Abstract
This paper studies a multi-fidelity resource optimization methodology for sensor location in the calibration of dynamics model parameters. Effective calibration can only be achieved if the information collection in the experiments is successful. This requires a thoughtful study of the sensor configuration to maximize information gain in the calibration of system parameters. This paper proposes a framework for optimizing the sensor number and locations to maximize information gain in the calibration of damping parameters for non-linear dynamics problems. Further, we extend the basic framework to the case of multi-fidelity modeling. In the presence of models of multiple fidelity, runs from the high-fidelity model can be used to correct the low-fidelity surrogate and result in stronger physics-informed priors for calibration with experimental data. This multi-fidelity calibration allows the fusion of information from low and high-fidelity models in inverse problems. The proposed sensor optimization methodology is illustrated for a curved panel subjected to acoustic and non-uniform thermal loading. Two models of different fidelity (a time history analysis and a frequency domain analysis) are employed to calibrate the structure’s damping parameters and model errors. The optimization methodology considers two complicating factors: (1) the damping behavior is input-dependent, and (2) the sensor uncertainty is affected by temperature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Shah, P.C., Udwadia, F.: Methodology for optimum sensor locations for parameter identification in dynamic systems. J. Eng. Mech. 120(2), 188–196 (1994)
Kammer, D.C.: Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 14, 251–259 (1991)
Kirkegaard, P.H., Brincker, R.: On the optimal location of sensors for parametric identification of linear structural systems. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 8, 639–647 (1994)
Heredia-Zavoni, E., Esteva, L.: Optimal instrumentation of uncertain structural systems subject to earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 27, 343–362 (1998)
Heredia-Zavoni, E., Montes-Iturrizaga, R., Esteva, L.: Optimal instrumentation of structures on flexible base for system identification. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28, 1471–1482 (1999)
Papadimitriou, C.: Pareto optimal sensor locations for structural identification. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194, 1655–1673 (2005)
Papadimitriou, C., Beck, J.L., Au, S.-K.: Entropy-based optimal sensor location for structural model updating. J. Vib. Control. 6, 781–800 (2000)
Papadopoulou, M., Raphael, B., Smith, I., Sekhar, C.: Hierarchical sensor placement using joint entropy and the effect of modeling error. Entropy. 16, 5078 (2014)
Hu, Z., Ao, D., Mahadevan, S.: Calibration experimental design considering field response and model uncertainty. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 318, 92–119 (2017)
Abdullah, M.M., Richardson, A., Hanif, J.: Placement of sensors/actuators on civil structures using genetic algorithms. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30, 1167–1184 (2001)
Raich, A.M., Liszkai, T.R.: Multi-objective optimization of sensor and excitation layouts for frequency response function-based structural damage identification. Comput. Aided Civ. Inf. Eng. 27, 95–117 (2012)
Guratzsch, R.F., Mahadevan, S.: Structural health monitoring sensor placement optimization under uncertainty. AIAA J. 48, 1281–1289 (2010)
Huan, X., Marzouk, Y.: Gradient-based stochastic optimization methods in Bayesian experimental design. Int. J. Uncertainty Quantification. 4, 479–510 (2014)
Nath, P., Hu, Z., Mahadevan, S.: Sensor placement for calibration of spatially varying model parameters. J. Comput. Phys. 343, 150–169 (2017)
Adhikari, S.: Damping Models for Structural Vibration, Trinity College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (2000)
Gordon, R.W., Hollkamp, J.J.: Reduced-order models for acoustic response prediction, DTIC Document (2011)
Hastings, W.K.: Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika. 57, 97–109 (1970)
Casella, G., George, E.I.: Explaining the Gibbs sampler. Am. Stat. 46, 167–174 (1992)
Neal, R.M.: Slice sampling. Ann. Statist. 31, 705–767 (2003)
Zhang, Z., Jiang, C., Han, X., Hu, D., Yu, S.: A response surface approach for structural reliability analysis using evidence theory. Adv. Eng. Softw. 69, 37–45 (2014)
Hurtado, J.E., Alvarez, D.A.: Neural-network-based reliability analysis: a comparative study. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191, 113–132 (2001)
Ghanem, R.G., Spanos, P.: Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach. Springer, Berlin (1991)
Romero, V.J., Swiler, L.P., Giunta, A.A.: Construction of response surfaces based on progressive-lattice-sampling experimental designs with application to uncertainty propagation. Struct. Saf. 26, 201–219 (2004)
Kullback, S., Leibler, R.A.: On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. 22, 79–86 (1951)
Absi, G.N., Mahadevan, S.: Input-dependence effects in dynamics model calibration. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 109, 285–304 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Absi, G.N., Mahadevan, S. (2020). Sensor Placement for Multi-Fidelity Dynamics Model Calibration. In: Barthorpe, R. (eds) Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12075-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12075-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12074-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12075-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)