Skip to main content
  • 632 Accesses

Abstract

Standardized effect sizes are frequently used, for example, in sample size planning and meta-analysis. However, they are often hard to interpret, and can be estimated in different ways. A measure that is better to interpret than the standardized difference of two means is the probability of superiority. The probability of superiority of paired (e.g., pretest and posttest) scores is the probability that of a randomly selected pair of scores the second (e.g., posttest) score is larger than the first (e.g., pretest ) score. The probability of superiority of independent (e.g., E- and C-group) scores is the probability that a randomly selected participant from one (e.g., The E- ) group has a larger score than a randomly selected participant from the other (e.g., C- ) group. The interpretability of observed test scores is facilitated by applying linear transformations to the scores. Two transformations are described. The Average Item Score (AIS) is the mean of the item scores of the test. The Proportion of Maximum Possible (POMP) score is the proportion that the observed test score takes of the distance between the minimum and maximum possible scores of the test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baguley, T. (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported? British Journal of Psychology, 100, 603–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1999). The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 315–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2012). Effect sizes for research: Univariate and multivariate applications (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L., & the Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gideon J. Mellenbergh .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mellenbergh, G.J. (2019). Unstandardized Effect Sizes. In: Counteracting Methodological Errors in Behavioral Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12272-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics