Skip to main content

Multi-Input Multi-Output Swept Sine Control: A Steepest Descent Solution for a Challenging Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) swept sine is nowadays acknowledged to be one of the best excitation techniques in applications where testing time is a constraint and high-quality Frequency Response Functions are compulsory. This is the case, for example, of testing large aerospace structures for model validation and updating. The high levels that can be reached during these tests can require a reliable MIMO closed-loop control strategy in order to guarantee that the response spectra will follow safe reference profiles (within defined tolerance limits). The development of a dedicated algorithm for these applications is however very challenging, especially due to the transient nature of the sweeps and the robustness of the MIMO controller. This paper proposes a steepest descent solution for the control of multiple inputs during a continuous sine-sweep, in order to simultaneously match specific response spectra for multiple control channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For this uncoupled example, the axes of the ellipsoidal cost function’s contours are well-aligned with the plane defined by the components of u u opt. This simplification, associated to the choice of controlling an uncoupled system, allows to draw considerations on the physical system, but generally these considerations are strictly valid only in the transformed space.

References

  1. Heylen, W., Lammens, S., Sas, P.: Modal Analysis Theory and Testing. K.U. Leuven, Leuven (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pauwels, S., Michel, J., Robijns, M., Peeters, B., Debille, J.: A new MIMO sine technique for accelerated, high quality FRF measurements. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Orlando, S., Peeters, B., Coppotelli, G.: Improved FRF estimators for MIMO sine sweep data. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gloth, G., Synapius, M.: Analysis of swept-sine runs during modal identification. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 18, 1421–1441 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peeters, B., Hendricx, W., Debille, J.: Modern solutions for ground vibration testing of large aircrafts. Sound Vib. 43(1) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fortescue, P., Swinerd, G., Stark, J.: Spacecraft Systems Engineering, 4th edn. Wiley, New York (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Waimer, S., Gentile, E., Manzato, S., Peeters, B., Wagner, M., Guillaume, P.: Modelling and experimental validation of a coupled electrodynamic shaker and test structure simulation model. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Waimer, S., Manzato, S., Peeters, B., Wagner, M., Guillaume, P.: Modelling and simulation of a closed-loop electrodynamic shaker and test structure model for spacecraft vibration testing. Adv. Aircr. Spacecr. Sci. 5, 205–223 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Musella, U., Zanellati, L., Grottoli, M., Celiberti, F., Peeters, B., Marulo, F., Guillaume, P.: Driving a motion platform with a vibration control software for multi-axis environmental testing: challenges and solutions. In: Proceedings of the XXXVI IMAC, Orlando (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Musella, U., D’Elia, G., Carrella, A., Peeters, B., Mucchi, E., Marulo, F., Guillaume, P.: A minimum drives automatic target definition procedure for multi-axis random control testing. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 107, 452–468 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pintelon, R., Schoukens, J.: System Identification: A Frequency Domain Approach. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Bendat, J., Piersol, A.G.: Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, vol. 729. Wiley, New York (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Underwood, M.: Multi-exciter testing applications, theory and practice. In: Proceedings of Institute of Environmental Sciences (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Musella, U., Longo, A., Vettori, S., Waimer, S., Di Lorenzo, E., Peeters, B., Marulo, F., Guillaume, P.: Recent advances in swept sine controlled excitation and processing for multi-input multi-output FRFs estimation. In: Proceedings of ISMA 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elliot, S.: Signal Processing for Active Control. Academic, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Siemens Industry Software N.V.: LMS Test.Lab Environmental, User Manual (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kreutz-Deglado, K.: The complex gradient operator and the \(\mathbb {C}\mathbb {R}\)-calculus, Preprint, ArXiv (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sorber, L., van Barel, M., de Lathauwer, L.: Unconstrained optimization of real functions in complex variables. SIAM J. Optim. 22(33), 879–898 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Musella, U., Manzato, S., Peeters, B., Guillaume, P.: \(\mathbb {C}\mathbb {R}\)-calculus and adaptive array theory applied to MIMO random vibration control tests. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. IOP Science 744(1), 012175 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer, C.D.: Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support of VLAIO is gratefully acknowledged (research grant ADVENT: ADvanced Vibration ENvironmental Testing).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umberto Musella .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Musella, U., Peeters, B., Marulo, F., Guillaume, P. (2020). Multi-Input Multi-Output Swept Sine Control: A Steepest Descent Solution for a Challenging Problem. In: Dervilis, N. (eds) Special Topics in Structural Dynamics & Experimental Techniques, Volume 5. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12243-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12243-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12242-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12243-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics