Skip to main content

The Concept of [Friendliness] in Robotics: Ethical Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 882 Accesses

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering ((ISCA,volume 95))

Abstract

Socially interactive robots differentiate from most other technologies in that they are embodied, autonomous, and mobile technologies capable of navigating, sensing, and interacting in social environments in a human-like way. By displaying behaviors that people identify as sentient such as showing to recognize people’s faces, making eye contact, and responding socially exhibiting emotions, robots create the illusion of interaction with a living being capable of affective reciprocity. The present paper discusses the ethical issues emerging from this context by analyzing the concept of [friendliness].

“Men have no more time to understand anything.

They buy things all readymade at the shops.

But there is no shop anywhere where one can buy friendship [...]”

—Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, The Little Prince

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An exception to this is the FP7 MOnarCH project.

References

  1. Sharkey AJC, Sharkey N (2010) The crying shame of robot nannies: an ethical appraisal. Interaction Studies 11:161–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Auger J (2014) Living With Robots: A Speculative Design Approach. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3(1):20–42. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger T (2005) Domestication of Media and Technology. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breazeal C (2004) Designing sociable robots. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Cacioppo J, Patrick B (2008) Loneliness: human nature and the need for social connection. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cambridge Dictionary (2018) http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/friendly

  7. Emmeche C (2014) Robot friendship: Can a robot be a friend? International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems 3(2). Insights from Natural and Artificial Systems, Special issue on The Semiosis of Cognition

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferreira M, Sequeira J (2014) The concept of [robot] in children and teens: Some Guidelines to the Design of Social Robots. International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems 3(2):35–47

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ferreira M, Sequeira J (2016) Making Believe or Just Pretending: the Problem of Deception in Children/Robots Interaction. In: Advances in Cooperative Robotics-Proceedings of the 19th CLAWAR Conference, World Scientific Publishing, London. UK

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ferreira M, Sequeira J (2017) Robots in Ageing Societies. In: Sequeira J, Tohki O, Kadar E, Virk G (eds) Ferreira M. Springer International Publishing AG, A World with Robots

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fox t, Dream Works (2000) Image Movers Playtone. Distributed by 2oth Century Fox (US) and Dream Works (International) . Release date 22 December 2000

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paro newsletter (2018) http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/med/shhcgg/others/Paro_newsletter.pdf

  13. Paro robots (2018) http://www.parorobots.com/

  14. Sharkey N (2008) Computer science: the ethical frontiers of robotics. Science 322:1800–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Mind Machines 16:141–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Statista (2018) https://www.statista.com/statistics/748128/estimated-collaborative-robot-sales-worldwide/

  17. The Free Dictionary (2018) http://www.thefreedictionary.com/friendly

  18. Turkle S (2011) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. VerbeekPPCC, (2008) Morality in design: design ethics and technological mediation. In: Vermaas P, Kroes P, Light A, Moore S (eds) Philosophy and design: from engineering to architecture. Springer, Berlin, pp 91–102

    Google Scholar 

  20. WikiHow (2018) http://www.wikihow.com/Be-Friendly

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Isabel Aldinhas Ferreira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aldinhas Ferreira, M.I. (2019). The Concept of [Friendliness] in Robotics: Ethical Challenges. In: Aldinhas Ferreira, M., Silva Sequeira, J., Singh Virk, G., Tokhi, M., E. Kadar, E. (eds) Robotics and Well-Being. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 95. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12524-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics