Abstract
In the traditional two-sector growth model, we show that the real wage rate and the rate of profit converge to positive values when the “constant returns to scale” is assumed. When the “decreasing returns to scale” is assumed, however, the real wage rate converges to zero. Thus, we examine how the trajectories are modified by the creation of a third sector, under the “decreasing returns to scale”. First, we examine the downstream innovation: i.e. the third sector produces a new luxury. This innovation is temporarily effective since it raises the average rate of profit, while the rate converges to the same positive value as in the basic model. Next, we introduce the third sector which produces a new energy: the upstream innovation. This innovation is temporarily effective in raising the real wage rate and the rate of profit so long as it takes place in the early stage. These rates, however, converge to zero. Although the effect on the rate of profit in the downstream innovation is greater than the upstream innovation, it is because the total investment in the latter is greater than the former. Thus, we conclude that the upstream innovation has stronger economic impact.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arrow, K. J., & Hahn, F. H. (1971). General competitive analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
Fukiharu, T. (1987). The classical economics from the neo-classical viewpoint. Kobe University Economic Review, 33, 71–99.
Fukiharu, T. (2013). Income distribution inequality, globalization, and innovation: A general equilibrium simulation. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 93, 117–127.
Fukiharu, T. (2017a). Two types of innovation and their economic impacts: A general equilibrium simulation [part I]. Accessed August 30, 2017, from http://www.cc.aoyama.ac.jp/~fukito/IndexII.htm.
Fukiharu, T. (2017b). Two types of innovation and their economic impacts: A general equilibrium simulation [part II]. Accessed August 04, 2017, from http://www.cc.aoyama.ac.jp/~fukito/IndexII.htm.
Fukiharu, T. (2017c). Two types of innovation and their economic impacts: A general equilibrium simulation [part III]. Accessed August 04, 2017, from http://www.cc.aoyama.ac.jp/~fukito/IndexII.htm.
Fukiharu, T. (2017d). Two types of innovation and their economic impacts: A general equilibrium simulation [part IV]. Accessed August 04, 2017, from http://www.cc.aoyama.ac.jp/~fukito/IndexII.htm.
Fukiharu, T. (2018). General equilibrium simulations on the income distribution. In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, & U. Can (Eds.), Eurasian economic perspectives: Proceedings of the 20th Eurasia business and economics society conference (Vol. 2, pp. 503–524). Cham: Springer.
Malthus, T. R. (1798). An essay on the principle of populations: Oxford world’s classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marx, K. H. (1867). Das Kapital (Capital: A critique of political economy). Accessed August 04, 2017, from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/.
Negishi, T. (1981). Classical economics and modern economics (in Japanese). Tokyo: Iwanami.
Pasinetti, L. L. (1960). A mathematical formulation of the ricardian system. Review of Economic Studies, 27, 78–98.
Ricardo, D. (1817, 1911). On the principles of political economy and taxation. London: Everyman’s Library.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1955). The theory of economic development, an inquiry into profit, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle (translation of Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, 1911, by Redvers Opie). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Smith, A. (1776, 1937). In E. Cannan (ed.), An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library.
Uzawa, H. (1961). On a two-sector model of economic growth, I. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 40–47.
Acknowledgement
The present author appreciates the helpful comments on the previous drafts given by Prof. Osamu Okochi (Hiroshima University) and Dr. Ender Demir (EBES), and the assistance given by Prof. Steve Lambacher (Aoyama Gakuin University) in making this paper readable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
The variation of the real wage and the rate of profit was also one of the main concerns of the classical economists, starting from Smith (1776), Malthus (1798), Ricardo (1817) to Marx (1867). They examined this variation in terms of labor theory of value. Pasinetti (1960) presented a mathematical formulation of Ricardo model, which was extended to Ricardo-Marx model by Fukiharu (1987) in the framework of the continuous type capital accumulation process. In what follows, the relation between Fukiharu (1987) and the Uzawa-type basic model of the present paper is examined in the framework of the discrete type capital accumulation process.
The Ricardo-Marx capital accumulation process in Fukiharu (1987) in the continuous version may be reformulated as in what follows utilizing the same variables and functions as in the main text.
A few remarks are in order. One parameter, \( \overline{x} \): fixed real wage rate in terms of consumption good, and one variable, p(t + 1): relative price of capital good in terms of consumption good, p 2/p 1, are newly introduced. The real wage rate is fixed at the subsistence level. The classical economists did not assume the full employment. The Eq. (24) implies the exchange between the first sector and the second sector. Noting that dN i/dy i = 1/\( \frac{\partial }{\partial {N}_i}{f}_i\left[{N}_i\left(t+1\right),{C}_i(t)\right] \) (i = 1, 2), the Eq. (25) implies the “marginal” labor theory of value, which was also assumed in Pasinetti (1960, p. 83). Ricardo appears to have accepted this type of labor theory of value (Negishi 1981). The Eq. (26) implies that the rate of profit, r, is equalized between the two sectors.
Under Eqs. (22)–(26), the capital accumulation process, C i(t + 1) = C i(t)(1 − g 1) + M i(t + 1) (i = 1, 2) is examined (t = 1, 2 …). Formulating these relations in terms of differential equations, Fukiharu (1987) asserted that the rate of profit on this capital accumulation process is constant when the “constant returns to scale” is assumed.
We have the following simulation result (Fukiharu 2017d):
-
1.
Under Eq. (3) when \( \overline{x} \)= 1, C 1(1) = 100, C 2(1) = 200, and g 1 = 0.05 are assumed, we have r(t) = 0.2 (t = 1, 2, …).
-
2.
Under Eq. (3) when \( \overline{x} \) = 1, C 1(1) = 10,000, C 2(1) = 10,000, and g 1 = 0.05 are assumed, we have r(t) = 0.2 (t = 1, 2, …).
-
3.
Under Eq. (9) when \( \overline{x} \) = 1, C 1(1) = 100, C 2(1) = 200, and g 1 = 0.05 are assumed, we have r(t) (t = 1, 2 …) as the dashed curve in Fig. 12.
-
4.
Under Eq. (9) when \( \overline{x} \)= 1, C 1(1) = 10,000, C 2(1) = 10,000, and g 1 = 0.05 are assumed, we have r(t) (t = 1, 2 …) as the solid curve in Fig. 12.
Considering Marx (1867), it may be strange to have the rising rate of profit on the capital accumulation process. It must be noted that these results stem from the large depreciation of capital: g 1 = 0.05. In this capital accumulation process, in fact, “capital deccumulation” emerges due to the capital depreciation: i.e. C i(t) (t = 1, 2 …) decreases monotonically. Indeed, we have the following:
-
5.
Under Eq. (9) when \( \overline{x} \)= 1, C 1(1) = 100, C 2(1) = 200, and g 1 = 0 are assumed, we have r(t) (t = 1, 2, …) as the dashed curve in Fig. 13.
-
6.
Under Eq. (9) when \( \overline{x} \)= 1, C 1(1) = 10,000, C 2(1) = 10,000, and g 1 = 0 are assumed, we have r(t) (t = 1, 2 …) as the solid curve in Fig. 13.
Indeed, in these cases, capital accumulation takes place: i.e. C i(t) (t = 1, 2 …) increases mototonically.
Thus, we may conclude that in the framework of classical economics, under “decreasing returns to scale”, the rate of profit declines on the capital accumulation while it remains constant under “constant returns to scale”.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fukiharu, T. (2019). Two Types of Innovation and Their Economic Impacts: A General Equilibrium Simulation. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 10/2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11833-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11833-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11832-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11833-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)