Sharing Device Resources in Heterogeneous CPS Using Unique Identifiers with Multi-site Systems Environments
Cyber-physical systems environments offer value-added infrastructure by incorporating heterogeneous capabilities that provide a variety of data and processes over diverse and independent final devices. This can often leads to a complex setup that underuse the global capacities of the devices by preserving it in a single service process. By creating several identifiers for each service using specific devices, we can reuse multiple devices for several high layer individual services and processes. This paper proposes an architecture model and a division based on the different levels that are required to add the reutilization of the resources. This includes service replication schemes and device identification processes to the system. In addition, a first approximation of the methodology for providing unique identifiers is presented, in order to allow sharing device resources between different services.
KeywordsCyber-physical systems IoT Service provision Resource sharing
These results were supported by UPM’s ‘Programa Propio’. Additionally, the research leading to these results has received funding from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through SEMOLA project (TEC2015-68284-R) and from the Autonomous Region of Madrid through MOSIAGIL-CM project (grant P2013/ICE-3019, co-funded by EU Structural Funds FSE and FEDER).
- 1.Harrison, R., McLeod, C.S., Tavola, G., Taisch, M., Colombo, A.W., Karnouskos, S., Delsing, J., et al.: Next generation of engineering methods and tools for SOA-based large-scale and distributed process applications. In: Industrial Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems, pp. 137–165. Springer, Cham (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Jammes, F., Karnouskos, S., Bony, B., Nappey, P., Colombo, A.W., Delsing, J., Bangemann, T., et al.: Promising technologies for SOA-based industrial automation systems. In: Industrial Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems, pp. 89–109. Springer, Cham (2014)Google Scholar
- 4.Hoang, D.D., Paik, H.Y., Kim, C.K.: Service-oriented middleware architectures for cyber-physical systems. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. 12(1), 79–87 (2012)Google Scholar
- 6.Le, D.H., Narendra, N., Truong, H.L.: HINC-harmonizing diverse resource information across IoT, network functions, and clouds. In: IEEE 4th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud), pp. 317–324 (2016)Google Scholar
- 7.Sun, Y., Yang, G., Zhou, X.: A novel ontology-based service model for cyber physical system. In: IEEE 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology (ICCSNT), pp. 125–131 (2016)Google Scholar
- 8.Feljan, A.V., Mohalik, S.K., Jayaraman, M.B., Badrinath, R.: SOA-PE: a service-oriented architecture for planning and execution in cyber-physical systems. In: IEEE International Conference on Smart Sensors and Systems (IC-SSS), pp. 1–6 (2015)Google Scholar
- 9.Gurgen, L., Gunalp, O., Benazzouz, Y., Gallissot, M.: Self-aware cyber-physical systems and applications in smart buildings and cities. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe, EDA Consortium, pp. 1149–1154 (2013)Google Scholar
- 12.Erradi, A., Maheshwari, P., Tosic, V.: Policy-driven middleware for self-adaptation of web services compositions. In: ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Distributed Systems Platforms and Open Distributed Processing, pp. 62–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
- 13.Colombo, A.W., Karnouskos, S., Mendes, J.M.: Factory of the future: a service-oriented system of modular, dynamic reconfigurable and collaborative systems. In: Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Networked Manufacturing Enterprises Management, pp. 459–481. Springer, London (2010)Google Scholar
- 14.Samsung ARTIK Internet of Things (IoT) Platform. https://www.artik.io/. Accessed 31 May 2018