Skip to main content

Fuzzy Modeling of Customized Solutions for Corporate Performance Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Eurasian Business Perspectives

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 10/1))

Abstract

The social environment in which corporations operate is affected by their actions but equally corporations experience the pressures of society. The idea that the economic environment is currently in a transition phase from the knowledge-based economy and society to the innovation economy and society is strongly emphasized by the policy makers and experts’ publications and reports underlining the pressure the companies are under in order to adjust to the environmental and economic changes and to become more competitive. The paper aims to develop and test, in a textile company from Iasi, a performance assessment model based on fuzzy modelling techniques. In order to assess corporate performance Balanced Scorecard approach was considered based on fuzzy technique. The corporate performance using lagging and leading indicators suggests that business performance should be evaluated not only by using financial indicators but also by simultaneously considering non-financial indicators. This way, it is possible to evaluate the business performance from a strategic perspective, taking into account not only past results but also leading indicators. The fuzzy it is suitable for industrial firms to monitor the performance indicators that can contribute to a sustainable competitive position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avram, E., & Avasilcai, S. (2014). Business performance measurement in relation to corporate social responsibility: A conceptual model development. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1142–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boj, J. J., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R., & Alfaro-Saiz, J. J. (2014). An ANP-multi-criteria-based methodology to link intangible assets and organizational performance in a Balanced Scorecard context. Decision Support Systems, 68, 98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihsan, Y., & Dagdeviren, M. (2010). Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for balanced scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1270–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2006a). Alignment: Using the balanced scorecard to create corporate synergies. Boston: HBS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2006b). How to implement a new strategy without disrupting your organization. Harvard Business Review, March, 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. H. I., Chen, W. C., & Chang, C. J. (2008). A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 96–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon-Soriano, R., Munoz-Torez, M. J., & Chalmeta-Rosalen, R. (2010). Methodology for sustainability strategic planning and management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(2), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, L. C., Lam, K. C., & Cao, D. (2006). Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 682–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, R., & Cross, K. (1995). Measure up! Yardsticks for continuous improvement. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A. (2002). Business performance measurement: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillis, Y. A., & Andriantiatsaholiniaina, L. A. (2001). Sustainability: An ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic. Ecological Economics, 37, 435–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillis, Y. A., & Davis, B. J. (2008). Assessment of corporate sustainability via fuzzy logic. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 55, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillis, Y. A., & Kouikoglou, V. S. (2009). Fuzzy measurement of sustainability. New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbani, A., Zamani, M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 7316–7327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silk, S. (1998). Automating the balanced scorecard. Management Accountant, 79(11), 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, M. H., You, T., Lee, S.-L., & Lee, H. (2003). Corporate strategies, environmental forces, and performance measures: A weighting decision support system using the K-nearest neighbor technique. Expert Systems with Applications, 25, 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorooshian, S., Aziz, N. F., Ahmad, A., Jubidin, S. N., & Mustapha, N. M. (2016). Review on performance measurement systems. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K. (1997). The new organizational wealth. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, M. L. (2010). Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecard. Computers in Education, 55(1), 188–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, R., Kumar, P., & Epstein, M. (2000). The drivers of customer and corporate profitability: Modeling, measuring and managing the causal relationships. Advances in Management Accounting, 9, 43–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, F. C., & Chiu, C. H. (2009). A hierarchical design of case-based reasoning in the balanced scorecard application. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yüksel, İ., & Dağdeviren, M. (2010). Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1270–1278.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was undertaken within the framework of the National Research Program PN II, financed by MEN – UEFISCDI, project PN-II-PT-PCCA-2013-4-1811.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius Pîslaru .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pîslaru, M., Avasilcăi, S., Alexa, L.E. (2019). Fuzzy Modeling of Customized Solutions for Corporate Performance Assessment. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Eurasian Business Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 10/1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11872-3_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics