Skip to main content

Ground Surveys Versus UAV Photography: The Comparison of Two Tree Crown Mapping Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Technologies in the Research of Biodiversity

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to compare tree crown area obtained by the classical ground survey methods (GS) and by the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology. The study was carried out in Prioksko-Terrasny Biosphere Natural Reserve (Moscow region, Russia) on permanent sampling plot of 1 ha. All trees with DBH at least of 5 cm (779 ind.) were mapped and measured during ground survey in 2016. For each alive tree the radii of crown horizontal projection in four cardinal directions were measured, and the total area of all projections was calculated. The aerial photography by a quadcopter DJI Phantom 4 was conducted in 2017 on August, 2 from altitude of 58 m and on October, 12 (68 m). Obtained two orthophotomaps were used for manual vectorization of visible crown projections by means of QGIS and the total area of all projections was calculated. The total area of tree crown projections and the number of trees obtained by GS and UAV methods were matched well. Coniferous trees clearly differed from deciduous trees in aerial photography, also pine was different from spruce. Broadleaf trees (lime and oak) were difficult to detect. For pine the individual crown area obtained by UAV methods was significantly higher and slightly lower for birch and oak. There were no differences for other species. Our results confirmed that UAV technology could be used to obtaining of spatial information on forest characteristics, but tree species identification is still challenging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. James, M.R., Robson, S., d’Oleire-Oltmanns, S., Niethammer, U.: Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment. Geomorphology 280, 51–66 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.021

  2. van Iersel, W., Straatsma, M., Addink, E., Middelkoop, H.: Monitoring height and greenness of non-woody floodplain vegetation with UAV time series. ISPRS J. Photogrammetry and Remote Sens. 141, 112–123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.04.011

  3. Rossini, M., Di Mauro, B., Garzonio R., Baccolo, G., Cavallini, G., Mattavelli., M., Colombo R.: Rapid melting dynamics of an alpine glacier with repeated UAV photogrammetry. Geomorphology 304, 159–172 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.12.039

  4. Zhang, H., Sun, Y., Chang, Li., Qin, Y., Chen, J., Qin, Y., Du, J., Yi, S., Wang, Y.: Estimation of grassland canopy height and aboveground biomass at the quadrat scale using unmanned aerial vehicle. Remote sensing 10(6), 851 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060851

  5. Otero, V., Van De Kerchove, R., Satyanarayana, B., Martnez-Espinosa, C., Fisol, M.A.B., Ibrahim, M.R.B., Sulong, I., Mohd-Lokman, H., Lucas, R., Dahdouh-Guebas, F.: Managing mangrove forests from the sky: Forest inventory using field data and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imagery in the Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, peninsular Malaysia. For. Ecol. Manage 411, 35–45 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.049

  6. Zahavi, R.A., Dandois, J.P., Holl, K.D., Nadwodny, D., Reid, J.L., Ellis, E.C.: Using lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles to monitor tropical forest recovery. Biol. Conserv. 186, 287–295 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.031

  7. Zhang, J., Hu, J., Lian, J., Fan, Z., Ouyang, X., Ye, W.: Seeing the forest from drones: testing the potential of lightweight drones as a tool for long-term forest monitoring. Biol. Conserv. 198, 60–69 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.027

  8. Komarov, A.S., Chertov, O.G., Zudin, S.L., Nadporozhskaya, M.A., Mikhailov, A.V., Bykhovets, S.S., Zudina, E.V., Zoubkova, E.: EFIMOD 2–a model of growth and elements cycling of boreal forest ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 170, 373–392 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shanin, V.N., Shashkov, M.P., Ivanova, N.V., Grabarnik, P.Y.: The effect of aboveground competition on spatial structure and crown shape of the dominating canopy species of forest stands of European Russia. Russian J. Ecosyst. Ecol. 1(4) (2016). https://doi.org/10.21685/2500-0578-2016-4-5. (in Russian)

  10. Smirnova, O.V., Shaposhnikov, E.S. (eds.): Forest successions in protected areas of Russia and problems of biodiversity conservation. Russian Bot. Soc., St-Petersburg (1999). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lakatos, F., Mirtchev, S.: Manual for visual assessment of forest crown condition. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Pristina (2014). http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4214e.pdf

  12. Eichhorn, J., Roskams, P., Potočić, N., Timmermann, V., Ferretti, M., Mues, V., Szepesi, A., Durrant, D., Seletković, I., Schröck, H-W., Nevalainen, S., Bussotti, F., Garcia, P., Wulff, S.: Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. Thünen Institute of Forest Ecosystems, Eberswalde, Germany (2016). https://www.icp-forests.org/pdf/manual/2016/ICP_Manual_2017_02_part04.pdf

  13. Lemon, J.: Plotrix: a package in the red light district of R. R-News. 6(4), 8–12 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project, http://qgis.osgeo.org. Last accessed 31 Aug 2018

  15. DroneDeploy, https://www.dronedeploy.com/. Last accessed 31 Aug 2018

  16. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL https://www.R-project.org/. Last accessed 31 Aug 2018

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by Russian Science Foundation (project No. 18-14-00362).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxim Shashkov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shashkov, M., Ivanova, N., Shanin, V., Grabarnik, P. (2019). Ground Surveys Versus UAV Photography: The Comparison of Two Tree Crown Mapping Techniques. In: Bychkov, I., Voronin, V. (eds) Information Technologies in the Research of Biodiversity. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11720-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics