Abstract
The social environment in which corporations operate is affected by their actions but equally corporations experience the pressures of society. The idea that the economic environment is currently in a transition phase from the knowledge-based economy and society to the innovation economy and society is strongly emphasized by the policy makers and experts’ publications and reports underlining the pressure the companies are under in order to adjust to the environmental and economic changes and to become more competitive. The paper aims to develop and test, in a textile company from Iasi, a performance assessment model based on fuzzy modelling techniques. In order to assess corporate performance Balanced Scorecard approach was considered based on fuzzy technique. The corporate performance using lagging and leading indicators suggests that business performance should be evaluated not only by using financial indicators but also by simultaneously considering non-financial indicators. This way, it is possible to evaluate the business performance from a strategic perspective, taking into account not only past results but also leading indicators. The fuzzy it is suitable for industrial firms to monitor the performance indicators that can contribute to a sustainable competitive position.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Avram, E., & Avasilcai, S. (2014). Business performance measurement in relation to corporate social responsibility: A conceptual model development. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1142–1146.
Boj, J. J., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R., & Alfaro-Saiz, J. J. (2014). An ANP-multi-criteria-based methodology to link intangible assets and organizational performance in a Balanced Scorecard context. Decision Support Systems, 68, 98–110.
Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 33–59.
Ihsan, Y., & Dagdeviren, M. (2010). Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for balanced scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1270–1278.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70, 71–79.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75–85.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2006a). Alignment: Using the balanced scorecard to create corporate synergies. Boston: HBS Press.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2006b). How to implement a new strategy without disrupting your organization. Harvard Business Review, March, 100–109.
Lee, A. H. I., Chen, W. C., & Chang, C. J. (2008). A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 96–107.
Leon-Soriano, R., Munoz-Torez, M. J., & Chalmeta-Rosalen, R. (2010). Methodology for sustainability strategic planning and management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(2), 249–268.
Leung, L. C., Lam, K. C., & Cao, D. (2006). Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 682–691.
Lynch, R., & Cross, K. (1995). Measure up! Yardsticks for continuous improvement. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Neely, A. (2002). Business performance measurement: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Phillis, Y. A., & Andriantiatsaholiniaina, L. A. (2001). Sustainability: An ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic. Ecological Economics, 37, 435–456.
Phillis, Y. A., & Davis, B. J. (2008). Assessment of corporate sustainability via fuzzy logic. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 55, 3–20.
Phillis, Y. A., & Kouikoglou, V. S. (2009). Fuzzy measurement of sustainability. New York: Nova Science.
Rabbani, A., Zamani, M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 7316–7327.
Silk, S. (1998). Automating the balanced scorecard. Management Accountant, 79(11), 38–40.
Sohn, M. H., You, T., Lee, S.-L., & Lee, H. (2003). Corporate strategies, environmental forces, and performance measures: A weighting decision support system using the K-nearest neighbor technique. Expert Systems with Applications, 25, 279–292.
Sorooshian, S., Aziz, N. F., Ahmad, A., Jubidin, S. N., & Mustapha, N. M. (2016). Review on performance measurement systems. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 123–132.
Sveiby, K. (1997). The new organizational wealth. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Tseng, M. L. (2010). Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecard. Computers in Education, 55(1), 188–201.
Westbrook, R., Kumar, P., & Epstein, M. (2000). The drivers of customer and corporate profitability: Modeling, measuring and managing the causal relationships. Advances in Management Accounting, 9, 43–72.
Yuan, F. C., & Chiu, C. H. (2009). A hierarchical design of case-based reasoning in the balanced scorecard application. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 333–342.
Yüksel, İ., & Dağdeviren, M. (2010). Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1270–1278.
Acknowledgement
This research was undertaken within the framework of the National Research Program PN II, financed by MEN – UEFISCDI, project PN-II-PT-PCCA-2013-4-1811.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pîslaru, M., Avasilcăi, S., Alexa, L.E. (2019). Fuzzy Modeling of Customized Solutions for Corporate Performance Assessment. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Eurasian Business Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 10/1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11872-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11872-3_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11871-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11872-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)