Abstract
The potential for positive sustainability impacts of Mobility as a Service schemes is frequently mentioned in both scientific literature and public media, although a systematic evaluation of potential impacts is lacking thus far. In preparation of an in-depth technology assessment, we conduct a scoping study aimed at achieving a better conceptualization of what core elements constitute Mobility as a Service, what risks and opportunities are associated with this concept and how these may be further analyzed as part of a technology assessment project. Reviewing a total of 95 sources from academic literature as well as grey literature and media reports, we provide a synthesis of the core elements of Mobility as a Service schemes, develop hypotheses on the risks and opportunities involved and propose a framework for further assessment of the associated sustainability impacts.
Keywords
- Technology assessment
- Mobility as a service
- Literature review
- Scoping study
- Sustainability
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Zweck A (2013) Technikbewertung auf Basis der VDI Richtlinie 3780. In: Simonis G (ed) Konzepte und Verfahren der Technikfolgenabschätzung. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 145–160
Tran TA, Daim T (2008) A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment. Technol Forecast Soc Change 75:1396–1405
Decker M, Schippl J (2015) Technikfolgenabschätzung. In: Kaltschmitt M, Schebeck L (eds) Umweltbewertung für Ingenieure. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp 403–437
Leible L (1994) Technikfolgenabschätzung oder Ökobilanz? Beispiel Rapsöl. Fat Sci Technol 96(5):161–168
Rantasila K (2015) The impact of mobility as a service concept to land use in finnish context. In: 2015 international conference on sustainable mobility applications, renewables and technology (SMART 2015). IEEE Press, New York, pp 140–146
Karlsson MA, Sochor J, Aapaoja A, Eckhardt J, König D (2017) Deliverable 4: impact Assessment MAASiFiE project funded by CEDR. VTT Technical Research Center, Espoo, Finland
Arnold A, Schippl J, Wassermann S (2018) Von der Nische in den Mainstream? Über Akteure, Angebote und das Diffusionspotential von mobility as a service. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Risiko- und Nachhaltigkeitsforschung 37:1–69
Niggebrugge T, Vos S, Lago P (2018) The sustainability of mobility as a service solutions evaluated through the software sustainability assessment method. VU Technical Report, Amsterdam
Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q 26(2):xiii–xxiii
Kuckartz U (2012) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Beltz Juventa, Weinheim-Basel
Jittrapirom P, Caiati V, Feneri AM, Ebrahimigharehbaghi S, Alonso-González MJ, Narayan J (2017) Mobility as a service: a critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Planning 2(2):13–25
Kamargianni M, Matyas M (2017) The Business ecosystem of mobility as a service. In: 96th Transportation research board (TRB) annual meeting. Washington DC, 8–12 January 2017
Smith G, Sochor J, Karlsson ICMA (2018) Mobility as a service: development scenarios and implications for public transport. Res Trans Econ (in press)
Smith G, Sochor J, Karlsson ICMA (2018) Public–private innovation: barriers in the case of mobility as a service in West Sweden. Public Management Review, pp 1–22
Hensher DA (2017) Future bus transport contracts under a mobility as a service (MaaS) regime in the digital age: are they likely to change? Transp Res Part A 98:86–96
Sarasini S, Sochor J, Arby H (2017) What characterises a sustainable MaaS business model? In: 1st International conference on mobility as a service (ICOMaaS). Tampere, Finland, November 28–29
Ho C, Hensher DA, Mulley C, Wong (2017) Prospects for switching out of conventional transport services to mobility as a service subscription plans: a stated choice study. In: Thredbo15-international conference series on competition and ownership in land passenger transport. Stockholm, 14–18 August
Sochor J, Strömberg H, Karlsson ICM (2014) Travelers’ motives for adopting a new, innovative travel service: insights from the UBIGO field operational test in Gothenburg, Sweden. In: 21st World congress on intelligent transport systems. Detroit, 7–11 Sept 2014
Sochor J, Strömberg H, Karlsson ICM (2015) An innovative mobility service to facilitate changes in travel behavior and mode choice. World congress on intelligent transportation systems. Bordeaux, 5–9 October, 2015
Sochor J, Karlsson IM, Strömberg H (2016) Trying out mobility as a service: experiences from a field trial and implications for understanding demand. J Trans Res Board pp 57–64
König D, Sochor J, Eckhardt J (2016) State-of-the-art survey on stakeholders’ expectations for Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): highlights from Europe. In: 11th European congress on intelligent transportation systems. Glasgow, 6–9 June
Li Y, Voege T (2017) Mobility as a service (MaaS) challenges of implementation and policy required. J Trans Technologies 7(2):95–106
Turner M, Budgen D, Brereton P (2003) Turning software into a service. Computer 36:38–44
Tsai WT, Bai XY, Huang Y (2014) Software-as-a-service (SaaS): perspectives and challenges. Sci China Info Sci 57:1–15
Hietanen S (2014) ‘Mobility as a Service’—the new transport model? ITS & Transport Management Supplement. Eurotransport 12(2):2–4
Holmberg PE, Collado M, Sarasini S, Williander M (2016) Mobility as a service- MaaS. Describing the framework (Final report MaaS framework). Viktoria Swedish ICT, Gothenburg
Belletti F, Bayen AM (2017) Privacy-preserving MaaS fleet management. In: 22nd international symposium on traffic and transportation theory. Transp Res procedia 23:1000–1024
Callegati F, Giallorenzo S, Melis A, Prandini M (2016) insider threats in emerging mobility-as-a-service scenarios. Cornell University, https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.06447
Kriukelyte E (2017) New challenges for transport planning—the institutionalization of mobility as a service in the Stockholm region. Degree Project. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Yadav P, Hasan S, Ojo A, Curry E (2017) The role of open data in driving sustainable mobility in nine smart cities. In: Proceedings of the 25th European conference on information systems (ECIS). Guimarães, Portugal, June 5–10, pp 1248–1263
Matyas M, Kamargianni M (2018) The potential of mobility as a service bundles as a mobility management tool. In: Transportation research board 97th annual meeting. Washington D.C., January 7–11
Mulley C (2017) Mobility as a services (MaaS)—does it have critical mass? Transp Rev 37:247–251
Gould E, Wehrmeyer W, Leach M (2015) Transition pathways of e-mobility services. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 194:349–359
Sochor J, Arby H, Karlsson ICMA, Sarasini S (2017) A topological approach to Mobility as a Service: a proposed tool for understanding requirements and effects, and for aiding the integration of societal goals. In: 1st international conference on mobility as a service (ICOMaaS). Tampere, Finland, November 28–29
Smith G, Sochor J, Karlsson MA (2017) Procuring Mobility as a Service: Exploring dialogues with potential bidders in West Sweden. ITS World Congress Montreal, October 29–November 2
Kosow H, Gaßner R (2007) Methods of future and scenario analysis. Overview, assessment and selection criteria. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Bonn
Bala BK, Arshad FM, Noh KM (2017) System dynamics—modeling and simulation. Springer, Singapore
Hausschild M, Rosenbaum RK, Olsen S (2018) Life cycle assessment theory and practice. Springer International Publishing, Basel
European Environment Agency (1998) Life cycle assessment (LCA)—a guide to approaches, experiences and information sources. Publication Office of the European Union, Brussels
Hinz T, Auspurg K, Liebig S (2009) Komplexität von Vignetten, Lerneffekte und Plausibilität im Faktoriellen Survey. MDA—Methoden Daten Analysen 3:59–96
Acknowledgements
This work is part of the project “Sustainable Consumption of Information and Communication Technology in the Digital Society—Dialogue and Transformation through Open Innovation”. The project is funded by the Ministry for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony and the Volkswagen Foundation (Volkswagen Stiftung) through the “Niedersächsisches Vorab” grant programme (grant number VWZN3037).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wittstock, R., Teuteberg, F. (2019). Sustainability Impacts of Mobility as a Service: A Scoping Study for Technology Assessment. In: Teuteberg, F., Hempel, M., Schebek, L. (eds) Progress in Life Cycle Assessment 2018. Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12266-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12266-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12265-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12266-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)