Skip to main content

Sustainability and Life Cycle Product Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 937 Accesses

Part of the book series: Women in Engineering and Science ((WES))

Abstract

This chapter addresses problems that arise during product design for sustainability and the life cycle. A description of the problem itself is provided from an industrial engineering viewpoint. The first section describes the problem elements, including the need to expand the set of conflicting objectives under consideration, the need to consider the entire product life cycle, the need to employ new data acquisition tools, and the need to investigate the complex role of consumer behavior before, during, and after the point of purchase. Subsequent sections summarize work the authors have done towards solving these problems. A general mathematical programming framework is first presented. Then, the chapter highlightes several instances of the benefits of bringing the logic and mathematical rigor of industrial engineering methods to these problems. The authors’ previous contributions to sustainable design are presented and include defining the concept of the product life cycle from a decision-based design point of view, developing different types of decision-making techniques for engineering design (both subjective and objective), normative decision analytic methods (e.g., multiattribute utility, constrained optimization), methods for environmentally conscious design to cover new environmental objectives (e.g., connection of design with the end-of-use phase), and immersive computing technologies to address challenges with information-intensive design procedures. The final section presents methods to consider heterogeneous consumer behavior during product selection, use, and disposal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Behdad S, Thurston D (2012) Disassembly and reassembly sequence planning tradeoffs under uncertainty for product maintenance. ASME J Mech Des 134(4):41011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behdad S, Kwak M, Kim H, Thurston D (2010) Simultaneous selective disassembly and end-of-life decision making for multiple products that share disassembly operations. ASME J Mech Des 132(4):41002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behdad S, Williams AS, Thurston D (2012) End-of-life decision making with uncertain product return quantity. ASME J Mech Des 134(10):100902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behdad S, Berg LP, Thurston D, Vance J (2014a) Leveraging virtual reality experiences with mixed-integer nonlinear programming visualization of disassembly sequence planning under uncertainty. ASME J Mech Des 136(4):41005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behdad S, Berg L, Vance J, Thurston D (2014b) Immersive computing technology to investigate tradeoffs under uncertainty in disassembly sequence planning. ASME J Mech Des 136(7):71001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd G, Alting L (1992) Design for assembly and disassembly. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 41(2):625–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns CN (2005) E-waste and the consumer: improving options to reduce, reuse and recycle. Electronics and the environment, 2005. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international symposium on, pp 237–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho-Vallejo J-F, González-Rodríguez E, Almaguer F-J, González-Ramírez RG (2015) A bi-level optimization model for aid distribution after the occurrence of a disaster. J Clean Prod 105:134–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnahan JV, Thurston DL (1998) Trade-off modeling for product and manufacturing process design for the environment. J Ind Ecol 2(1):79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper T (2012) Longer lasting products: alternatives to the throwaway society. Gower Publishing, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan DD, Lucena CJP (1995) Abstract data views: an Interface specification concept to enhance design for reuse. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 21(3):229–243

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe D, Feinberg A (2001) Design for reliability. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbert R, Giannikas V, McFarlane D, Srinivasan R (2016) Repair services for domestic appliances. Springer, New York, pp 31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis C, Nikolić I, Dijkema GPJ (2009) Integration of life cycle assessment into agent-based modeling. J Ind Ecol 13(2):306–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du L, Peeta S (2014) A stochastic optimization model to reduce expected post-disaster response time through pre-disaster investment decisions. Netw Spat Econ 14(2):271–295

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fang C-C, Hsu C-C (2009) A study of making optimal marketing and warranty decisions for repairable products. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management. IEEE, Piscatawa, pp 905–909

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Faturechi R, Miller-Hooks E (2014) Travel time resilience of roadway networks under disaster. Transp Res B Methodol 70:47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaiardelli P, Cavalieri S, Saccani N (2008) Exploring the relationship between after-sales service strategies and design for X methodologies. Int J Prod Lifecycle Manag 3(4):261–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaustad G, Olivetti E, Kirchain R (2010) Design for recycling. J Ind Ecol 14(2):286–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghnevis M, Askin RG, Armbruster D (2016) An agent-based modeling optimization approach for understanding behavior of engineered complex adaptive systems. Socio Econ Plan Sci 56:67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harjula T, Rapoza B, Knight WA, Boothroyd G (1996) Design for disassembly and the environment. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 45(1):109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriwet A, Zussman E, Seliger G (1995) Systematic integration of design-for-recycling into product design. Int J Prod Econ 38(1):15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma T, Nakamori Y (2009) Modeling technological change in energy systems—from optimization to agent-based modeling. Energy 34(7):873–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodjanloo M, Parvasi SP, Ramezanian R (2016) A tri-level covering fortification model for facility protection against disturbance in R-interdiction median problem. Comput Ind Eng 102:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangun D, Thurston DL (2002) Incorporating component reuse, remanufacture, and recycle into product portfolio design. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 49(4):479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mashhadi AR, Esmaeilian B, Behdad S (2016) Simulation modeling of consumers’ participation in product take-back systems. ASME J Mech Des 138(5):51403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SA, Moysey S, Sharp B, Alfaro J (2013) A stochastic approach to model dynamic systems in life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 17(3):352–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nee AYC (ed) (2015) Handbook of manufacturing engineering and technology. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong SK, Nee AYC (2013) Virtual and augmented reality applications in manufacturing. Springer Science & Business Media, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck D, Kandachar P, Tempelman E (2015) Critical materials from a product design perspective. Mater Des (1980–2015) 65:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston F (2012) A global redesign? Shaping the circular economy. Energy Environ Res Gov 2:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner DK, Ames M (2014) Designing for repair? In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing—CSCW’14. ACM Press, New York, pp 319–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbaghi M, Esmaeilian B, Raihanian Mashhadi A, Behdad S, Cade W (2015a) An investigation of used electronics return flows: a data-driven approach to capture and predict consumers storage and utilization behavior. Waste Manag (New York, N.Y.) 36:305–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbaghi M, Esmaeilian B, Mashhadi AR, Cade W, Behdad S (2015b) Reusability assessment of lithium-ion laptop batteries based on consumers actual usage behavior. ASME J Mech Des 137(12):124501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbaghi M, Esmaeilian B, Cade W, Wiens K, Behdad S (2016) Business outcomes of product repairability: a survey-based study of consumer repair experiences. Resour Conserv Recycl 109:114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saccani N, Johansson P, Perona M (2007) Configuring the after-sales service supply chain: a multiple case study. Int J Prod Econ 110(1):52–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starita S, Scaparra MP (2018) Passenger railway network protection: a model with variable post-disruption demand service. J Oper Res Soc 69(4):603–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevels A (2002) Integration of ecodesign into business. In: Hundal MS (ed) Mechanical life cycle handbook. Good environmental design and manufacturing. Marcel Deker, New York, pp 583–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh NP (1998) Axiomatic design theory for systems. Res Eng Des 10(4):189–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston DL (1991) A formal method for subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes. Res Eng Des 3(2):105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston DL (2001) Real and misconceived limitations to decision based design with utility analysis. ASME J Mech Des 123(2):176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston DL, De La Torre JP (2007) Leasing and extended producer responsibility for personal computer component reuse. Int J Environ Pollut 29(1–3):104–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston DL, Carnahan JV, Liu T (1994) Optimization of design utility. ASME J Mech Des 116(3):801–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokunaga T, Fujimura S (2016) A unified theory of design structure matrix and axiomatic design for product architecture. J Mod Project Manag 3(3):114–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassenaar HJ, Chen W (2003) An approach to decision-based design with discrete choice analysis for demand modeling. ASME J Mech Des 125(3):490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi W, Nozick L, Davidson R, Blanton B, Colle B (2017) Optimization of the issuance of evacuation orders under evolving Hurricane conditions. Transp Res B Methodol 95:285–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation—USA under grants DMI-9528627, DMI-9908406, DMI-0726934, CMMI-1100177, CMMI-1068926, CMMI-1435908, CMMI-1727190, and CBET-1705621. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Behdad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thurston, D., Behdad, S. (2020). Sustainability and Life Cycle Product Design. In: Smith, A. (eds) Women in Industrial and Systems Engineering. Women in Engineering and Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11866-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11866-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11865-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11866-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics