Skip to main content

Complications of Neuromodulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Deer's Treatment of Pain
  • 123 Accesses

Abstract

All neuromodulation device operations are elective procedures. Accordingly, it is essential for referring practitioners and implanting practitioners to thoroughly understand the risks and that the implanting practitioner is aware of and utilizes the most up-to-date risk mitigation protocols and procedures. The most serious complications are those that lead to neurological injury and, fortunately, are rare. On the other hand the more commonly occurring complications and adverse events such as lead migration or fracture, hardware-related pain or discomfort, and aberrant stimulation are distressing to the patient, frustrating for the implanting practitioner, and often lead to increased costs since these scenarios may require repeated office visits and even hardware revision to adequately treat or resolve the problem. This chapter will discuss the most common and serious complications and adverse events associated with neuromodulation devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Bendel MA, O’Brien T, Hoelzer BC, Deer TR, Pittelkow TP, et al. Spinal cord stimulator related infections: findings from a multicenter retrospective analysis of 2737 implants. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(6):553–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deer TR, Lamer TJ, Pope JE, Falowski SM, Provenzano DA, Slavin K, et al. The neurostimulation appropriateness consensus committee (NACC) safety guidelines for the reduction of severe neurological injury. Neuromodulation. 2017a;20(1):15–30, Epub 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deer TR, Provenzano DA, Hanes M, Pope JE, Thomson SD, Russo MA, et al. Neurostimulation appropriateness consensus committee (NACC): recommendations for infection prevention and management. Neuromodulation. 2017b;20(1):31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzgibbon DR, Stephens LS, Posner KL, et al. Injury and liability associated with implantable devices for chronic pain. Anesthesiology. 2016;124:1384–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gazelka HM, Freeman ED, Hooten WM, Eldrige JS, Lamer TJ. Incidence of clinically significant percutaneous spinal cord stimulator lead migration. Neuromodulation. 2015;18(2):123–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hayek SM, Veizi E, Hanes M. Treatment-limiting complications of percutaneous spinal cord stimulator implants: a review of eight years of experience from an academic center database. Neuromodulation. 2015;18(7):603–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Levy R, Henderson J, Slavin K, et al. Incidence and avoidance of neurologic complications with paddle type spinal cord stimulation leads. Neuromodulation. 2011;14:412–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Narouze S, Benzon HT, Provenzano DA, Buvanendran A, De Andres J, Deer TR, et al. Interventional spine and pain procedures in patients on antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications: guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, the International Neuromodulation Society, the North American Neuromodulation Society, and the World Institute of Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:182–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neal JM, Barrington MJ, Brull R, Hadzic A, Hebl JR, Horlocker TT, et al. The second ASRA practice advisory on neurologic complications associated with regional anesthesia and pain medicine: executive summary 2015. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:401–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Petraglia FW, Farber SH, Gramer R, Verla T, Wang F, Thomas S, et al. The incidence of spinal cord injury in implantation of percutaneous and paddle electrodes for spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2016;19(1):85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shils JL, Arle JE. Intraoperative neurophysiologic methods for spinal cord stimulator placement under general anesthesia. Neuromodulation. 2012;15:560–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim J. Lamer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lamer, T.J. (2019). Complications of Neuromodulation. In: Deer, T., Pope, J., Lamer, T., Provenzano, D. (eds) Deer's Treatment of Pain. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12281-2_78

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12281-2_78

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12280-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12281-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics