Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Women in Industrial and Systems Engineering pp 391–416Cite as

Simulation-Based Approach to Evaluate the Effects of Food Supply Chain Mitigation and Compliance Strategies on Consumer Behavior and Risk Communication Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Women in Engineering and Science ((WES))

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) states that globally 1 in 10 people will become ill every year from eating a contaminated food product, resulting in 420,000 deaths. Food contamination can occur through several points within the food supply chain, a result of the intentional or accidental presence of biological/chemical contaminants. This has led public health officials to track food borne illness and create various mitigation strategies.

According to the Food Safety Modernization Act, companies are now required to develop Food Defense Plans that incorporate vulnerability assessments and mitigation strategies. However, the most common risk mitigation strategy to reduce illness is a recall. A recall can fall within three main classes to denote severity of risk associated with certain products. However, these classes are unclear to most consumers and delay their response to a contamination event. Therefore, companies need better risk communication practices in order to have full information for consumers to comply effectively with messages. Thirteen percent of Americans use information given by various media sources to look for recalled food products in their home. A survey conducted by Rutgers Food Institute Policy highlighted the common information that consumers feel they need during a recall which were identifying information (1) about the food product, (2) the food product source, and (3) where the food product is sold.

This chapter presents an overview of food supply chain vulnerabilities and the relationship between risk mitigation strategies and consumer behavior with a focus on messaging. We also discuss several approaches to modeling food supply chain contamination events and the associated impacts on consumers that incorporate consumer behavior, messaging, and recalls. We specifically consider consumer purchasing, consumption, and compliance behavior as a function of various risk mitigation strategies implemented in the food supply chain. The goal is to understand the extent of the contamination event, frequency and timing of the messaging, and recall notifications that reduce foodborne illness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akkerman R, Poorya F, Grunow M (2010) Quality, safety and sustainability in food distribution: a review of quantitative operations management approaches and challenges. OR Spectr 32(2):863–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Association (2014) The role of the government in regulating food: an overview. https://www.americanbar.org/publications/aba_health_esource/2013-14/february/the_role_of_the_government.html. Accessed 7 Feb 2018

  • Basak U, Datta B, Ghose P (2015) Mathematical analysis of an HIV/AIDS epidemic model. Am J Math Stat 5(5):253–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Batz M, Hoffmann S, Morris J (2011) Ranking the risks: the 10 pathogen-food combinations with the greatest burden on public health. https://epi.ufl.edu/blog/keeping-americas-food-supply-safe/

  • Blaynesh K, Cao Y, Kwon H (2009) Optimal control of vector-borne diseases: treatment and prevention. Discrete Continuous Dyn Syst Ser B 11(3):1–31

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan R, Appel B (2010) Combining analysis tools and mathematical modeling to enhance and harmonize food safety and food defense regulatory requirements. Int J Food Microbiol 139:S48–S56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraballo-Martinez K, Burt S (2011) Determining how and why consumer purchasing of grocery and household products varies. Afr J Bus Manag 5(16):6917–6926

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013a) Multistate outbreak of human salmonella Heidelberg infections linked to ground Turkey. http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/heidelberg/111011/

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013b) CDC estimates of foodborne illness in the United States. http://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/2011-foodborne-estimates.html

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013c) Timeline for reporting cases of salmonella infection. http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/reporting-timeline.html

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) Tracking and reporting foodborne disease outbreaks. http://www.cdc.gov/features/dsfoodborneoutbreaks/

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and US Department of Health and Human Services (2015) Surveillance for foodborne disease outbreaks United States, 2013, annual report

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang Y, Zhang Y, Erera AL, White C (2012) Vulnerability assessment of a food supply chain to an intentional attack. In: IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, pp 319–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang Y, Erera A, White C (2015a) A leader-follower partially observed, multiobjective Markov game. Ann Oper Res 235(1)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang Y, Erera A, White C (2015b) Value of information for a leader-follower partially observed Markov game. Ann Oper Res 235(1):129–153

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chao DL, Longini IM Jr, Halloran ME (2013) The effects of vector movement and distribution in a mathematical model of dengue transmission. PLoS One 8(10):e76044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi A, Armstrong B, Chaturvedi R (2014) Securing the food supply chain: understanding complex interdependence through agent-based simulation. Health Technol 4:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chebolu-Subramanian V, Gaukler G (2015) Product contamination in a multi-stage food supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 244:164–175

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Zhang J, Delaurentis T (2013) Quality control in food supply chain management: An analytical model and case study of the adulterated milk incident in china. Int J Prod Econ 152:188–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitnis N, Hyman J, Manore C (2012) Modelling vertical transmission in vector-borne diseases with applications to rift valley fever. J Biol Dyn 7(1):11–40

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks A, Hailegiorgis A (2014) An agent-based modeling approach applied to the spread of cholera. Environ Model Simul 62:164–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasakalis T, Pappis C, Rachaniotis N (2012) Epidemics control and logistic operations: A review. J Prod Econ 139:393–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Homeland Security Risk Steering Committee (2010) Dhs risk lexicon. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey C (2017) Why the FDA hides the names of grocery stores that sell contaminated food. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/03/13/fda-says-soynut-butter-could-make-your-child-sick-who-sold-it-thats-a-trade-secret/?utm_term=.03209f1e0acf. Accessed 6 Jan 2018

  • Dietz K (1967) Epidemics and rumors: a survey. J R Stat Soc Series A 130(4):505–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erongul B (2013) Consumer awareness and perception to food safety: a consumer analysis. Food Control 32:461–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2007) Food protection plan

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2017) Where did the FDA come from, and what does it do? https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/origins-FDA-what-does-it-do-180962054/. Accessed 7 Feb 2018

  • Fendyur A (2011) Applications of operations research/statistics in infection outbreak management. Int Business Econ Res J 10(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn D (2013) Turkish pomegranate seeds spread rare virus across U.S. http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2013/07/turkish-pomengranate-seeds-spread-rare-virus-across-u-s/#.VOQVFS7q9yV

  • Flynn D (2015) Schwan’s ice cream salmonella outbreak. http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2009/09/meaningful-outbreak-10-schwans-ice-cream-salmonella-outbreak/#.VraK9DyvsB

  • Foundation GC (2015) Food processing & slaughterhouses. http://www.sustainabletable.org/279/food-processing-slaughterhouses

  • Freberg K (2012) Intention to comply with crisis messages communicated via social media. Public Relat Rev 38:416–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao SJ, Teng ZD, Xie DH (2008) The effects of pulse vaccination on SEIR model with two time delays. Appl Math Comput 201(1–2):282–292

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gourley S, Liu R, Wu J (2007) Some vector borne diseases with structured host populations: extinction and spatial spread. J Appl Math 67(2):408–432

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office (2012) FDA’s food advisory and recall process needs strengthening

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm V, Berger U, Bastiansen F, Eliassen S, Ginot V, Giske J, Goss-Custard J, Grand T, Heinz SK, Huse G, Huth A, Jepsen JU, Jorgensen C, Mooij WM, Müller B, Pe’er G, Piou C, Railsback SF, Robbins AM, Robbins MM, Rossmanith E, Rüger N, Strand E, Souissi S, Stillman RA, Vabe R, Visser U, DeAngelis DL (2006) A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecol Model 198:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunert K (2002) Current issues in understanding of consumer food choice. Trends Food Sci Technol 13:275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallman W, Cutie C (2009) Food recalls and the American public: improving communications. Technical report. Rutgers University

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett E, Paoli GM, Schaffner DW (2009) Modeling the public health system response to a terrorist event in the food supply. Risk Anal 29(11):1506–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S (2008) A new SEIR epidemic model with application to the theory of eradication and control of diseases, and to the eradication of R0. Math Biosci 215:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaine A (2005) A predictive modeling and decision-making tool to facilitate government and industry response to an intentional contamination of the food supply. In: The Institute of Food Technologists’ First Annual Food Protection and Defense Conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkizlar E, Faissol DM, Griffin PM, Swann JL (2010) Timing of testing and treatment for asymptomatic diseases. Math Biosci 226(1):28–37

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles-McPhee S (2015) Growing food safety from the bottom up: an agent based model for food safety inspections. J Artif Soc Social Simul 18(2):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer GJ, Fasone V (2016) Consumer food trends create food safety challenges for the food service industry. https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/junejuly-2017/consumer-food-trends-create-food-safety-challenges-for-the-foodservice-industry/. Accessed 21 Jan 2018

  • Kuo HS, Chang HJ, Chou P, Teng L, Chen THH (1999) A Markov chain model to assess the efficacy of screening for non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Int J Epidemiol 28(2):233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JM, Choi D, Cho G, Kim Y (2012) The effect of public health interventions on the spread of influenza among cities. J Theor Biol 293:131–142

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wein LM (2005) Analyzing a bioterror attack on the food supply: the case of botulinum toxin in milk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(8):9984–9989

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wein LM (2008) Mathematically assessing the consequences of food terrorism scenarios. J Food Sci 73(7):M346–M353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manizini R, Accorsi R (2013) The new conceptual framework for food supply chain assessment. J Food Eng 115:251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marucheck A, Greis N, Mena C, Cai LN (2011) Product safety and security in the global supply chain: Issues, challenges and research opportunities. J Oper Manag 29(7-8):707–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohtadi H, Murshid AP (2009) Risk analysis of chemical, biological, or radionuclear threats: implications for food security. Risk Anal 29(9):1317–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Food Protection and Defense (2014) Overview. https://www.ncfpd.umn.edu/about/overview/

  • Ozair M, Lashari A, Jung I, Seo Y, Kim B (2013) Stability analysis of a vector-borne disease with variable human population. Abstr Appl Anal 2013:1–12

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheo-Cruz G, Esteva L, Vargas C (2014) Vaccination strategies for SIR vector-transmitted diseases. Bull Math Biol 76:2073–2090

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas S (2013) Cancer doctor’s alleged poisoning: how can ethylene glycol kill?

    Google Scholar 

  • Parham PE, Michael E (2011) Outbreak properties of epidemic models: the roles of temporal forcing and stochasticity on pathogen invasion dynamics. J Theor Biol 271(1):1–9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Paul J (2012) Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food. J Consum Mark 29(6):412–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rong A, Grunow M (2010) A methodology for controlling dispersion in food production and distribution. OR Spectr 32:957–978

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saulo A, Moskowitz H (2011) Uncovering the mind-sets of consumers towards food safety messages. Food Qual Prefer 22:422–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah NH, Gupta J (2013) SEIR model and simulation for vector borne diseases. Appl Math 4:13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sifferlin A (2015) 351,000 people die of food poisoning globally every year. http://time.com/3768003/351000-people-die-of-food-poisoning-globally-every-year/

  • Souza MO (2014) Multiscale analysis for a vector-borne epidemic model. J Math Biol 68(5):1269–1293

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Steelfisher G, Weldon K, Benson J, Blendon R (2010) Public perceptions of food recalls and production safety: two survey’s of the American public. J Food Saf 30:848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydsaeter K, Hammond PJ (1995) Mathematics for economic analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Talley JB (2016) Modeling individual consumer food contamination progression with interventions. Dissertation. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasty S (2015) Your ultimate shelf life guide. stilltasty.com

  • Teasley R, Bemley J, Davis LB, Erera A, Chang Y (2016) A Markov chain model for quantifying consumer risk in food supply chains. Health Syst 5(2):149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trottier H, Philippe P (2002) Deterministic modeling of infectious diseases: measles cycles and the role of births and vaccination. Internet J Infect Dis 2(2):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhry Z, Hedelin G, Colonna M, Asselain B, Arveux P, Exbrayat C, Guldenfelds C, Soler-Michel P, Molinie F, Tretarre B, Rogel A, Courtial I, Danzon A, Guizard AV, Ancelle-Park R, Eilstein D, Duffy S (2011) Modelling the effect of breast cancer screening on related mortality using French data. Cancer Epidemiol 35(3):235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2014) Food safety and inspection service protecting public health and preventing foodborne illness. https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/7a35776b-4717-43b5-b0ce-aeec64489fbd/mission-book.pdf?MOD=AJPERES. Accessed 3 Feb 2018

  • Viljoen S, Pienaar E, Viljoen H (2011) A state-time epidemiology model of tuberculosis: importance of re-infection. Comput Biol Chem 36:8

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vlajic JV, van der Vorst JG, van der Vorst AJ, Haijema R (2012) A framework for designing robust food supply chains. Int J Prod Econ 137(1):176–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward J, Ward L (2015) Principles of food science, 4th edn. Goodheart-Willcox, Tinley Park

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins ME (2015) Modeling consumer behavior for high risk foods. Master’s thesis. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei H, Zhi X, Martchova M (2008) An epidemic model of a vector-borne disease with direct transmission and time delay. J Math Anal Appl 342(2):895–908

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wei D, Zongchen F, Peng Z, Gang G, Xiaogang Q (2015) Mathematical and computational approaches to epidemic modeling: a comprehensive review. Front Comp Sci 9(5):806–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan P, Feng Z (2010) Variability order of the latent and the infectious periods in a deterministic SEIR epidemic model and evaluation of control effectiveness. Math Biosci 224(1):43–52

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zechmann E (2011) Agent-based modeling to simulate contamination events and evaluate threat management strategies in water distribution systems. Risk Anal 31(5):758–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Jessye Talley

  2. North Carolina A&T University, Greensboro, NC, USA

    Lauren B. Davis

Authors
  1. Jessye Talley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lauren B. Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren B. Davis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA

    Alice E. Smith

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Talley, J., Davis, L.B. (2020). Simulation-Based Approach to Evaluate the Effects of Food Supply Chain Mitigation and Compliance Strategies on Consumer Behavior and Risk Communication Methods. In: Smith, A. (eds) Women in Industrial and Systems Engineering. Women in Engineering and Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11866-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11866-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11865-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11866-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation