–104. Google Scholar
  10. Wheatley, C. (2009). Michael Haneke’s cinema: The ethic of the image. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  11. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen (Philosophical investigations) (G. E. M. Anscombe, trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Liverpool Hope UniversityLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations