Advertisement

When Things Go Viral: Youth’s Discrimination Exposure in the World of Social Media

Chapter
  • 1.5k Downloads

Abstract

Youth receive a myriad of messages pertaining to their ethnicity and race daily. Youth today are overtly exposed to both interpersonal and institutional discrimination through dominating social media platforms, informed by the 24-hour news cycle. The world of social media serves as a critical platform for exposure, discourse, and engagment, underscoring the viral impact of ethnic-racial discrimination. Social media outlets, intended to foster rapid communication and community response, quickly become additional sources of marginalization and racial trauma, particularly for youth of color. The constant barrage of discriminatory content on social media, in which people of color are often dehumanized, not only distorts attitudes toward communities of color, but also shapes how youth perceive themselves and their communities. This chapter will discuss developmental implications for youth when discrimination “goes viral”. Applying a bioecological framework, this chapter unpacks the consequences of ethnic-racial discrimination in the digital social media environment and need for school, family, and policy related intervention. We conclude by identifying sources of adaptive coping and resilience to help educators, parents, and youth navigate and transform experiences with online ethnic-racial discrimination. Directions for future research, including the utility of algorithmic tools, are discussed.

Keywords

Adaptive coping Adolescence Critical media Cyber discrimination Digital social media Direct discrimination Ethnic-racial identity Ethnic-racial discrimination Harassment Online discrimination Risk and resiliency Race-related stress Social media Vicarious discrimination Viral messages 

References

  1. Anderson, M. & Hitlin, P. (2016). Social media conversations about race. Pew Research Center, Washington D.C. (August 15, 2016). http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/08/15/social-media-conversations-about-race/
  2. Angwin, J. & Grassegger, H. (2017, June 28). Facebook’s secret censorship rules protect white men from hate speech but not black children. ProPublica. Retrieved from: https://www.propublica.org/article/facebook-hate-speech-censorship-internal-documents-algorithms
  3. Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology. Washington, D.C: Pew Research Center. (May 31, 2018). http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/Google Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child development: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, C. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2005). Children’s perceptions of discrimination: A developmental model. Child Development, 76(3), 533–553.Google Scholar
  6. Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, in PMLR, 81, 77–91.Google Scholar
  7. Byrd, C. M., & Chavous, T. (2011). Racial identity, school racial climate, and school intrinsic motivation among African American youth: The importance of person-control congruence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 849–2012.Google Scholar
  8. Byrd, D. R., Hlas, A. C., Watzke, J., & Montes Valencia, M. F. (2011). An examination of culture knowledge: A study of l2 teachers’ and teacher educators’ beliefs and practices. Foreign Language Annals, 44, 4–39.Google Scholar
  9. Citron, D. K. (2014). Hate crimes in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Colby, S.L., & Ortman, J. M. (2015). Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060 population estimates and projections current population reports.Google Scholar
  11. Correll, J., Judd, C. M., Park, B., & Wittenbrink, B. (2010). Measuring prejudice, stereotypes and discrimination. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Daniels, J. (2013). Race and racism in internet studies: A review and critique. New Media & Society, 15(5), 695–719.Google Scholar
  13. Douglas, D. M. (2016). Doxing: A conceptual analysis. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(3), 199–210.Google Scholar
  14. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  15. García Coll, C. T., Lamberty, G., Jenkins, R., McAdoo, H. P., Cronic, K., Wasik, B. H., & Vazquez Garcia, H. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67, 1891–1914.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaylord-Harden, N. K., & Cunningham, J. A. (2009). The impact of racial discrimination and coping strategies on internalizing symptoms in African American youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(4), 532–543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hughes, D., Watford, J., & Del Toro, J. (2016). A transactional/ecological perspective on ethnic-racial identity, socialization, and discrimination. Equity And Justice In Developmental Science: Implications For Young People, 51, 1–41.Google Scholar
  18. Hutson, E., Kelly, S., & Militello, L. K. (2017). Systematic review of cyberbullying interventions for youth and parents with implications for evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 15, 72–79.Google Scholar
  19. Huynh, V. W., & Fuligni, A. J. (2010). Discrimination hurts: The academic, psychological, and physical well-being of adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(4), 916–941.Google Scholar
  20. Jenson, J. M., & Fraser, M. W. (2006). Social policy for children and families: A risk and resilience perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  21. Kahn, K. B., Spencer, K., & Glaser, J. (2013). Online prejudice and discrimination: From dating to hating. In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.), The social net: Understanding our online behavior (pp. 201–219). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kirkpatrick, K. (2016). Battling algorithmic bias: How do we ensure algorithms treat us fairly? Communications of the ACM, 59, 16–17.Google Scholar
  23. Lenhart, A. (2015). Teen, social media and technology overview. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C. (April 9, 2015). http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/
  24. Lenhart, A., Ybarra, M., Zickuhr, K., & Price-Feeney, M. (2016). Online harassment, digital abuse, and cyberstalking in America. New York: Data and Society Research Institute, and Center for Innovative Public Health.Google Scholar
  25. Lum, K., & Isaac, W. (2016). To predict and serve? Significance, 13, 14–19.Google Scholar
  26. Major, B., Gramzow, R., McCoy, S. K., Levin, S., Schmader, T., & Sidanius, J. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and status legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 782–796.Google Scholar
  27. Marks, A. K., Ejesi, K., McCullough, M. B., & Coll, C. G. (2015). Developmental implications of discrimination. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, 3, 1–42.Google Scholar
  28. Mayhew, A., & Weigle, P. (2017). Media engagement and identity formation among minority youth. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 2, 269–285.Google Scholar
  29. McFarland, J., Hussar, B., de Brey, C., et al. (2017). The condition of education 2017 (NCES 2017- 144). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved 20 Jan 2017 from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017144Google Scholar
  30. Melner, Y. (2018, April 4). An open letter to Facebook from the data for black lives movement. Retrieved from: https://medium.com/@YESHICAN/an-open-letter-to-facebook-from-the-data-for-black-lives-movement-81e693c6b46c
  31. Moessner, C. (2007). Cyberbullying. Harris Interactive Trends Tudes, 6, 1–4.Google Scholar
  32. Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Integrating social identity and social cognition: A framework for bridging diverse perspectives. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 26–54). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents’ psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 408–422.Google Scholar
  34. Rosen, L. D., Lim, A. F., Felt, J., Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., Lara-Ruiz, J. M., & Rokkum, J. (2014). Media and technology use predicts ill-being among children, preteens and teenagers independent of the negative health impacts of exercise and eating habits. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 364–375.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Sanders-Phillips, K., Settles-Reaves, B., Walker, D., & Brownlow, J. (2009). Social inequality and racial discrimination: Risk factors for health disparities in children of color. Pediatrics, 124, 176–186.Google Scholar
  36. Sellers, R. M., Caldwell, C., Schmeelk-Cone, K., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2003). Racial identity, racial discrimination, perceived stress, and psychological distress among African American young adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44(3), 302–317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Shapiro, R. (2018, April 9). Fox anchors slammed for calling black teen who got into 20 colleges ‘obnoxious’. Huffington Post. Retrieved from: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fox-5-dc-anchors-black-student-20-colleges_us_5acbdf40e4b07a3485e78869
  38. Spencer, M. B. (2006). Phenomenology and ecological systems theory: Development of diverse groups. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (Vol. 1, 6th ed., pp. 829–893). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Strasburger, V. C., Hogan, M. J., Mulligan, D. A., Ameenuddin, N., Christakis, D. A., Cross, C., … Moreno, M. A. (2013). Children, adolescents, and the media. Pediatrics, 132(5), 958–961.Google Scholar
  40. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup behavior (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Turner, J. R., & Avison, W. (2003). Status variations in stress exposure among young adults: Implications for the interpretation of prior research. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 488–505.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tynes, B. M. (2015). Online racial discrimination: A growing problem for adolescents. Psychological Science Agenda. http://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2015/12/online-racial-discrimination.aspx
  43. Tynes, B. M., Del Toro, J., & Lozada, F. T. (2015). An unwelcomed digital visitor in the classroom: The longitudinal impact of online racial discrimination on academic motivation. School Psychology Review, 44(4), 407–424.Google Scholar
  44. Tynes, B., Giang, M., Williams, D., & Thompson, G. (2008). Online racial discrimination and psychological adjustment among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(6), 565–569.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.08.021CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tynes, B. M., Hiss, S., Rose, C., Umaña -Taylor, A., Mitchell, K., & Williams, D. (2014). Internet use, online racial discrimination, and adjustment among a diverse, school- based sample of adolescents. International Journal of Gaming & Computer Mediated Simulations, 6(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
  46. Tynes, B. M., Rose, C. A., & Williams, D. R. (2010). The development and validation of the online victimization scale for adolescents. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research of Cyberspace, 4(2), article 1.Google Scholar
  47. Tynes, B. M., Rose, C. A., Hiss, S., Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Mitchell, K., & Williams, D. (2016). Virtual environments, online racial discrimination, and adjustment among a diverse, school-based sample of adolescents. Int J Gaming Comput Mediat Simul, 6(3), 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgcms.2014070101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Tynes, B., Reynolds, L., & Greenfield, P. M. (2004). Adolescence, race and ethnicity on the internet: A comparison of discourse in monitored and unmonitored chat rooms. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 667–684.Google Scholar
  49. Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Douglass, S., Updegraff, K. A., & Marsiglia, F. F. (2018). A small-scale randomized efficacy trial of the identity project: Promoting adolescents’ ethnic–racial identity exploration and resolution. Child development, 89, 862–870.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Tynes, B. M., Toomey, R. B., Williams, D., & Mitchell, K. (2015). Latino adolescents’ perceived discrimination in online and off-line settings: An examination of cultural risk and protective factors. Developmental Psychology, 51(1), 87–100.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Computer and internet use by children and adolescents in 2001, NCES 2004–014, by Matthew DeBell and Chris Chapman. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  52. Victor, D. (2017, August 17). Amateur sleuths aim to identify Charlottesville marchers, but sometimes misfire. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/14/us/charlottesville-doxxing.html
  53. Williams, D., & Mohammed, S. (2009). Discrimination and racial disparities in health: Evidence and needed research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 32(1), 2–38.Google Scholar
  54. Williams, D., Yu, J., & Jackson, J. (1997). Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socioeconomic status, stress, and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology, 2(3), 335–351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wong, C. A., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. (2003). The influence of ethnic discrimination and ethnic identification on African American adolescents' school and socioemotional adjustment. Journal of Personality, 71(6), 1197–1232.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations