Abstract
This chapter provides a review of the link between central place theory and the power laws for cities. A theory of city size distribution is proposed via a central place hierarchy a la Christaller (1933) either as an equilibrium results or an optimal allocation. Under a central place hierarchy, it is shown that a power law for cities emerges if the underlying heterogeneity in economies of scale across good is regularly varying. Furthermore, we show that an optimal allocation of cities conforms with a central place hierarchy if the underlying heterogeneity in economies of scale across good is a power function.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This is often called “hierarchy principle” in the literature.
- 2.
A fractal structure is a structure in which smaller parts of it resemble the entire structure.
- 3.
We do not discuss how to decide the optimal distance \(\ell _{1}\) here, since our focus is the city hierarchy between any two largest cities. Nevertheless, this is very crucial question for presenting a complete and meaningful model, please see Sect. 3.5 in Hsu et al. (2014) for the solution.
- 4.
For example, let \(t=z_{1}=\ell _{1}=1\). Consider a discontinuous setup cost requirement function: for an arbitrarily small \(e\in \left( 0,1\right) ,\phi \left( y\right) =1/13\) for \(y\in \left[ 0,e\right] \) and \(\phi \left( y\right) =1\) for \(y\in (e,1]\). It is readily verified that, in between two \(z_{1}\)-cities, the per capita cost is minimized by evenly placing two immediate sub-cities with \(z^{\prime }=e\).
References
Arlinghaus, S. L. (1985). Fractals take a central place. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 67(2):83–88.
Arlinghaus, S. L. and Arlinghaus, W. C. (1989). The fractal theory of central place geometry: a diophantine analysis of fractal generators for arbitrary löschian numbers. Geographical Analysis, 21(2):103–121.
Batty, M. and Longley, P. A. (1994). Fractal cities: a geometry of form and function. Academic press.
Beckmann, M. J. (1958). City hierarchies and the distribution of city size. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 6(3):243–248.
Champernowne, D. G. (1953). A model of income distribution. The Economic Journal, 63(250):318–351.
Chen, Y. (2011). Fractal systems of central places based on intermittency of space-filling. Chaos, solitons & fractals, 44(8):619–632.
Chen, Y. (2014). Multifractals of central place systems: Models, dimension spectrums, and empirical analysis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 402:266–282.
Chen, Y. and Zhou, Y. (2006). Reinterpreting central place networks using ideas from fractals and self-organized criticality. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(3):345–364.
Christaller, W. (1933). Central Places in Southern Germany, translated by C. W. Baskin (1966), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Dittmar, J. (2011). Cities, markets, and growth: the emergence of Zipf’s law. Working paper.
Eaton, B. C. and Lipsey, R. G. (1982). An economic theory of central places. The Economic Journal, 92(365):56–72.
Eeckhout, J. (2004). Gibrat’s law for (all) cities. American Economic Review, 94(5):1429–1451.
Frankhauser, P. (1998). The fractal approach. A new tool for the spatial analysis of urban agglomerations. Population: An English Selection, pages 205–240.
Fujita, M., Krugman, P. R., Venables, A. J. and Fujita, M. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade, volume 213. Wiley Online Library.
Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf’s law for cities: an explanation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3):739–767.
Gabaix, X. and Ioannides, Y. M. (2004). The evolution of city size distributions. In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, volume 4, pages 2341–2378. Elsevier.
Hales, T. C. (2001). The honeycomb conjecture. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 25(1):1–22.
Hsu, W.-T. (2012). Central place theory and city size distribution. The Economic Journal, 122(563):903–932.
Hsu, W.-T., Holmes, T. J. and Morgan, F. (2014). Optimal city hierarchy: A dynamic programming approach to central place theory. Journal of Economic Theory, 154:245–273.
Landman, B. A., Huang, A. J., Gifford, A., Vikram, D. S., Lim, I. A. L., Farrell, J. A., Bogovic, J. A., Hua, J., Chen, M., Jarso, S., et al. (2011). Multi-parametric neuroimaging reproducibility: a 3-t resource study. Neuroimage, 54(4):2854–2866.
Lederer, P. J. and Hurter, A. P. Jr. (1986). Competition of firms: Discriminatory pricing and location?, Econometrica, 54(3):623–640
Ljungqvist, L. and Sargent, T. J. (2012). Recursive Macroeconomic Theory. The MIT Press.
Mori, T., Nishikimi, K. and Smith, T. E. (2008). The number-average size rule: a new empirical relationship between industrial location and city size. Journal of Regional Science, 48(1):165–211.
Quinzii, M. and Thisse, J.-F. (1990). On the optimality of central places. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 1101–1119.
Simon, H. A. (1955). On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42(3/4):425–440.
Tabuchi, T. and Thisse, J.-F. (2006). Regional specialization, urban hierarchy, and commuting costs. International Economic Review, 47(4):1295–1317.
Tabuchi, T. and Thisse, J.-F. (2011). A new economic geography model of central places. Journal of Urban Economics, 69(2):240–252.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hsu, WT., Zou, X. (2019). Central Place Theory and the Power Law for Cities. In: D'Acci, L. (eds) The Mathematics of Urban Morphology. Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12381-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12381-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12380-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12381-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)