Skip to main content

New Financing Models in Behavioral Health: A Recipe for Efficiency or Under-Provision?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of American Mental Health Policy

Abstract

This chapter refers to innovations grouping services together for purposes of payment, such as shared-risk contracts, and pay-for-performance contracts and other forms of “bundling.” Bundling can improve the efficiency of the way in which inputs into health care are combined and the overall cost-effectiveness of care. When plans and providers operate in markets, adverse incentives can arise as well. This chapter emphasizes the importance of getting bundling right at a high level: paying private managed care plans, responsible for providing care to persons with behavioral health issues in the United States in Medicare, Medicaid, and some private health insurance, in a way that encourages them to accept and serve persons with chronic illnesses. Empirical evidence is reviewed for the effects of bundling in health plans, carve-outs, ACOs, and hospitals. The potential for bundling in critical areas of behavioral health care including early interventions in psychosis are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Newhouse, J. P. (1993). Free for All? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barry, C. L., Frank, R. G., & McGuire, T. G. (2006). The costs of mental health parity: Still an impediment? Health Affairs, 25(3), 623–634.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McGuire, T. G. (2016). Achieving mental health parity might require changes in payments and competition. Health Affairs, 35(6), 1029–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burns, L. R., & Pauly, M. V. (2018). Transformation of the health care industry: Curb your enthusiasm? Milbank Quarterly, 96(1), 57–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Glied, S. A., Stein, B. D., McGuire, T. G., Beale, R. R., Duffy, F. F., Shugarman, S., … Goldman, H. H. (2015). Measuring performance in psychiatry: A call to action. Psychiatric Services, 66, 872–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Newhouse, J. P. (2002). Pricing the priceless: A health care conundrum. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hodgkin, D., & McGuire, T. G. (1994). Payment levels and hospital response to prospective reimbursement. Journal of Health Economics, 13, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Layton, T. J., Ellis, R. P., McGuire, T. G., & Van Kleef, R. (2017). Measuring efficiency of health plan payment systems in managed competition health insurance markets. Journal of Health Economics, 56, 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frank, R. G., & McGuire, T. G. (2000). Economics of mental health. In Culyer & Newhouse (Eds.), Handbook of health economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ellis, R. P., & McGuire, T. G. (1986). Provider behavior under prospective reimbursement: Cost sharing and supply. Journal of Health Economics, 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Enthoven, A. C. (1980). Health plan: The only practical solution to the soaring cost of medical care. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McGuire, T. G., & R. van Kleef (eds.). (2018). Risk adjustment, risk sharing and premium regulation in health insurance markets: Theory and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Montz, E., Layton, T., Busch, A. B., Ellis, R. P., Rose, S., & McGuire, T. G. (2016). Risk adjustment simulation: Plans may have incentives to distort mental health and substance abuse coverage. Health Affairs, 35(6), 1022–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2011). Mental Illness Surveillance Among Adults in the United States (CDC Report). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mentalhealthsurveillance/fact_sheet.html.

  15. Raven, M. C., Billings, J. C., Goldfrank, L. R., Manheimer, E. D., & Gourevitch, M. N. (2009). Medicaid patients at high risk for frequent hospital admission: Real-time identification and remediable risks. Journal of Urban Health, 86(2), 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Clark, R. E., Samnaliev, M., & McGovern, M. P. (2007). Treatment for co-occurring mental and substance use disorders in five state Medicaid programs. Psychiatric Services, 1, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Layton, T. J., Nidikumana, A., & Shepard, M. (2018). Health plan payment in medicaid managed care: A hybrid model of regulated competition. In T. McGuire, & R. Van Kleef (Eds.), Risk adjustment, risk sharing and premium regulation in health insurance markets. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barry, C. L., Stuart, E. A., Donohue, J. M., Greenfield, S., Kouri, E., Duckworth, K., … Huskamp, H.A. (2015). The early impact of the ‘alternative quality contract’ on mental health service use and spending in Massachusetts. Health Affairs, 34(12), 2077–2085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stuart, E. A., Barry, C. L., Donohue, J. M., Greenfield, S. F., Duckworth, K., Song, Z., … Huskamp, H. A. (2016). Effects of accountable care and payment reform on substance use disorder treatment: evidence from the initial 3 years of the alternative quality contract. Addiction Research Report, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Song, Z., Rose, S., Safran, D. G., Landon, B. E., Day, M. P., & Chernew, M. E. (2014). Changes in health care spending and quality 4 years into global payment. The New England Journal of Medicine, 371(18), 1704–1714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Busch, A. B., Huskamp, H. A., & McWilliams, J. M. (2016). Early efforts by Medicare Accountable Care Organizations have limited effect on mental illness care and management. Health Affairs, 35(7), 1247–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Frank, R. G., & Manning, W. G. (1992). Economics and Mental Health. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Frank, R. G., & McGuire, T. G. (1998). The economic functions of carve-outs in managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care, 4(SP), SP31–SP39.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Carroll, C., Chernew, M. E., Fendrick, M. A., Thompson, J., & Rose, S. (2018). Effects of episode-based payment on health care spending and utilization: Evidence from perinatal care in Arkansas. Journal of Health Economics (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenthal, M. R. (1999). Risk sharing in managed behavioral health care. Health Affairs, 18(5), 204–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Frank, F. G., Glied, S. A., & McGuire, T. G. (2015). Paying for early interventions in psychoses: A three-part model. Psychiatric Services, 66(5), 677–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McGuire, T.G. (2020). New Financing Models in Behavioral Health: A Recipe for Efficiency or Under-Provision?. In: Goldman, H., Frank, R., Morrissey, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of American Mental Health Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11908-9_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics