Advertisement

Digital Entrepreneurship: MOOCs in Entrepreneurship Education the Case of Graz University of Technology

  • Stefan VorbachEmail author
  • Elisabeth Poandl
  • Ines Korajman
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 917)

Abstract

Digital Entrepreneurship has gained substantial attention in theory and practice in the last years. In addition, new technological as well as pedagogical approaches have emerged. A special focus is set on massive open online courses (MOOCs) in entrepreneurship education. MOOCs are one of the strongest trends in online education and influence the content and procedure of teaching and learning. The paper contributes to a better understanding of necessary capabilities, chances and risks of using MOOCs as a new way of teaching entrepreneurship for engineers at Graz University of Technology. It empirically investigates challenges and drivers for using MOOCs as a novel pedagogical concept. Results show that a lack of self-discipline to finish a MOOC as well as missing interaction with others are main hurdles compared to lectures with compulsory attendance at University. However, findings also reveal that MOOCs are flexible in terms of time and location, thus can add convenience in reaching education, particularly entrepreneurial education.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship education Digital entrepreneurship MOOC 

References

  1. 1.
    Mondal, M.K., Kumar, A., Bose, B.P.: Entrepreneurship education through MOOCs for accelerated economic growth. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 3rd International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE) (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2015.7375354
  2. 2.
    Duval-Couetil, N., Reed-Rhoads, T., Haghighi, S.: Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: involvement, attitudes and outcomes. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 28(2), 425–435 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Löbler, H.: Learning entrepreneurship from a constructivist perspective. Technol. Anal. Strat. Manage. 18(1), 19–38 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320500520460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, S.C., Hsiao, H.C., Chang, J.C., Chou, C.M., Chen, C.P., Shen, C.H.: Can the entrepreneurship course improve the entrepreneurial intentions of students? Int. Entrepren. Manage. J. (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0293-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cirulli, F., Elia, G., Lorenzo, G., Margherita, A., Solazzo, G.: The use of MOOCs to support personalized learning: an application in the technology entrepreneurship field. Knowl. Manage. E-Learning (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40790-1_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Flaherty, J., Phillips, C.: The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review. Internet Higher Educ. (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sousa, M.J., Carmo, M., Gonçalves, A.C., Cruz, R., Martins, J.M.: Creating knowledge and entrepreneurial capacity for HE students with digital education methodologies: differences in the perceptions of students and entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Res. 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Le Roux, I., Nagel, L.: Seeking the best blend for deep learning in a flipped classroom—viewing student perceptions through the Community of Inquiry lens. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High Educ. 15(16), 1–25 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0098-x
  9. 9.
    Sams, A., Bergmann, J.: Flip your students’ learning the best use of face time. Technol. Rich Learn.0 Pages 70(6), 16–20 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Israel, M.J.: Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 16(5), 102–115 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roehl, A., Linga, S., Gayla, R., Shannon, J.: the flipped classroom: an opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. J. Family and Consum. Sci. 105(2), 44–48 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Voogt, J., Roblin, N.P.: 21st century skills, Discussienota, Universiteit Twente (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Antonaci, A., Dagnino, F.M., Ott, M., Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., Lavagnino, E., Romero, M., Usart, M., Mayer, I.: A gamified collaborative course in entrepreneurship: focus on objectives and tools. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 1276–1283 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zaheer, H., Breyer, Y., Dumay, J., Enjeti, M.: Straight from the horse’s mouth: founders’ perspectives on achieving ‘traction’ in digital start-ups. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.002
  15. 15.
    Milian, R.P., Gurrisi, M: Educ. + Train. 59(9), 990–1006 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2016-0183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Porter, S.: InTo MOOC or Not to MOOC, pp. 3–6. Chandos Publishing, Sawston (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schulmeister, R.: Massive Open Online Courses, pp. 22-23, 32. Waxmann, Münster (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ebner, M., Kopp, M., Wittke, A., Schön, S.: Das O in MOOCs – über die Bedeutung freier Bildungsressourcen in frei zugänglichen Online-Kursen. HMD 4–7 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clark, D.: MOOCs: who’s using MOOCs? 10 different target audiences (2013). URL: http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.de/2013/04/moocs-whos-using-moocs-10-different.html
  20. 20.
    van Treeck, T., Himpsl-Gutermann, K., Robes, J.: Offene und partizipative Lerkonzepte. E-Portfolios, MOOCs und Flipped Classrooms. peDOCS 9–10 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Vorbach
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elisabeth Poandl
    • 1
  • Ines Korajman
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of General Management and OrganisationGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations