Skip to main content

“Did I have chicken for lunch?”

Recalling What Just Happened

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Language, Dementia and Meaning Making
  • 368 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore key discursive patterns that underlie interactions that contain evidence of problems with memory about the recent past. Toward this end, we first situate the examination of these difficulties within ‘episodic memory’ (Tulving, Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory. Oxford: Academic, 1972; Kesney and Hunsacker, Behavioral Brain Research, 215(2), 299–309, 2010). We then characterize resourceful strategies used by some individuals with dementia to figure out how to answer questions by conversational partners that have uncovered a memory gap, followed by descriptions of repetitive language used by individuals with dementia in situations where they appear to have forgotten what they had just said or what they had just asked. We then focus on strategies used by conversational partners in the face of these stark memory problems, as they dismiss the need to recall the memory in question, build on the instance of forgetting, or change the topic abruptly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is intriguing to consider the important epistemic distinction between I must have forgotten and I forgot. The former instance indicates that the speaker does not even recall that he or she should have known the issue at question in the first place—and has only become aware of that fact through a presupposition in a discursive move by the conversational partner.

  2. 2.

    I am very grateful for insightful discussions with my then research assistant Marta Baffy as we examined these interactions in preparation for Hamilton and Baffy (2014).

  3. 3.

    I took this term to mean ‘the lounge’ as Elsie regularly referred to this space in this way (due perhaps to her word-finding difficulties). This information dovetailed with my prior knowledge regarding the practices in the assisted living center, where residents typically gathered to eat in a lounge rather than in a dining room. Note also my repetition of her term ‘up there’ in line 10 in my response in line 13.

  4. 4.

    Minor differences in the way in which this strategy was employed in Excerpt 3.20 in Sect. 3.6.4 and Excerpt 4.14 in this section are due primarily to the shape of the question that displayed the memory problem (Did I say that? in Excerpt 3.20 and What did I say? in Excerpt 4.14). The yes/no question in Excerpt 3.20 opened the opportunity for the ‘yes-and’ technique from improvisational theater to be implemented, as described in Sect. 3.6.4. This contrasts slightly with the wh-question used in this section which was followed by a content-level filling in of the episodic memory gap (That you felt infantilized) that was then used as a scaffold by the individual with dementia on which to build her subsequent conversational contributions.

References

  • Astell, A. J., Ellis, M. P., Alm, N., Dye, R., & Gowans, G. (2010). Stimulating people with dementia to reminisce using personal and generic photographs. International Journal Computers in Health, 1(2), 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayles, K., & Tomoeda, C. K. (2014). Cognitive-communication disorders of dementia: Definition, diagnosis, and treatment. San Diego: Plural Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay in the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1979). The interaction construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, A. R., Ly, J., Elkin-Frankston, S., & O’Connor, M. G. (2008). ‘I know what I like’: Stability in aesthetic preference in Alzheimer’s patient. Brain and Cognition, 66(1), 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, H. E. (1996). Intratextuality, intertextuality, and the construction of identity as patient in Alzheimer’s disease. Text, 16, 61–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, H. E., & Baffy, M. (2014). Preparing for a theatrical performance: Writing scripts and shaping identities in an early memory loss support group. In R. Schrauf & N. Müller (Eds.), Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement (pp. 213–244). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (2012). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction (ROLSI), 45, 30–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, J. R. (2000). Memory in the dementias. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 441–459). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (2001). Distributed cognition. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (pp. 2068–2072). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hydén, L.-C. (2018). Dementia, embodied memories, and the self. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(7–8), 225–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesney, K. P., & Hunsaker, N. R. (2010). The temporal attributes of episodic memory. Behavioral Brain Research, 215(2), 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In W. Labov (Ed.), Language in the inner city (pp. 354–396). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A. (1980). Telling my side: ‘Limited access’ as a ‘fishing’ device. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 186–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 1–2). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P. A., de Medeiros, K., & Bartell, A. (2011). ‘Oh he was forgettable’: Construction of self identity through use of communicative coping behaviors in the discourse of persons with cognitive impairments. Dementia, 10(3), 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setti, A., & Borghi, A. M. (2018). Editorial: Embodied cognition over the lifespan: Theoretical issues and implications for applied settings. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory. Oxford: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1984). Elements of episodic memory (precis). Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 7, 223–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (1997). Cognitive context models and discourse. In M. I. Stamenov (Ed.), Language structure, discourse and the access to consciousness (pp. 189–226). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hamilton, H.E. (2019). “Did I have chicken for lunch?”. In: Language, Dementia and Meaning Making. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12021-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12021-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12020-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12021-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics