Skip to main content

Study Effort and Student Success: A MOOC Case Study

  • 1235 Accesses

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC,volume 916)

Abstract

Learning was once defined as the function of efforts spent in relation to efforts needed [3]. Provided that effort is closely linked to time, previous research has found a positive relationship between student effort over time and student success, both in university education and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). With the complex environment of tracing and identifying relevant data of student learning processes in MOOCs, this study employs learning analytics to examine this relationship for MITx 6.00x, an introductory programming and computer science MOOC hosted on the edX MOOC platform. A population sample from the MOOC (N = 32,621) was examined using logistic regression, controlling for variables that may also influence the outcome. Conversely, the outcome of this research study suggests that there is a curvilinear relationship between effort over time and student success, meaning those who exert effort for the longest amount of time in the MOOC actually have a lower probability of obtaining a certificate than others who exert effort over somewhat less time. Finally, research implications are discussed.

Keywords

  • Massive open online course (MOOC)
  • Efforts
  • Learning analytics
  • Logistic regression
  • Total time
  • Study success

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_22
  • Chapter length: 12 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-11932-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.

References

  1. Baker, R.S., Inventado, P.S.: Educational data mining and learning analytics. In: Learning Analytics: From Research to Practice, pp. 61–75. Springer, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bowman, N.A., Hill, P.L., Denson, N., Bronkema, R.: Keep on truckin’or stay the course? Exploring grit dimensions as differential predictors of educational achievement, satisfaction, and intentions. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 6(6), 639–645 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Carroll, J.: A model of school learning. Teach. Coll. Rec. 64(8), 723–733 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clow, D.: MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 185–189 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cross, T.M.: The gritty: grit and non-traditional doctoral student success. J. Educ. Online 11(3), 1–30 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Dweck, C.S.: The secret to raising smart kids. Sci. Am. Mind 18(6), 36–43 (2007)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Field, A.P., Miles, J., Field, Z.: Discovering Statistics Using R. Sage, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T., Collins, E.D., Sujitparapitaya, S.: Case study: using MOOCs for conventional college coursework. Distance Educ. 35(2), 178–201 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., Gasevic, D.: Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: the effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet High. Educ. 28, 68–84 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Gurria, A.: PISA 2015 results in focus. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf (2018)

  11. Hill, C., Corbett, C., St. Rose, A.: Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. American Association of University Women (AAUW) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Khalil, H., Ebner, M.: MOOCs completion rates and possible methods to improve retention-a literature review. In: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 1305–1313 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khalil, M., Ebner, M.: What massive open online course (MOOC) stakeholders can learn from learning analytics? In: Spector, M., Lockee, B., Childress, M. (eds.) Learning, Design, and Technology: An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, pp. 1–30. Springer, Heildelberg (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_3-1

  14. Kloft, M., Stiehler, F., Zheng, Z., Pinkwart, N.: Predicting MOOC dropout over weeks using machine learning methods. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Modeling Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs, pp. 60–65 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kuh, G.D., Cruce, T.M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R.M.: Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. J. High. Educ. 79(5), 540–563 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Lackner, E., Khalil, M., Ebner, M.: How to foster forum discussions within MOOCs: a case study. Int. J. Acad. Res. Educ. 2(2) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., Cormier, D.: The MOOC Model for Digital Practice (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mehmetoglu, M., Jakobsen, T.G.: Applied Statistics Using Stata: A Guide for the Social Sciences. Sage (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. MITx, HarvardX: HarvardX-MITx Person-Course Academic Year 2013 De-Identified dataset, version 2.0. Harvard Dataverse (2014). https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/26147

  20. Reeve, J.: Understanding Motivation and Emotion, 6th edn. Wiley (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reich, J., Emanuel, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D.T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., …, Ho, A.D.: HeroesX: The Ancient Greek Hero: Spring 2013 Course Report (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seaton, D.T., Reich, J., Nesterko, S.O., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., Ho, A.D., Chuang, I.: 6.00 x Introduction to Computer Science and Programming MITx on edX Course Report - 2012 Fall (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Strayhorn, T.L.: What role does grit play in the academic success of black male collegians at predominantly white institutions? J. Afr. Am. Stud. 18(1), 1–10 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, G., Anderson, T.J., Ohland, M.W., Thorndyke, B.R.: Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation: a longitudinal and cross-institutional study. J. Eng. Educ. 93(4), 313–320 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilkowski, J., Deutsch, A., Russell, D.M.: Student skill and goal achievement in the mapping with google MOOC. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale Conference, pp. 3–10 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeanette Samuelsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Samuelsen, J., Khalil, M. (2020). Study Effort and Student Success: A MOOC Case Study. In: Auer, M., Tsiatsos, T. (eds) The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education. ICL 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 916. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_22

Download citation