Abstract
Basics of shading design in relation to both daylight quality and energy savings, through decreasing the amount of electric light needed. More specific requirements for the case of office buildings is presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Koster H (2004) Dynamic daylighting architecture, basic systems projects. Birkhauser, Basel
Lechner N (2001) Heating, cooling, lighting design methods for architects, 2η edn. Wiley, New York
Baker N, Fanchiotti A, Steemers K (1993) Daylighting in architecture. A European reference book. James x James, Brussels
Dubois M (2001) Solar shading for low energy use and daylight quality in offices. Simulations, measurements. Lund University, Lund Institute of Technology, Department of Construction and Architecture, Division of Energy and Building. KFS AB, Lund
Collins B (1976) Review of the psychological reactions to windows. Lighting Res Technol 8(2):80–88
Bulow-Hube E (2001) Energy—efficinet window systems, effects on energy use and daylight in builidngs. Lund University, Department of Construction and Architecture, Division of Energy and Building Design. KFS AB, Lund
Christoffersen J (1995) Daylight utilisation in office buildings. Ph.D. thesis, Danish Building Research Institute, Horsholm, Denmark
Baker N, Steemers K (2001) Daylight design of buildings. James x James, London
Küller R, Ballal SG, Laike T, Mikellides B (1999) Shortness of daylight as a reason for fatigue and sadness. A cross-cultural comparison. In Proceedings of the CIE 24rth session, 1 (pp 291–294). Warsaw
Küller R, Lindsten C (1992) Health and behaviour of children in classrooms with and without windows. J Environ Psychol 12:305–317
Boyce PR, Kennaway DJ (1987) Effects of light on melatonin production. Biol Psychiatry 22:473–478
Lewy AJ, Wehr TA, Goodwin FK, Newsome DA, Markey SP (1980) Light suppresses melatonin secretion in humans. Science 210(12):1267–9
Dubois M (1997) Solar shading and building energy use Lund University, a literature review, Part 1. Lund Institute of Technology, Department of Building Science. KFS AB
Mandalaki M, Tsoutsos T, Papamanolis N (2014) Integrated PV in shading systems for Mediterranean countries: balance between energy production and visual comfort. Energy Build 77:445–456
Van Dijk H (2001) Reference office for thermal, solar and lighting calculations, IEA Task 27, performanc of solar facades components. TNO Building and Construction Research, Delft, The Netherlands
Meresi K (2010) Energy savings in schools through daylighting. Polytechnic School of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki
Tregenza PR, Waters IM (1983) Daylight coefficients. Lighting Research and Technology 15(2):65–71
Reinhart CF, Herkel S (2000) The simulation of annual daylight illuminance distribution—a state of the art comparison of six radiance-based models. Energy Build 32(2):167–187
Tsangrassoulis A, Santamouris M, Asimakopoulos D (1996, October) Theoretical and experimental analysis of daylight performance for various shading systems. Energy Build 24(3):223–230
Gugliermetti F, Bisegna F (2006) Daylighting with external shading devices: desing and simulation algorithms. Building and Environment 41:136–149
Nazzal A (2005) A new evaluation method for daylighting discomfort glare. Int J Industiral Ergonomics 35:295–306
Weinold J, Christoffersen J (2006) Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy Build 743–757
Weinold J (2007) Dynamic simualtion of blind control strategies for visual comfort and energy balance analysis. Proc Build Simuation. Beijing, China
Cuttle C (2003) Lighting by desing. Architectural Press, Oxford
Ajmat R, Mardaljevic J, Hanby VI (2005) Evaluation of shading devices using a hybrid dynamic lighting thermal model. Ninth Int IBPSA Conf. Montreal, Canada
Nabil A, Mardaljevic J (2005) Useful daylighting illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylighting in builidngs. Lighting Res Technol 37:41–59
Johnsen K, Dubois MC, Grau K (2006) Assessment of daylight quality in simple rooms: impact of three window configurations on daylight conditions, Phase 2. Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut, SBi, Horsholm, Sweden
Kittler R, Darula S, MacGowan D (2009) The critical window luminance causing glare in interiors. International Commission on Illumination CIE, Hungary
Cantine F, Dubois MC (2011) Daylighting metrics based on illuminance, distribution, glare and directivity. Light Res Tech 43:291–307
Tsangrassouli A, Bourdakis V, Geros V, Santamouris M (2006, November) A genetic algorithm solution to the design of slat-type shading system. Renew Energy 31(14):2321–2328
Rubin M, Jonsson J, Kohler C, Klems J, Curcija D, Stojanovic N (2007) Biderectional oprical properties of slat shading: comparison between Raytracing and Radiocity methods. Retrieved 10 Sept 2012, from http://windows.lbl.gov/materials/optics/Bidirectional%20Properties%20of%20Slat%20Shading.pdf
Hahne E, Pfluger R (1996) Improvements on PASSYS test cells. Sol Energy 58(4–6):239–246
Bourgeois D, Reinhart CF (2006) An inter model comparison of DDS and daysim daylight coefficient models. In Proceedings of 4rth European conference on energy performance and idoor climate in builidngs (pp 1–6). National Research Council Canada, Lyon, France
Tzempelikos A (2008) Solar optical properties of shading devices: a state-of-the-art review. Adv Build Energy Res 2(I):211–239
Cannon-Brookes S (1997) Simple scale models for daylighting design: analysis of sources of error in illuminance prediction. Lighting Res Technol 29:135–142
Mardaljevic J (2001) The BRE-IDMP dataset: a new benchmark for the validation of illuminance prediction techniques. Lighting Res Technol 33:117–136
ISO 15469 (2004) Spatial distribution of daylight—CIE standard general sky
ISO 15469 (1997) Spatial distribution of daylight—CIE standard overcast sky and clear sky
Mardaljevic J (2004) Verification of program accuracy for illumination modelling: assumptions, methodology and an examination of conflicting findings. Lighting Res Technol 217–242
Mandalaki M (2014) Energy savings within the built environment—an emphasis on daylight control (PhD thesis). Chania: School of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete
Bodart M, Denever A, De Herde A, Wouters P (2007) A guide for building daylight scale models. Archit Sci Rev 50(1)
International, E. A (2000) Daylighting in buildings: a source book on daylighting systems and components. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA
Bodart M, Denever A, De Herde A, Wouters P (2007) A guide for building daylight scale models. Architectural Sci Rev 50(1)
Mandalaki M, Zervas K, Tsoutsos T, Vazakas A (2012) Assessment of fixed shading devices with integrated PV for efficient energy use. Sol Energy 86:2561–2575
Veitch JA, Newsham GR (1995) Quantifying lighting quality based on experimental investigations of end user performance and preference. In Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on energy—efficient lighting. Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
Osterhaus W (1996) Discomfort glare from large area glare sources at computer workstations. In Proceedings of international daylight workshop: building with daylight: energy efficient design (pp 103–110). University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
Osterhaus W (2001) Discomfort glare from daylight in computer ofiices: what do we really know? Proceedings of Lux Europa (Reykjavik, Iceland)
Velds M (2000) Assessment of lighting quality in office rooms with daylighting systems
Schuster GH (2006) The influence of daylight design in office buildings on the users comfort. In Proccedings of PLEA 2006—the 23rd conference on passive and low energy architecture. Geneva, Switzerland
Osterhaus W (2009) Design guidlines for glare—free daylit work environments. In Proceedings of 11th European lighting conference, Lux Europa. Istanbul, Turkey
Frontczak M, Wargocki P (2011) Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor. Build Environ 922–937
Guillemin A (2003) Using genetic algorithms to take into account user wishes in an advanced building control systemes. Ecole Polytechnique Federal De Lausanne, Lausanne
Van Dijk D, Oversloot H (2003) WIS, the European tool to calculate thermal and solar properties of windows and window components. In Proceedings of the 8th IBPSA conference (pp 259–266). Eindhoven
Nielsen T (2005) Simple tool to evaluate energy demands and indoor environment in the early stages of builidng design. Sol Energy 78(1):73–83
Olbina S (2005) Decision—making framework for the selection and design of shading devices. Ph.D. thesis, Blacksburg, Virginia
Hviid C (2008) Simple tool to evaluate the impact of daylight on building energy. Sol Energy 82:787–789
Vartiainen E (1998) Daylighting strategies for adnvance solar facades. In Second ISES Europe solar congress, EuroSun, II.3.18 (pp 1–6). Portorozi, Slovenia
Tzempelikos A, Athienitis A (2007) The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand. Sol Energy 81:369–382
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mandalaki, M., Tsoutsos, T. (2020). Shading Systems: Relation to Daylighting. In: Solar Shading Systems: Design, Performance, and Integrated Photovoltaics. SpringerBriefs in Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11617-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11617-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11616-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11617-0
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)