Skip to main content

Central Place Theory and the Power Law for Cities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Mathematics of Urban Morphology

Abstract

This chapter provides a review of the link between central place theory and the power laws for cities. A theory of city size distribution is proposed via a central place hierarchy a la Christaller (1933) either as an equilibrium results or an optimal allocation. Under a central place hierarchy, it is shown that a power law for cities emerges if the underlying heterogeneity in economies of scale across good is regularly varying. Furthermore, we show that an optimal allocation of cities conforms with a central place hierarchy if the underlying heterogeneity in economies of scale across good is a power function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is often called “hierarchy principle” in the literature.

  2. 2.

    A fractal structure is a structure in which smaller parts of it resemble the entire structure.

  3. 3.

    We do not discuss how to decide the optimal distance \(\ell _{1}\) here, since our focus is the city hierarchy between any two largest cities. Nevertheless, this is very crucial question for presenting a complete and meaningful model, please see Sect. 3.5 in Hsu et al. (2014) for the solution.

  4. 4.

    For example, let \(t=z_{1}=\ell _{1}=1\). Consider a discontinuous setup cost requirement function: for an arbitrarily small \(e\in \left( 0,1\right) ,\phi \left( y\right) =1/13\) for \(y\in \left[ 0,e\right] \) and \(\phi \left( y\right) =1\) for \(y\in (e,1]\). It is readily verified that, in between two \(z_{1}\)-cities, the per capita cost is minimized by evenly placing two immediate sub-cities with \(z^{\prime }=e\).

References

  • Arlinghaus, S. L. (1985). Fractals take a central place. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 67(2):83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus, S. L. and Arlinghaus, W. C. (1989). The fractal theory of central place geometry: a diophantine analysis of fractal generators for arbitrary löschian numbers. Geographical Analysis, 21(2):103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. and Longley, P. A. (1994). Fractal cities: a geometry of form and function. Academic press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, M. J. (1958). City hierarchies and the distribution of city size. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 6(3):243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champernowne, D. G. (1953). A model of income distribution. The Economic Journal, 63(250):318–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. (2011). Fractal systems of central places based on intermittency of space-filling. Chaos, solitons & fractals, 44(8):619–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. (2014). Multifractals of central place systems: Models, dimension spectrums, and empirical analysis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 402:266–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. and Zhou, Y. (2006). Reinterpreting central place networks using ideas from fractals and self-organized criticality. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(3):345–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christaller, W. (1933). Central Places in Southern Germany, translated by C. W. Baskin (1966), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, J. (2011). Cities, markets, and growth: the emergence of Zipf’s law. Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, B. C. and Lipsey, R. G. (1982). An economic theory of central places. The Economic Journal, 92(365):56–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhout, J. (2004). Gibrat’s law for (all) cities. American Economic Review, 94(5):1429–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankhauser, P. (1998). The fractal approach. A new tool for the spatial analysis of urban agglomerations. Population: An English Selection, pages 205–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., Krugman, P. R., Venables, A. J. and Fujita, M. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade, volume 213. Wiley Online Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf’s law for cities: an explanation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3):739–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix, X. and Ioannides, Y. M. (2004). The evolution of city size distributions. In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, volume 4, pages 2341–2378. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales, T. C. (2001). The honeycomb conjecture. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 25(1):1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, W.-T. (2012). Central place theory and city size distribution. The Economic Journal, 122(563):903–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, W.-T., Holmes, T. J. and Morgan, F. (2014). Optimal city hierarchy: A dynamic programming approach to central place theory. Journal of Economic Theory, 154:245–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, B. A., Huang, A. J., Gifford, A., Vikram, D. S., Lim, I. A. L., Farrell, J. A., Bogovic, J. A., Hua, J., Chen, M., Jarso, S., et al. (2011). Multi-parametric neuroimaging reproducibility: a 3-t resource study. Neuroimage, 54(4):2854–2866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, P. J. and Hurter, A. P. Jr. (1986). Competition of firms: Discriminatory pricing and location?, Econometrica, 54(3):623–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljungqvist, L. and Sargent, T. J. (2012). Recursive Macroeconomic Theory. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, T., Nishikimi, K. and Smith, T. E. (2008). The number-average size rule: a new empirical relationship between industrial location and city size. Journal of Regional Science, 48(1):165–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinzii, M. and Thisse, J.-F. (1990). On the optimality of central places. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 1101–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1955). On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42(3/4):425–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabuchi, T. and Thisse, J.-F. (2006). Regional specialization, urban hierarchy, and commuting costs. International Economic Review, 47(4):1295–1317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabuchi, T. and Thisse, J.-F. (2011). A new economic geography model of central places. Journal of Urban Economics, 69(2):240–252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Tai Hsu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hsu, WT., Zou, X. (2019). Central Place Theory and the Power Law for Cities. In: D'Acci, L. (eds) The Mathematics of Urban Morphology. Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12381-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics