Skip to main content

Knocking and Combustion Noise Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reciprocating Engine Combustion Diagnostics

Part of the book series: Mechanical Engineering Series ((MES))

Abstract

Knock is an abnormal and stochastic combustion phenomenon which needs detailed analysis because it governs the power density of engine, fuel consumption (engine efficiency), and engine durability, as well as noise and emission characteristics. Typically, compression ratio of spark ignition (SI) engine is limited by knock characteristics or knock propensity. This chapter discusses the knock fundamentals including modes of knock, onset of knock, characteristic knock frequencies, and super-knock. The super-knock is an extremely intense knock phenomenon which limits the engine turbocharging and downsizing proposed for improving the fuel conversion efficiency in SI engine. Accurate and repeatable measurement of engine knock is an important aspect of knock analysis and control. In-cylinder pressure-based techniques are considered as the most reliable method for knock detection; however, installation of pressure transducers in the combustion chamber is both difficult and expensive. This chapter presents the detailed cylinder pressure-based knock detection and analysis methods. Cylinder pressure- and heat release-based knock intensity indices (in time and frequency domain) along with their signal processing methods are discussed. Different methods of knock characterization/detection including statistical methods, stochastic method, and wavelets are also discussed. To fulfill the requirement of a low-cost and nonintrusive alternative method, knock detection using ion current sensors, engine vibrations, and microphones is used. Reduction of combustion noise is required as the part of engine development process due to customer demands. The multiple degrees of freedom in engine control and calibration provides more scope to influence combustion noise, which is required to be measured first, to control effectively. This chapter presents the discussion on the combustion noise estimation from the in-cylinder pressure measurements. Different combustion noise metrics are discussed along with their calculation algorithms and signal processing techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AEFD:

Average energy in frequency domain

AEHR:

Average energy of the heat release

AEHRO:

Average energy of heat release oscillations

ATDC:

After top dead center

BDC:

Bottom dead center

BTDC:

Before top dead center

CA:

Crank angle

CAD:

Crank angle degree

CDC:

Convention diesel combustion

CDF:

Cumulative distribution function

CI:

Compression ignition

CNL:

Combustion noise level

COV:

Coefficient of variation

CPL:

Cylinder pressure level

dB:

Decibel

DI:

Direct injection

DISI:

Direct injection spark ignition

DKI:

Dimensionless knock indicator

DMP:

Derivative at maximum pressure position

EGR:

Exhaust gas recirculation

EMD:

Empirical mode decomposition

EOC:

End of combustion

FFT:

Fast Fourier transform

GCI:

Gasoline compression ignition

GIMEP:

Gross indicated mean effective pressure

HCCI:

Homogeneous charge compression ignition

HRR:

Heat release rate

ID:

Ignition delay

IMEP:

Indicated mean effective pressure

IMPG:

Integral of modulus of pressure gradient

IMPO:

Integral of the modulus of pressure oscillations

IVC:

Intake valve closing

KDI:

Knocking damage index

KI:

Knock intensity

KI1:

Knocking index

KLSA:

Knock-limited spark advance

KO:

Knock onset

LSPI:

Low-speed preignition

MAHRO:

Maximum amplitude of heat release oscillations

MAPO:

Maximum amplitude of pressure oscillations

MIAA:

Main injection advanced angle

MNL:

Mechanical noise level

MON:

Motor octane number

MPRR:

Maximum pressure rise rate

NCS:

Noise-canceling spike

NVH:

Noise vibration and harshness

OH:

Hydroxyl radical

OI:

Octane index

ON:

Octane number

ON:

Overall noise

PCCI:

Premixed charge compression ignition

PDF:

Probability density function

PFI:

Port fuel injection

PIC:

Pilot injection combustion

PPC:

Partially premixed combustion

PPRR:

Peak pressure rise rate

PRF:

Primary reference fuel

PRR:

Pressure rise rate

PTP:

Peak to peak

RCCI:

Reactivity controlled compression ignition

RI:

Ringing intensity

RMS:

Root mean square

ROHRu:

Rate of heat release in unburnt charge

RON:

Research octane number

RSD:

Relative standard deviation

S:

Sensitivity

SA:

Structure attenuation

SACI:

Spark-assisted compression ignition

SEHRO:

Signal energy of heat release oscillations

SEPO:

Signal energy of pressure oscillations

SER:

Signal energy ratio

SI:

Spark ignition

SNR:

Signal-to-noise ratio

SPL:

Sound pressure level

ST:

Spark timing

STFT:

Short-time Fourier transform

TDC:

Top dead center

TN:

Toluene number

TRF:

Toluene reference fuels

TVE:

Threshold value exceeded

WD:

Wigner distribution

A :

Area of the reaction front

a :

Speed of sound

B i,j :

Bessel constant

D :

Cylinder diameter

E res :

Signal energy of the resonance pressure oscillations

f i,j :

Resonance frequency

f Nyq :

Nyquist frequency

f s :

Sampling frequency

I 1 :

Combustion indicator

I 2 :

Resonance indicator

n idle :

Idle engine speed

P :

Pressure

p bp :

Band-pass filtered pressure

P in :

Intake pressure

P max :

Maximum pressure

P RMS :

Root mean square (RMS) value of the filtered pressure

p ub :

Unburned gas pressure

R 2 :

Correlation coefficient

T :

Temperature

T comp15 :

Compression pressure of 15 bar

t IVC :

Time of intake valve closing

t KNOCK :

Time of knock onset

T max :

Maximum temperature

T ub :

Unburned temperature

u a :

Velocity relative to the unburned gas

V :

Volume

τ :

Autoignition delay time

θ :

Crank angle position

ε :

Dimensionless reactivity parameter of hot spot

ξ :

Dimensionless resonance parameter

μ :

Mean

γ :

Specific heat ratio

σ :

Standard deviation

References

  1. Wang, Z., Liu, H., & Reitz, R. D. (2017). Knocking combustion in spark-ignition engines. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 61, 78–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heywood, J. B. (1988). Internal combustion engine fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhen, X., Wang, Y., Xu, S., Zhu, Y., Tao, C., Xu, T., & Song, M. (2012). The engine knock analysis—An overview. Applied Energy, 92, 628–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, Z., Liu, H., Song, T., Qi, Y., He, X., Shuai, S., & Wang, J. (2015). Relationship between super-knock and pre-ignition. International Journal of Engine Research, 16(2), 166–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers, D. R. (2010). Engine combustion: Pressure measurement and analysis. Warrendale: Society of Automotive Engineers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahendar, S. K., Erlandsson, A., & Adlercreutz, L. (2018). Challenges for spark ignition engines in heavy duty application: A review (No. 2018-01-0907). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mittal, V., Revier, B. M., & Heywood, J. B. (2007). Phenomena that determine knock onset in spark-ignition engines (No. 2007-01-0007). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kawahara, N., Tomita, E., & Sakata, Y. (2007). Auto-ignited kernels during knocking combustion in a spark-ignition engine. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 31(2), 2999–3006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Merola, S. S., & Vaglieco, B. M. (2007). Knock investigation by flame and radical species detection in spark ignition engine for different fuels. Energy Conversion and Management, 48(11), 2897–2910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McKenzie, J., & Cheng, W. K. (2016). The anatomy of knock (No. 2016-01-0704). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Westbrook, C. K. (2000). Chemical kinetics of hydrocarbon ignition in practical combustion systems. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 28(2), 1563–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalghatgi, G. (2018). Knock onset, knock intensity, superknock and preignition in spark ignition engines. International Journal of Engine Research, 19(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, L., Li, T., Yin, T., & Zheng, B. (2014). A predictive model for knock onset in spark-ignition engines with cooled EGR. Energy Conversion and Management, 87, 946–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Douaud, A. M., & Eyzat, P. (1978). Four-octane-number method for predicting the anti-knock behavior of fuels and engines (No. 780080). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Syed, I. Z., Mukherjee, A., & Naber, J. (2011). Numerical simulation of autoignition of gasoline-ethanol/air mixtures under different conditions of pressure, temperature, dilution, and equivalence ratio (No. 2011-01-0341). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Livengood, J. C., & Wu, P. C. (1955). Correlation of autoignition phenomena in internal combustion engines and rapid compression machines. In Symposium (International) on Combustion (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 347–356). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, K. S., & Ghandhi, J. (2012). Preliminary results from a simplified approach to modeling the distribution of engine knock (No. 2012-32-0004). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mittal, V., Heywood, J. B., & Green, W. H. (2010). The underlying physics and chemistry behind fuel sensitivity. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 3(1), 256–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kalghatgi, G., Head, R., Chang, J., Viollet, Y., Babiker, H., & Amer, A. (2014). An alternative method based on toluene/n-heptane surrogate fuels for rating the anti-knock quality of practical gasolines. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 7(3), 663–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Boot, M. D., Tian, M., Hensen, E. J., & Sarathy, S. M. (2017). Impact of fuel molecular structure on auto-ignition behavior–Design rules for future high performance gasolines. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 60, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalghatgi, G. T. (2001). Fuel anti-knock quality-Part I. Engine studies (No. 2001-01-3584). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Amer, A., Babiker, H., Chang, J., Kalghatgi, G., Adomeit, P., Brassat, A., & Günther, M. (2012). Fuel effects on knock in a highly boosted direct injection spark ignition engine. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 5(3), 1048–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalghatgi, G., Risberg, P., & Ångstrom, H. E. (2003). A method of defining ignition quality of fuels in HCCI engines (No. 2003-01-1816). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kalghatgi, G. T., & Head, R. A. (2004). The available and required autoignition quality of gasoline-like fuels in HCCI engines at high temperatures (No. 2004-01-1969). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kalghatgi, G. T. (2005). Auto-ignition quality of practical fuels and implications for fuel requirements of future SI and HCCI engines (No. 2005-01-0239). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kalghatgi, G., Babiker, H., & Badra, J. (2015). A simple method to predict knock using toluene, n-heptane and iso-octane blends (TPRF) as gasoline surrogates. SAE International Journal of Engines, 8(2), 505–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shahlari, A. J., & Ghandhi, J. (2017). Pressure-based knock measurement issues (No. 2017-01-0668). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xiaofeng, G., Stone, R., Hudson, C., & Bradbury, I. (1993). The detection and quantification of knock in spark ignition engines (No. 932759). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Burgdorf, K., & Denbratt, I. (1997). Comparison of cylinder pressure based knock detection methods (No. 972932). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shahlari, A. J., & Ghandhi, J. B. (2012). A comparison of engine knock metrics (No. 2012-32-0007). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bradley, D., Morley, C., Gu, X. J., & Emerson, D. R. (2002). Amplified pressure waves during autoignition: Relevance to CAI engines (No. 2002-01-2868). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gu, X. J., Emerson, D. R., & Bradley, D. (2003). Modes of reaction front propagation from hot spots. Combustion and Flame, 133(1-2), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. König, G., Maly, R. R., Bradley, D., Lau, A. K. C., & Sheppard, C. G. W. (1990). Role of exothermic centres on knock initiation and knock damage. SAE Transactions, 99, 840–861.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, Z., Qi, Y., He, X., Wang, J., Shuai, S., & Law, C. K. (2015). Analysis of pre-ignition to super-knock: Hotspot-induced deflagration to detonation. Fuel, 144, 222–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zeldovich, Y. B. (1980). Regime classification of an exothermic reaction with nonuniform initial conditions. Combustion and Flame, 39(2), 211–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Qi, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, J., & He, X. (2015). Effects of thermodynamic conditions on the end gas combustion mode associated with engine knock. Combustion and Flame, 162(11), 4119–4128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bradley, D., & Kalghatgi, G. T. (2009). Influence of autoignition delay time characteristics of different fuels on pressure waves and knock in reciprocating engines. Combustion and Flame, 156(12), 2307–2318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kalghatgi, G. T., & Bradley, D. (2012). Pre-ignition and ‘super-knock’ in turbo-charged spark-ignition engines. International Journal of Engine Research, 13(4), 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hurle, I. R., Price, R. B., Sugden, T. M., & Thomas, A. (1968). Sound emission from open turbulent premixed flames. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 303(1475), 409–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim, K. S. (2015). Study of engine knock using a Monte Carlo method (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bates, L., Bradley, D., Paczko, G., & Peters, N. (2016). Engine hot spots: Modes of auto-ignition and reaction propagation. Combustion and Flame, 166, 80–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pasternak, M., Netzer, C., Mauss, F., Fischer, M., Sens, M., & Riess, M. (2017, December). Simulation of the effects of spark timing and external EGR on gasoline combustion under knock-limited operation at high speed and load. In International Conference on Knocking in Gasoline Engines (pp. 121–142). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou, L., Kang, R., Wei, H., Feng, D., Hua, J., Pan, J., & Chen, R. (2018). Experimental analysis of super-knock occurrence based on a spark ignition engine with high compression ratio. Energy, 165B, 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dahnz, C., Han, K. M., Spicher, U., Magar, M., Schießl, R., & Maas, U. (2010). Investigations on pre-ignition in highly supercharged SI engines. SAE International Journal of Engines, 3(1), 214–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Döhler, A., & Schaffner, P. (2017, December). Optical diagnostic tools for detection and evaluation of glow ignitions. In International Conference on Knocking in Gasoline Engines (pp. 55–70). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kalghatgi, G., Algunaibet, I., & Morganti, K. (2017). On knock intensity and superknock in SI engines. SAE International Journal of Engines, 10(2017-01-0689), 1051–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kassai, M., Shiraishi, T., & Noda, T. (2017, December). Fundamental mechanism analysis on the underlying processes of LSPI using experimental and modeling approaches. In International Conference on Knocking in Gasoline Engines (pp. 89–111). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Morikawa, K., Moriyoshi, Y., Kuboyama, T., Imai, Y., Yamada, T., & Hatamura, K. (2015). Investigation and improvement of LSPI phenomena and study of combustion strategy in highly boosted SI combustion in low speed range (No. 2015-01-0756). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jatana, G. S., Splitter, D. A., Kaul, B., & Szybist, J. P. (2018). Fuel property effects on low-speed pre-ignition. Fuel, 230, 474–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Spicher, U. (2017, December). Detection and analysis methods for irregular combustion in SI engines. In International Conference on Knocking in Gasoline Engines (pp. 225–242). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vressner, A., Lundin, A., Christensen, M., Tunestål, P., & Johansson, B. (2003). Pressure oscillations during rapid HCCI combustion. SAE Transactions, 2469–2478.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Draper, C. S. (1935). The physical effects of detonation in a closed cylindrical chamber. Technical report, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Guardiola, C., Pla, B., Bares, P., & Barbier, A. (2018). An analysis of the in-cylinder pressure resonance excitation in internal combustion engines. Applied Energy, 228, 1272–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Dahl, D., Andersson, M., & Denbratt, I. (2011). The origin of pressure waves in high load HCCI combustion: A high-speed video analysis. Combustion Science and Technology, 183(11), 1266–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wissink, M., Wang, Z., Splitter, D., Shahlari, A., & Reitz, R. D. (2013). Investigation of pressure oscillation modes and audible noise in RCCI, HCCI, and CDC (No. 2013-01-1652). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang, Q., Hao, Z., Zheng, X., & Yang, W. (2017). Characteristics and effect factors of pressure oscillation in multi-injection DI diesel engine at high-load conditions. Applied Energy, 195, 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Millo, F., & Ferraro, C. V. (1998). Knock in SI engines: a comparison between different techniques for detection and control (No. 982477). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Brunt, M. F., Pond, C. R., & Biundo, J. (1998). Gasoline engine knock analysis using cylinder pressure data (No. 980896). SAE Technical paper.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Puzinauskas, P. V. (1992). Examination of methods used to characterize engine knock (No. 920808). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lounici, M. S., Benbellil, M. A., Loubar, K., Niculescu, D. C., & Tazerout, M. (2017). Knock characterization and development of a new knock indicator for dual-fuel engines. Energy, 141, 2351–2361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Brecq, G., Bellettre, J., & Tazerout, M. (2003). A new indicator for knock detection in gas SI engines. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 42(5), 523–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Maurya, R. K. (2018). Characteristics and control of low temperature combustion engines: Employing gasoline, ethanol and methanol. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  63. Checkel, M. D., & Dale, J. D. (1989). Pressure trace knock measurement in a current si production engine (No. 890243). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Eng, J. A. (2002). Characterization of pressure waves in HCCI combustion (No. 2002-01-2859). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bares, P., Selmanaj, D., Guardiola, C., & Onder, C. (2018). A new knock event definition for knock detection and control optimization. Applied Thermal Engineering, 131, 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Hettinger, A., & Kulzer, A. (2009). A new method to detect knocking zones. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2(1), 645–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Galloni, E. (2012). Dynamic knock detection and quantification in a spark ignition engine by means of a pressure based method. Energy Conversion and Management, 64, 256–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Nilsson, Y., Frisk, E., & Nielsen, L. (2009). Weak knock characterization and detection for knock control. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 223(1), 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Peyton Jones, J. C., Spelina, J. M., & Frey, J. (2014). Optimizing knock thresholds for improved knock control. International Journal of Engine Research, 15(1), 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Galloni, E. (2016). Knock-limited spark angle setting by means of statistical or dynamic pressure based methods. Energy Conversion and Management, 116, 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Shayestehmanesh, S., Jones, J. C. P., & Frey, J. (2018). Stochastic characteristics of knock and IMEP (No. 2018-01-1155). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Cavina, N., Brusa, A., Rojo, N., & Corti, E. (2018). Statistical analysis of knock intensity probability distribution and development of 0-D predictive knock model for a SI TC engine (No. 2018-01-0858). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Naber, J., Blough, J. R., Frankowski, D., Goble, M., & Szpytman, J. E. (2006). Analysis of combustion knock metrics in spark-ignition engines (No. 2006-01-0400). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wei, H., Hua, J., Pan, M., Feng, D., Zhou, L., & Pan, J. (2018). Experimental investigation on knocking combustion characteristics of gasoline compression ignition engine. Energy, 143, 624–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhou, L., Hua, J., Wei, H., Dong, K., Feng, D., & Shu, G. (2018). Knock characteristics and combustion regime diagrams of multiple combustion modes based on experimental investigations. Applied Energy, 229, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ghandhi, J., & Kim, K. S. (2017). A statistical description of knock intensity and its prediction (No. 2017-01-0659). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Siano, D., & Bozza, F. (2013). Knock detection in a turbocharged SI engine based on ARMA technique and chemical kinetics (No. 2013-01-2510). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Tong, S., Yang, Z., He, X., Deng, J., Wu, Z., & Li, L. (2017). Knock and pre-ignition detection using ion current signal on a boosted gasoline engine (No. 2017-01-0792). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Abu-Qudais, M. (1996). Exhaust gas temperature for knock detection and control in spark ignition engine. Energy Conversion and Management, 37(9), 1383–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Spelina, J. M. (2016). Knock characterization, simulation, and control (PhD Thesis). Villanova University.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Kowada, M., Azumagakito, I., Nagai, T., Iwai, N., & Hiraoka, R. (2015). Study of knocking damage indexing based on optical measurement (No. 2015-01-0762). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Spicher, U., Kroger, H., & Ganser, J. (1991). Detection of knocking of combustion using simultaneously high speed Schlieren cinematography and multi-optical fibre technique. SAE Technical Paper 912312.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Nagai, T., Hiraoka, R., Iwai, N., Kowada, M., & Azumagakito, I. (2015). Development of highly durable optical probe for combustion measurement (No. 2015-01-0759). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Philipp, H., Hirsch, A., Baumgartner, M., Fernitz, G., Beidl, C., Piock, W., & Winklhofer, E. (2001). Localization of knock events in direct injection gasoline engines (No. 2001-01-1199). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Matsura, K., Sato, Y., Yoshida, K., & Sono, H. (2017). Proposal of knock mitigation method through enhancement of local heat transfer. In International Conference on Knocking in Gasoline Engines (pp. 3–16). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Giglio, V., Police, G., Rispoli, N., di Gaeta, A., Cecere, M., & Della Ragione, L. (2009). Experimental investigation on the use of ion current on SI engines for knock detection (No. 2009-01-2745). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Laganá, A. A., Lima, L. L., Justo, J. F., Arruda, B. A., & Santos, M. M. (2018). Identification of combustion and detonation in spark ignition engines using ion current signal. Fuel, 227, 469–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Daniels, C. F., Zhu, G. G., & Winkelman, J. (2003). Inaudible knock and partial-burn detection using in-cylinder ionization signal (No. 2003-01-3149). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Patro, T. N. (1997). Combustion induced powertrain NVH-a time-frequency analysis (No. 971874). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Kiencke, U., & Nielsen, L. (2005). Automotive control systems: For engine, driveline, and vehicle. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  91. Liu, C., Gao, Q., Jin, Y. A., & Yang, W. (2010). Application of wavelet packet transform in the knock detection of gasoline engines. In 2010 International Conference on Image Analysis and Signal Processing (IASP) (pp. 686–690). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Bi, F., Ma, T., & Wang, X. (2019). Development of a novel knock characteristic detection method for gasoline engines based on wavelet-denoising and EMD decomposition. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 117, 517–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Souder, J. S., Mack, J. H., Hedrick, J. K., & Dibble, R. W. (2004, January). Microphones and knock sensors for feedback control of HCCI engines. In ASME 2004 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference (pp. 77–84). New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  94. Hunger, M., Böcking, T., Walther, U., Günther, M., Freisinger, N., & Karl, G. (2017). Potential of direct water injection to reduce knocking and increase the efficiency of gasoline engines. In International Conference on Knocking in Gasoline Engines (pp. 338–359). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Fischer, M., Günther, M., Berger, C., Troeger, R., Pasternak, M., & Mauss, F. (2017). Suppressing knocking by using CleanEGR–better fuel economy and lower raw emissions simultaneously. In International Conference on Knocking in Gasoline Engines (pp. 363–384). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Alt, N. W., Nehl, J., Heuer, S., & Schlitzer, M. W. (2003). Prediction of combustion process induced vehicle interior noise (No. 2003-01-1435). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Schwarz, A., & Janicka, J. (Eds.). (2009). Combustion noise. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Broatch, A., Novella, R., Gomez-Soriano, J., Pal, P., & Som, S. (2018). Numerical methodology for optimization of compression-ignited engines considering combustion noise control. SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0193.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Flemming, F., Sadiki, A., & Janicka, J. (2007). Investigation of combustion noise using a LES/CAA hybrid approach. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 31(2), 3189–3196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Torregrosa, A. J., Broatch, A., Martín, J., & Monelletta, L. (2007). Combustion noise level assessment in direct injection diesel engines by means of in-cylinder pressure components. Measurement Science and Technology, 18(7), 2131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Payri, F., Broatch, A., Margot, X., & Monelletta, L. (2009). Sound quality assessment of diesel combustion noise using in-cylinder pressure components. Measurement Science and Technology, 20(1), 015107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Stanković, L., & Böhme, J. F. (1999). Time–frequency analysis of multiple resonances in combustion engine signals. Signal Processing, 79(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Payri, F., Torregrosa, A. J., Broatch, A., & Monelletta, L. (2009). Assessment of diesel combustion noise overall level in transient operation. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 10(6), 761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Ozawa, H., & Nakada, T. (1999). Pseudo cylinder pressure excitation for analyzing the noise characteristics of the engine structure. JSAE Review, 20(1), 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Russell, M. F., Palmer, D. C., & Young, C. D. (1984). Measuring diesel noise at source with a view to its control. IMechE, C142(84), 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Shahlari, A. J., Hocking, C., Kurtz, E., & Ghandhi, J. (2013). Comparison of compression ignition engine noise metrics in low-temperature combustion regimes. SAE International Journal of Engines, 6(1), 541–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Payri, F., Broatch, A., Tormos, B., & Marant, V. (2005). New methodology for in-cylinder pressure analysis in direct injection diesel engines—Application to combustion noise. Measurement Science and Technology, 16(2), 540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Broatch, A., Novella, R., García-Tíscar, J., & Gomez-Soriano, J. (2019). On the shift of acoustic characteristics of compression-ignited engines when operating with gasoline partially premixed combustion. Applied Thermal Engineering, 146, 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Shibata, G., Shibaike, Y., Ushijima, H., & Ogawa, H. (2013). Identification of factors influencing premixed diesel engine noise and mechanism of noise reduction by EGR and supercharging (No. 2013-01-0313). SAE Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Torregrosa, A. J., Broatch, A., Novella, R., Gomez-Soriano, J., & Mónico, L. F. (2017). Impact of gasoline and diesel blends on combustion noise and pollutant emissions in premixed charge compression ignition engines. Energy, 137, 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Shibata, G., Nakayama, D., Okamoto, Y., & Ogawa, H. (2016). Diesel engine combustion noise reduction by the control of timings and heating values in two stage high temperature heat releases. SAE International Journal of Engines, 9(2), 868–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Fuyuto, T., Taki, M., Ueda, R., Hattori, Y., Kuzuyama, H., & Umehara, T. (2014). Noise and emissions reduction by second injection in diesel PCCI combustion with split injection. SAE International Journal of Engines, 7(4), 1900–1910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Shibata, G., Ogawa, H., Okamoto, Y., Amanuma, Y., & Kobashi, Y. (2017). Combustion noise reduction with high thermal efficiency by the control of multiple fuel injections in premixed diesel engines. SAE International Journal of Engines, 10(3), 1128–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Bahri, B., Shahbakhti, M., & Aziz, A. A. (2017). Real-time modeling of ringing in HCCI engines using artificial neural networks. Energy, 125, 509–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Dernotte, J., Dec, J. E., & Ji, C. (2014). Investigation of the sources of combustion noise in HCCI engines. SAE International Journal of Engines, 7(2014-01-1272), 730–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Discussion/Investigation Questions

Discussion/Investigation Questions

  1. 1.

    Discuss the difference between normal and abnormal combustion in spark ignition engine. Describe the various factors responsible for abnormal combustion in SI engine.

  2. 2.

    Describe the term “knock” in a reciprocating engine. Discuss the possible reasons for engine knocking in SI engine, and explain the adverse effects of engine knocking over a long period.

  3. 3.

    Write the engine or operating variables affecting the temperature and density of the unburned charge toward the end of combustion in SI engine.

  4. 4.

    Discuss the factors responsible for cycle-to-cycle variations in the engine knocking. Describe the typical distribution of knock intensity on a cyclic basis.

  5. 5.

    A PFI gasoline SI engine is designed to operate at compression ratio 9 using gasoline with octane number (ON) 90 (typical gasoline). Discuss the expected problems that arise due to the increase in compression ratio to 12 (with modified engine) while running at the same fuel. Write the possible solution to the expected problems. Can ethanol or methanol be used on the modified engine at a compression ratio of 12?

  6. 6.

    Discuss the methods that can be used for the detection of knock onset in SI engine. Explain the merit and limitations of the methods.

  7. 7.

    Discuss the different modes of knock combustion in the engines. Write the different parameters affecting the transition of knock mode from deflagration to developing detonation.

  8. 8.

    Why measurement and characterization of knocking are important in internal combustion engines? Discuss the reason for knocking in SI, CI, and LTC (HCCI, RCCI, etc.) modes of engine operation. Draw a typical knocking cylinder pressure curve for all three modes of engine combustion.

  9. 9.

    What is engine super-knock? Discuss reasons for super-knock and method of characterization and mitigation of super-knock.

  10. 10.

    Three possible positions of the spark plug (black circle) in a spark ignition (SI) engine are shown Fig. P9.1. Identify the intake and exhaust valves in the configuration shown. Arrange three configurations (A, B, and C) in ascending order for octane number (ON) of fuel required to run the SI engine in each configuration, and justify your answer with suitable reasons.

  11. 11.

    Based on the two different designs of combustion chambers shown in Fig. P9.2, answer the following questions: (a) when combustion chamber design is changed from A to B, explain whether combustion rate will be faster, slower, or about the same rate. Justify your answer. (b) Which combustion chamber requires higher octane number fuel? If both engines are running on the same fuel, which engine can be operated at a higher compression ratio? Justify your answers.

  12. 12.

    You are given the engine map (Fig. P9.3) for a conventional homogeneous charge SI engine. (a) Looking at the engine map, identify whether the engine is naturally aspirated or it is turbocharged/supercharged. Mark the regions in the map where engine is most (highest) and least susceptible to knocking combustion. Justify your answers for the highest and lowest susceptibility toward knocking. (b) Assume engine is operating in a region susceptible to knocking, suggest two ways (actions to be performed) to run the engine in the non-knocking combustion.

  13. 13.

    Consider an SI engine in which the spark timing is maintained at the same crank angle and the air-fuel mixture is changed from stoichiometric to lean. What happens to the peak flame temperature as the air-fuel ratio is made lean from stoichiometric? Explain your answer. What would you expect to happen to the exhaust temperature for this situation? What about the tendency to knocking in such conditions?

  14. 14.

    Write the effect of engine operating variables on ignition, flame propagation, and knocking tendency by filling in the blanks in the Table P9.1 using the symbols provided. Discuss and justify your answers in terms of the governing phenomena or the factors responsible to it.

  15. 15.

    Spark ignition engines’ efficiency is mainly limited by three major factors, namely, knocking, fuel enrichment, and throttling. Figure P9.4 depicts the full-load curve of SI engine. Schematically identify zones corresponding to knocking, fuel enrichment, and throttling on engine operating map. You can draw few contour lines in the identified zones.

  16. 16.

    Knocking in SI engines is affected by several engine and operating parameters. Fill the following Table P9.2 showing the effect of increasing engine and operating variables on knock. Discuss these whether the engine parameters can be controlled by the engine operator or ECU to mitigate the knocking conditions.

  17. 17.

    Discuss the differences in knocking in CI and SI engines. Write the typical characteristics of the parameters given in table to reduce the knocking tendency in SI and CI engines. Fill the Table P9.3 with qualitative values such as low/high and long/short.

  18. 18.

    Describe the difference between a conventional knock and super-knock. Discuss the sources of super-knock and mode of combustion of super-knock in SI engine.

  19. 19.

    Discuss the sources of preignition in SI engine. Write the possible methods to avoid the preignition in reciprocating SI engine. Explain whether preignition always leads to knocking, and discuss the severity of preignition.

  20. 20.

    Write the effect of knocking (over a long period of time) on engine performance and its state. Discuss the different methods of knock detection in combustion engines. How you can differentiate the pressure oscillations during a weak knock and pressure oscillation due to the non-flush mounting of the sensor (pipe oscillations).

  21. 21.

    Discuss the phenomena of acoustic wave generation during knocking conditions, and also write the equation to determine the frequency of acoustic mode oscillation. Explain why the axial mode of oscillations is typically not observed in reciprocating engines.

  22. 22.

    Calculate the characteristic frequency of oscillation modes: First circumferential (1,0), second circumferential (2,0), third circumferential (3,0), and first radial (0,1) with corresponding Bessel constants 1.841, 3.054, 4.201, and 3.832, respectively. Compute the frequency corresponding to temperatures 2000 K, 2500 K, and 3000 K. Discuss the effect of the equivalence ratio of the charge on the frequency of oscillations.

  23. 23.

    Discuss the different knock indices based on in-cylinder pressure and heat release used for characterization of knock in internal combustion engines.

  24. 24.

    Discuss how wavelets can be used for characterization of engine knocking under different engine operating conditions.

  25. 25.

    Assume a gasoline SI engine having bore 60 mm and displacement volume of 400 cc working on the stoichiometric mixture with spark timing 15° before TDC. The spark plug is located at the center of the engine head. Assuming constant turbulent flame speed of 8.56 m/s, determine whether or not engine knocking will occur in the combustion chamber. Unburned gas temperature and pressure can be assumed to be constant throughout combustion with value 1650 K and 5 bar, respectively. An empirical relation for autoignition delay of a stoichiometric gasoline-air mixture is given as

    $$ {\tau}_{\mathrm{ignition}\kern0.34em \mathrm{delay}}\left[\mathrm{ms}\right]=0.08\cdot \frac{1}{P^{1.5}\left[\mathrm{MPa}\right]}\exp \left(\frac{3800}{T\left[K\right]}\right) $$

    Clearly state your assumptions if any.

  26. 26.

    Discuss how the setting of knock threshold limits the efficiency of the engine. Describe the methods used for setting the knock threshold and how it can be optimized.

  27. 27.

    Fill the Table P9.4 by discussing the effect of particle and operating condition on preignition in SI engine. Write the effect on increasing the value of variable on preignition (increase or decrease) along with the mechanism responsible for preignition.

  28. 28.

    Discuss the different sensing methodologies of engine knock in modern SI engine. Describe the merits and demerits of the method. Write the typical factors you will consider for selecting the knock detection methods.

  29. 29.

    Discuss the method for combustion noise level assessment in engines by means of in-cylinder pressure components? Explain various indices used for combustion noise determination base on cylinder pressure data.

Fig. P9.1
figure 54

Different spark plug installation configuration

Fig. P9.2
figure 55

Effect of piston bowl on combustion characteristics in SI engine

Fig. P9.3
figure 56

Conventional SI engine map (adapted from [2])

Table P9.1 Effect of ignition- and engine-related variables on flame propagation and knocking
Fig. P9.4
figure 57

Full-load torque curve of a SI engine

Table P9.2 Effect of engine parameters on knock in conventional SI engine
Table P9.3 Characteristics tending to reduce engine knocking conditions
Table P9.4 Effect on preignition in SI engine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maurya, R.K. (2019). Knocking and Combustion Noise Analysis. In: Reciprocating Engine Combustion Diagnostics. Mechanical Engineering Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11954-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11954-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11953-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11954-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics