Advertisement

From Smart Concept to User Experience Practice a Synthetic Model of Reviewed and Organized Issues to Conceive Qualified Interactions

  • Cristina Caramelo GomesEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 69)

Abstract

Nowadays, we live in environments where smart products enable new processes of human and non-human interaction. Smart concepts push functions beyond traditional levels of expectation. It is widely appraised that smart concepts enhance products to make them respond to human needs and expectations. However, regardless of the level of complexity and intelligence of those products (regardless of scale, from home environment to an object), if the environment is non-user-friendly, users will reject them and eventually abandon them. Conceptualizing intelligent solutions is more often centered on the requirements of functions and overlooks the profile of users, a critical aspect to outline the experience. Present-day interaction between users and smart products should be enabled by their physical model, finishing, interface features and functional capabilities. The quality of experience is not only grounded on the type and efficiency of the task performed. The quality of the experience depends on: the physical experience (dimension, height, shape, finishing); the sensorial experience (how does the artifact stimulate the sensorial human system); the cognitive experience (how easy it is to interact with technology) and the emotional experience (is this a pleasant experience? Would we repeat it?) Moreover, outlining the users’ demands and expectations from environments, products and technology is also critical to reach qualified and appealing solutions. The aim of this paper is to establish the need of taking a different approach when conceptualizing smart environments and products, arguing that users can only understand inherent intelligence if the parameters that sponsor an emotional appealing experience are considered throughout the design process.

Keywords

Smart product User experience Emotional experience design 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work is financed by national funds by FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, under the Project UID/AUR/04026/2019.

References

  1. 1.
    Kopec, D.: Environmental Psychology for Design. Fairchild Books, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Grady, J.V., O’Grady, K.: A Designer’s Research Manual: Succeed in Design by Knowing Your Clients and What They Really Need. Rockport Publishers, Beverly (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stone, T.L.: Managing the Design Process-Concept Development: An Essential Manual for the Working Designer. Rockport Publishers, Beverly (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buyya, R., Dastjerdi, A.V.: Internet of Things: Principles and Paradigms. Morgan Kaufmann, Cambridge (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rowland, C., Goodman, E., Charlier, M., Light, A., Lui, A.: Designing Connected Products: UX for the Consumer Internet of Things. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooper, A., Reimann, R., Cronin, D., Noessel, C.: About Face: The Essentials of Interaction Design. Wiley, Indianapolis (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Preece, J., Sharp, H., Rogers, Y.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, Indianapolis (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pannafino, J.: Interdisciplinary Interaction Design: A Visual Guide to Basic Theories, Models and Ideas for Thinking and Designing for Interactive Web Design and Digital Device Experiences, 2nd edn. Assiduous Publishing (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weinschenk, S.: 100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People. New Riders, Berkeley (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greenberg, S., Carpendale, S., Marquardt, N., Buxton, B.: Sketching User Experiences: The Workbook. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hollnagel, E.: Handbook of Cognitive Task Design (Human Factors and Ergonomics). CRC Press, New Jersey (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salvendy, G., Karwowski, W.: Advances in Cognitive Ergonomics (Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics Series). CRC Press, New Jersey (2010). (Vol 3)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Falzon, P.: Cognitive Ergonomics: Understanding, Learning, and Designing Human-Computer Interaction (Computers and People). Academic Press. Kindle Edition (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Werby, O.: Interfaces.com: Cognitive Tools for Product Designers. CreateSpace. Kindle Edition (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moggridge, B.: Designing Interactions. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McKay, E.N.: UI is Communication: How to Design Intuitive, User Centered Interfaces by Focusing on Effective Communication. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tidwell, J.: Designing Interfaces: Patterns for Effective Interaction Design. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoober, S., Berkman, E.: Designing Mobile Interfaces: Patterns for Interaction Design. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crumlish, C., Malone, E.: Designing Social Interfaces: Principles, Patterns, and Practices for Improving the User Experience. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    LaViola, J.J., Kruijff, E., McMahan, R.P., Bowman, D., Poupyrev, I.P.: 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice. Wesley Professional, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    King, S., Chang, K.: Understanding Industrial Design: Principles for UX and Interaction Design. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J., Robinson, P.: Designing Inclusive Interactions: Inclusive Interactions Between People and Products in Their Contexts of Use. Springer, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Inclusive Design Research Centre—OCAD University. The Three Dimensions of Inclusive Design. http://idrc.ocadu.ca/. Last accessed 2018/6/8
  25. 25.
    Norman, D.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fortino, G., Trunfio, P.: Internet of Things Based on Smart Objects: Technology, Middleware and Applications. Springer, New York (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rose, D.: Enchanted Objects: Innovation, Design, and the Future of Technology. Scribner, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stanford, J.: Product Design and The Internet of Things: Designing The Future. Kindle Edition. Amazon Digital Services LLC (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Clements-Croome, D.: Intelligent Buildings: An Introduction. Routledge, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Johnson, J.: Designing with the Mind in Mind—Simple Guide to Understanding User Interface Design Guidelines, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham (2014)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kuniavsky, M.: Smart Things: Ubiquitous Computing User Experience Design. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham (2010)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bodine, K.: Service Design: The Most Important Design Discipline You’ve Never Heard Of. http://blogs.forrester.com/kerry_bodine/13-10-01-service_design_the_most_important_design_discipline_youve_never_heard_of. Last accessed 2018/6/8
  33. 33.
    Manzini, E., Coad, R.: Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation (Design Thinking, Design Theory). The MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goodwin, K., Cooper, A.: Designing for the Digital Age: How to Create Human-Centered Products and Services. Wiley, New Jersey (2009)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hartson, R., Pyla, P.: The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hurff, S.: Designing Products People Love: How Great Designers Create Successful Products. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2016)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ospina, D.: Emotion & Design: The Emotional Experience Design Framework. https://medium.com/@conductal/the-future-of-design-emotional-design-798a3f15d698. Last accessed 2018/6/8
  38. 38.
    Moggridge, B.: Designing Interactions. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    International Organization for Standardization: Ergonomics of human system interaction—Part 210: Human-Centered Design for Interactive Systems (formerly known as 13407) (2009)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hassenzahl, M.: Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, California (2010)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Albert, W., Tullis, T.: Measuring the User Experience—Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics (Interactive Technologies), 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Sebastopol (2013)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Steinfeld, E., Maisel, J.: Universal Design: Creating Inclusive Environments. Wiley, New Jersey (2012)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Carse, B., Thomson, A., Stansfield, B.: Use of biomechanical data in the inclusive design process: packaging design and the older adult. J. Eng. Des. 21(2–3), 289–303 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Maglogiannis, I., Betke, M., Pantziou, G., Makedon, F.: Assistive environments for the disabled and the senior citizens. Pers Ubiquit Comput. 18, 1–3 (2014). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00779-012-0616-0, last accessed 2018/6/8
  45. 45.
    Tiresias: Smart Home Environment. http://www.tiresias.org/cost219ter/inclusive_future/(14).pdf. Last accessed 2018/6/8
  46. 46.
    Crawford, M.: “Smart Homes”—Lay foundation for aging in place. In: FutureAge, pp. 36–38. July/August 2009. http://artikelpdf.co.cc/link/smart-homes-lay-foundation-for-aging-in-place/. Last accessed 2018/6/8
  47. 47.
    Pragnell, M., Spence, L., Roger Moore, R.: The Market Potential for Smart Homes, pp. X. http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/1859353789.pdf. Last accessed 2018/6/8
  48. 48.
    Lê, Q., Hoang, B.N., Barnet, T.: Smart Homes for Older People: Positive Aging in a Digital World. Future Internet 4(4), 607–617 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bierhoff, I., Panis, P.: Active involvement of older users in the design process of smart home technology. Gerontechnology 7(2), 74 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Suryadevara, N.K., Mukhopadhyay, S.C.: Smart Homes—Design, Implementation and Issues. Springer, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gallagher, W.: The Power of the Place: How our Surroundings Shape our Thoughts, Emotions and Actions. Harper Perennial, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Dewsbury, G.: Intelligent or “Smart” Home Technology. http://www.smartthinking.ukideas.com/IntellBuild.html. Last accessed 2018/6/6
  53. 53.
    Augusto, J.C.: Making SMART Homes Smarter. http://news.ulster.ac.uk/releases/2005/1669.html. Last accessed 2018/6/8

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CITAD, Architecture and Arts FacultyLusíada University of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations